Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 1998 Sep;79(2):F83–F87. doi: 10.1136/fn.79.2.f83

Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty

W Tin, S Fritz, U Wariyar, E Hey
PMCID: PMC1720848  PMID: 9828731

Abstract

AIM—To determine whether those most easily reviewed in a population prevalence study differ from those followed up only with difficulty.
METHODS—All babies born before 32 weeks of gestation in the North of England in 1983, 1990, and 1991 were traced, and all the survivors assessed at two years by one of two independent clinicians.
RESULTS—818 of the 1138 live born babies survived to discharge. There was some non-significant, excess disability in the 5% of long term survivors who were difficult to trace because of social mobility, but eight times as much severe disability in the 1% (9/796) in care and in the 5% (38/796) whose parents initially failed to keep a series of home or hospital appointments for interview, and five times as much emergent disability in the 2.7% (22/818) who died after discharge but before their second birthday. Had the babies who were seen without difficulty been considered representative of all the babies surviving to discharge, the reported disability rate would have been two thirds what it really was (6.9% instead of 11.0%).
CONCLUSIONS—Population prevalence studies that ignore those who seem reluctant to cooperate risk serious ascertainment bias.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Britton A., Murray D., Bulstrode C., McPherson K., Denham R. Loss to follow-up: does it matter? Lancet. 1995 Jun 10;345(8963):1511–1512. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell M. K., Halinda E., Carlyle M. J., Fox A. M., Turner L. A., Chance G. W. Factors predictive of follow-up clinic attendance and developmental outcome in a regional cohort of very low birth weight infants. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Nov 1;138(9):704–713. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catlett A. T., Thompson R. J., Jr, Johndrow D. A., Boshkoff M. R. Risk status for dropping out of developmental followup for very low birth weight infants. Public Health Rep. 1993 Sep-Oct;108(5):589–594. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cox A., Rutter M., Yule B., Quinton D. Bias resulting from missing information: some epidemiological findings. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1977 Jun;31(2):131–136. doi: 10.1136/jech.31.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Escobar G. J., Littenberg B., Petitti D. B. Outcome among surviving very low birthweight infants: a meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 1991 Feb;66(2):204–211. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.2.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fooks J., Fritz S., Tin W., Yudkin P., Johnson A., Elbourne D., Hey E. A comparison of two methods of follow-up in a trial of prophylactic volume expansion in preterm babies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;12(2):199–216. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Halliday J. L., Lumley J., Sheffield L. J., Robinson H. P., Renou P., Carlin J. B. Importance of complete follow-up of spontaneous fetal loss after amniocentesis and chorion villus sampling. Lancet. 1992 Oct 10;340(8824):886–890. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93293-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson A. Disability and perinatal care. Pediatrics. 1995 Feb;95(2):272–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mutch L. M., Johnson M. A., Morley R. Follow up studies: design, organisation, and analysis. Arch Dis Child. 1989 Oct;64(10 Spec No):1394–1402. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.10_spec_no.1394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tyson J. E., Lasky R. E., Rosenfeld C. R., Dowling S., Gant N., Jr An analysis of potential biases in the loss of indigent infants to follow-up. Early Hum Dev. 1988 Jan;16(1):13–25. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(88)90083-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wariyar U. K., Richmond S. Morbidity and preterm delivery: importance of 100% follow-up. Lancet. 1989 Feb 18;1(8634):387–388. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91764-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wariyar U., Richmond S., Hey E. Pregnancy outcome at 24-31 weeks' gestation: neonatal survivors. Arch Dis Child. 1989 May;64(5):678–686. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.5.678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wolke D., Söhne B., Ohrt B., Riegel K. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet. 1995 Feb 18;345(8947):447–447. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90425-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES