Abstract
AIM—To determine whether venepuncture accords with the accepted (BPA) criteria of not causing more than minimal physical or psychological distress during non-therapeutic research. METHODS—Ninety two venepunctures were carried out in 69 neonates between days 6 and 10 of life, and in some cases, on day 28. Parents were fully informed of the need for the procedure and allowed to attend while it was performed. Ninety parents and 87 doctors completed questionnaires to assess the levels of perceived parental and child distress and anxiety before and after the procedure. RESULTS—Only three parents were very upset, and 47% reported the test as being better than they expected, compared with 10% who thought it worse than expected. Seven babies were recorded as being very upset. Doctors tended to underestimate the degree of anxiety before the procedure and the level of distress afterwards. CONCLUSIONS—Venepuncture in neonates seems to be acceptable to most parents and is associated with a favourable risk: benefit ratio using semiquantitative assessment of risk and benefit. Keywords: venepuncture; risk:benefit ratio; non-therapeutic research
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (58.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Rosser R., Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol. 1978 Dec;7(4):347–358. doi: 10.1093/ije/7.4.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith M. Taking blood from children causes no more than minimal harm. J Med Ethics. 1985 Sep;11(3):127–131. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.3.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]