Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 2004 Jul;89(7):625–630. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.032599

Validation of the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score

B Stewart 1, G Lancaster 1, J Lawson 1, K Williams 1, J Daly 1
PMCID: PMC1720010  PMID: 15210492

Abstract

Aims: To describe the validation and reliability of a new pain tool (the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score, AHTPS) for children at triage in the accident and emergency (A&E) setting.

Methods: A new behavioural observational pain tool was developed because of dissatisfaction with available tools and a lack of confidence in self-assessment scores at triage. The study was conducted in a large paediatric A&E department; 575 children (aged 0–16 years) were included. Inter-rater reliability and various aspects of validity were assessed. In addition this tool was compared to the Wong-Baker self-assessment tool.1 The children were concurrently scored by a research nurse and triage nurses to assess inter-rater reliability. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's triage score with the research nurse reassessment score after intervention and/or analgesia. Known group construct validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's score at triage with the level of pain of the condition as judged by the discharge diagnosis. Predictive validity was assessed by comparing the research nurse's AHTPS with the level of analgesia needed by each patient. The AHTPS was also compared to a self-assessment score.

Results: A high level of inter-rater reliability, kappa statistic 0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.88), was shown. Construct validity was well demonstrated; known group construct validity and predictive validity were also demonstrated to a varying degree.

Conclusions: Results support the use of this observational pain scoring tool in the triage of children in A&E.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (121.0 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

 Known groups construct validity: investigator AHTPS (minimum value, interquartile range, median, maximum value) by expected pain level from discharge diagnosis group (by experience).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

 Predictive validity: investigator AHTPS (minimum value, interquartile range, median value, maximum value) by level of analgesia prescribed.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

 Investigator AHTPS v Wong-Baker faces self-assessment scale, at presentation and at reassessment (minimum value, interquartile range, median, maximum value).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985 Jan-Mar;4(1):87–90. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kelly A. M. A process approach to improving pain management in the emergency department: development and evaluation. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 May;17(3):185–187. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.3.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kelly Anne-Maree, Powell Colin V., Williams Anne. Parent visual analogue scale ratings of children's pain do not reliably reflect pain reported by child. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002 Jun;18(3):159–162. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200206000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lipley Nick. Painful lessons. Emerg Nurse. 2002 Apr;10(1):5–5. doi: 10.7748/en.10.1.5.s11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCarthy C., Hewitt S., Choonara I. Pain in young children attending an accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Jul;17(4):265–267. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.4.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McGrath P. A. Evaluating a child's pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1989 Dec;4(4):198–214. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(89)90044-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ross D. M., Ross S. A. The importance of type of question, psychological climate and subject set in interviewing children about pain. Pain. 1984 May;19(1):71–79. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Somers L. J., Beckett M. W., Sedgwick P. M., Hulbert D. C. Improving the delivery of analgesia to children in pain. Emerg Med J. 2001 May;18(3):159–161. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.3.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tarbell S. E., Cohen I. T., Marsh J. L. The Toddler-Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale: an observational scale for measuring postoperative pain in children aged 1-5. Preliminary report. Pain. 1992 Sep;50(3):273–280. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90031-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES