Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2000 Jan;82(1):F42–F45. doi: 10.1136/fn.82.1.F42

Local anaesthetic effect of topical amethocaine gel in neonates: randomised controlled trial

A Jain, N Rutter
PMCID: PMC1721042  PMID: 10634841

Abstract

AIM—To assess the efficacy of amethocaine as a topical local anaesthetic in neonates.
METHODS—A randomised, double blind controlled trial compared 4% amethocaine gel (Ametop) with placebo in 60 healthy neonates (29 to 42 weeks of gestation) in the first week after birth. Either 1.5 g 4% w/w amethocaine (gel) or 1.5g placebo gel were applied to the dorsum of one foot. No gel was applied to the other foot. Each foot was occluded and left for one hour. Local anaesthesia was then assessed by eliciting the cutaneous withdrawal reflex in response to stimulation with a series of graded nylon filaments (von Frey hairs). The reflex was first elicited from the control and then the treated foot. The difference in filament thickness and deforming weight required to elicit the reflex was recorded.
RESULTS—In infants treated with amethocaine, 17 of 31 (54.8%) showed evidence of local anaesthetic action compared with five of 29(17.2%) in the placebo group (p=0.003). The mean difference in deforming weight required to elicit the reflex was 18.8 g in the amethocaine group compared with 3.9 g in the placebo group (p=0.02). The apparent local anaesthetic action of the placebo can be explained by habituation to repeated stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS—It is concluded that topical amethocaine gel has a local anaesthetic action on neonatal skin which merits further investigation. An effective and safe surface local anaesthetic would be valuable for the relief of procedure related pain in neonates.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acharya A. B., Bustani P. C., Phillips J. D., Taub N. A., Beattie R. M. Randomised controlled trial of eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics cream for venepuncture in healthy preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Mar;78(2):F138–F142. doi: 10.1136/fn.78.2.f138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews K., Fitzgerald M. The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation. Pain. 1994 Jan;56(1):95–101. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker D. P., Rutter N. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F47–F48. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker D. P., Rutter N. Lignocaine ointment and local anaesthesia in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 May;72(3):F203–F204. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.3.f203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brisman M., Ljung B. M., Otterbom I., Larsson L. E., Andréasson S. E. Methaemoglobin formation after the use of EMLA cream in term neonates. Acta Paediatr. 1998 Nov;87(11):1191–1194. doi: 10.1080/080352598750031202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doyle E., Freeman J., Im N. T., Morton N. S. An evaluation of a new self-adhesive patch preparation of amethocaine for topical anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation in children. Anaesthesia. 1993 Dec;48(12):1050–1052. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duncan P. G., Kobrinsky N. Prilocaine-induced methemoglobinemia in a newborn infant. Anesthesiology. 1983 Jul;59(1):75–76. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198307000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fitzgerald M., Shaw A., MacIntosh N. Postnatal development of the cutaneous flexor reflex: comparative study of preterm infants and newborn rat pups. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1988 Aug;30(4):520–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1988.tb04779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harpin V. A., Rutter N. Making heel pricks less painful. Arch Dis Child. 1983 Mar;58(3):226–228. doi: 10.1136/adc.58.3.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumar A. R., Dunn N., Naqvi M. Methemoglobinemia associated with a prilocaine-lidocaine cream. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1997 Apr;36(4):239–240. doi: 10.1177/000992289703600410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Larsson B. A., Jylli L., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Does a local anaesthetic cream (EMLA) alleviate pain from heel-lancing in neonates? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 Nov;39(8):1028–1031. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04223.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Larsson B. A., Tannfeldt G., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Alleviation of the pain of venepuncture in neonates. Acta Paediatr. 1998 Jul;87(7):774–779. doi: 10.1080/080352598750013879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Larsson B. A., Tannfeldt G., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Venipuncture is more effective and less painful than heel lancing for blood tests in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998 May;101(5):882–886. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.5.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lawson R. A., Smart N. G., Gudgeon A. C., Morton N. S. Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Sep;75(3):282–285. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.3.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mazumdar B., Tomlinson A. A., Faulder G. C. Preliminary study to assay plasma amethocaine concentrations after topical application of a new local anaesthetic cream containing amethocaine. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Oct;67(4):432–436. doi: 10.1093/bja/67.4.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McCafferty D. F., Woolfson A. D., Boston V. In vivo assessment of percutaneous local anaesthetic preparations. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Jan;62(1):17–21. doi: 10.1093/bja/62.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rushforth J. A., Griffiths G., Thorpe H., Levene M. I. Can topical lignocaine reduce behavioural response to heel prick? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F49–F51. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shah V. S., Taddio A., Bennett S., Speidel B. D. Neonatal pain response to heel stick vs venepuncture for routine blood sampling. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Sep;77(2):F143–F144. doi: 10.1136/fn.77.2.f143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taddio A., Ohlsson A., Einarson T. R., Stevens B., Koren G. A systematic review of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) in the treatment of acute pain in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998 Feb;101(2):E1–E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.2.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Woolf C. J., Swett J. E. The cutaneous contribution to the hamstring flexor reflex in the rat: an electrophysiological and anatomical study. Brain Res. 1984 Jun 15;303(2):299–312. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91216-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Woolfson A. D., McCafferty D. F., Boston V. Clinical experiences with a novel percutaneous amethocaine preparation: prevention of pain due to venepuncture in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 Aug;30(2):273–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03775.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES