Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 2004 Dec;89(12):1117–1120. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.037325

Using children as standardised patients for assessing clinical competence in paediatrics

T Tsai 1
PMCID: PMC1719758  PMID: 15557044

Abstract

Background: Standardised patients (SPs) have been widely used to assess physicians' clinical competence. However, in paediatrics, the use of children in such a way has long been questioned with regard to ethics and the examination quality (in terms of validity, reliability, and feasibility).

Aims: To summarise the current state of the use of child SPs, and to highlight the difficulties inherent in the use of children for this purpose.

Methods: Nineteen articles dealing with the use of child SPs for clinical assessment were reviewed.

Results: Child SPs, ranging in age from infancy to adolescence, were present in varied proportions of paediatric objective structured clinical examination stations (12–27%). In most of these reports, there were several children with cases who could substitute for one another. Child SPs successfully portrayed various roles, although only older children had to learn a scenario. In general, clinical examinations using child SPs were found to be valid and generated reliable scores. Child SPs also provided effective feedback. The experience tended to be considered negative for younger children but was quite positive for a number of older children. The use of young SPs should be avoided for ethical reasons, and the use of child SPs should be limited to assessments that cannot be satisfactorily measured by other methods.

Conclusion: Through meticulous attention to detail and careful planning, a clinical examination using children as SPs can be practical, valid, and reliable.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (58.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altshuler L., Kachur E. A culture OSCE: teaching residents to bridge different worlds. Acad Med. 2001 May;76(5):514–514. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200105000-00045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARROWS H. S., ABRAHAMSON S. THE PROGRAMMED PATIENT: A TECHNIQUE FOR APPRAISING STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN CLINICAL NEUROLOGY. J Med Educ. 1964 Aug;39:802–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blake K., Greaven S. Adolescent girls as simulators of medical illness. Med Educ. 1999 Sep;33(9):702–703. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00506.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carraccio C., Englander R. The objective structured clinical examination: a step in the direction of competency-based evaluation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jul;154(7):736–741. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.7.736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carraccio Carol, Wolfsthal Susan D., Englander Robert, Ferentz Kevin, Martin Christine. Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies. Acad Med. 2002 May;77(5):361–367. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200205000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cusimano M. D., Cohen R., Tucker W., Murnaghan J., Kodama R., Reznick R. A comparative analysis of the costs of administration of an OSCE (objective structured clinical examination). Acad Med. 1994 Jul;69(7):571–576. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199407000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frost G. J., Cater J. I., Forsyth J. S. The use of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in paediatrics. Med Teach. 1986;8(3):261–269. doi: 10.3109/01421598609036864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanson M., Hodges B., McNaughton N., Regehr G. The integration of child psychiatry into a psychiatry clerkship OSCE. Can J Psychiatry. 1998 Aug;43(6):614–618. doi: 10.1177/070674379804300610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hergenroeder A. C., Chorley J. N., Laufman L., Fetterhoff A. C. Pediatric residents' performance of ankle and knee examinations after an educational intervention. Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):E52–E52. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.e52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hergenroeder A. C., Laufman L., Chorley J. N., Fetterhoff A. C. Development and evaluation of a method for evaluating pediatric residents' knowledge and skill in performing physical examinations of the ankle and knee. Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):E51–E51. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.e51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hilliard R. I., Tallett S. E. The use of an objective structured clinical examination with postgraduate residents in pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Jan;152(1):74–78. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.1.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Joorabchi B., Devries J. M. Evaluation of clinical competence: the gap between expectation and performance. Pediatrics. 1996 Feb;97(2):179–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Joorabchi B. Objective structured clinical examination in a pediatric residency program. Am J Dis Child. 1991 Jul;145(7):757–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lane J. L., Ziv A., Boulet J. R. A pediatric clinical skills assessment using children as standardized patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jun;153(6):637–644. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.6.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsell D. G., Wolfish N. M., Hsu E. Reliability and validity of the objective structured clinical examination in paediatrics. Med Educ. 1991 Jul;25(4):293–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00069.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Reznick R., Smee S., Rothman A., Chalmers A., Swanson D., Dufresne L., Lacombe G., Baumber J., Poldre P., Levasseur L. An objective structured clinical examination for the licentiate: report of the pilot project of the Medical Council of Canada. Acad Med. 1992 Aug;67(8):487–494. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199208000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Skinner R., Wright C. M., Craft A. W. How to organise the paediatric MRCP (UK) part II clinical examination. Arch Dis Child. 1997 Jun;76(6):545–548. doi: 10.1136/adc.76.6.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith L. J., Price D. A., Houston I. B. Objective structured clinical examination compared with other forms of student assessment. Arch Dis Child. 1984 Dec;59(12):1173–1176. doi: 10.1136/adc.59.12.1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Waterston T., Cater J. I., Mitchell R. G. An objective undergraduate clinical examination in child health. Arch Dis Child. 1980 Dec;55(12):917–922. doi: 10.1136/adc.55.12.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Watson A. R., Houston I. B., Close G. C. Evaluation of an objective structured clinical examination. Arch Dis Child. 1982 May;57(5):390–392. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.5.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Whitcomb Michael E. Competency-based graduate medical education? Of course! But how should competency be assessed? Acad Med. 2002 May;77(5):359–360. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200205000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES