Abstract
Fifty preterm infants weighing 1200 g or more with clinical and radiographic evidence of respiratory distress syndrome, requiring both mechanical ventilation and exogenous surfactant replacement, were randomly allocated to receive either volume controlled ventilation or time cycled, pressure limited ventilation. Tidal volume delivery in each group was deliberately controlled at 5-8 ml/kg so that the only difference between the two groups was the ventilatory modality, the manner in which tidal volume was delivered. The rest of the ventilatory management and clinical care was done according to protocol. The two modes of ventilation were compared by determining the time required to achieve pre-determined success criteria, based on either the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient or the mean airway pressure as a standard against which the speed of weaning could be objectively assessed. Infants randomised to volume controlled ventilation met success criteria sooner and had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. These babies also had a significantly lower incidence of intraventricular haemorrhages and abnormal periventricular echodensities on ultrasound scans. Volume controlled ventilation seems to be both safe and effective in this group of patients. Keywords: assisted ventilation; alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient; mean airway pressure; respiratory distress syndrome
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (86.4 KB).
Figure 1 .
Characteristic waveforms (volume, VT: pressure, PAW; and flow, 
) for time cycled, pressure limited ventilation. Note contour of the flow waveform, which peaks rapidly and then promptly decelerates.
Figure 2 .
Characteristic waveforms for volume controlled ventilation. Note the contour of the flow waveform, which is square. The volume waveform (top) indicates that peak volume delivery occurs simultaneously with peak pressure and is just before flow deceleration.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beale R., Grover E. R., Smithies M., Bihari D. Acute respiratory distress syndrome ("ARDS"): no more than a severe acute lung injury? BMJ. 1993 Nov 20;307(6915):1335–1339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dreyfuss D., Saumon G. Barotrauma is volutrauma, but which volume is the one responsible? Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(3):139–141. doi: 10.1007/BF01709236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards D. K., Hilton S. V., Merritt T. A., Hallman M., Mannino F., Boynton B. R. Respiratory distress syndrome treated with human surfactant: radiographic findings. Radiology. 1985 Nov;157(2):329–334. doi: 10.1148/radiology.157.2.3840268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinha S. K., Donn S. M. Advances in neonatal conventional ventilation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Sep;75(2):F135–F140. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.2.f135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinha S. K., Nicks J. J., Donn S. M. Graphic analysis of pulmonary mechanics in neonates receiving assisted ventilation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Nov;75(3):F213–F218. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.3.f213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soll R. F., Horbar J. D., Griscom N. T., Barth R. A., Lucey J. F., Taeusch H. W. Radiographic findings associated with surfactant treatment. Am J Perinatol. 1991 Mar;8(2):114–118. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]