Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2000 May;82(3):F208–F214. doi: 10.1136/fn.82.3.F208

Effects of gestation and birth weight on the growth and development of very low birthweight small for gestational age infants: a matched group comparison

T Gutbrod, D Wolke, B Soehne, B Ohrt, K Riegel
PMCID: PMC1721075  PMID: 10794788

Abstract

AIMS—To investigate the effects of small for gestational age (SGA) in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants on growth and development until the fifth year of life.
METHODS—VLBW (< 1500 g) infants, selected from a prospective study, were classified as SGA (n = 115) on the basis of birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age and were compared with two groups of appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants matched according to birth weight (AGA-BW; n = 115) or gestation at birth (AGA-GA; n = 115). Prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal risk factors were recorded, and duration and intensity of treatment were computed from daily assessments. Body weight, length, and head circumference were measured at birth, five and 20 months (corrected for prematurity), and at 56 months. General development was assessed at five and 20 months with the Griffiths scale of babies abilities, and cognitive development at 56 months with the Columbia mental maturity scales, a vocabulary (AWST) and language comprehension test (LSVTA).
RESULTS—Significant group differences were found in complications (pregnancy, birth, and neonatal), parity, and multiple birth rate. The AGA-GA group showed most satisfactory growth up to 56 months, with both the AGA-BW and SGA groups lagging behind. The AGA-GA group also scored significantly more highly on all developmental and cognitive tests than the other groups. Developmental test results were similar for the SGA and AGA-BW groups at five and 20 months, but AGA-BW infants (lowest gestation) had lower scores on performance intelligence quotient and language comprehension at 56 months than the SGA group. When prenatal and neonatal complications, parity, and multiple birth were accounted for, group differences in growth remained, but differences in cognitive outcome disappeared after five months.
CONCLUSIONS—Being underweight and with a short gestation (SGA and VLBW) leads to poor weight gain and head growth in infancy but does not result in poorer growth than in infants of the same birth weight but shorter gestation (AGA-BW) in the long term. SGA is related to early developmental delay and later language problems; however, neonatal complications may have a larger detrimental effect on long term cognitive development of VLBW infants than whether they are born SGA or AGA.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (150.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen M. C. Developmental outcome and followup of the small for gestational age infant. Semin Perinatol. 1984 Apr;8(2):123–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ericson A., Källén B. Very low birthweight boys at the age of 19. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 May;78(3):F171–F174. doi: 10.1136/fn.78.3.f171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hutton J. L., Pharoah P. O., Cooke R. W., Stevenson R. C. Differential effects of preterm birth and small gestational age on cognitive and motor development. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Mar;76(2):F75–F81. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.2.f75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kitchen W. H., Doyle L. W., Ford G. W., Callanan C. Very low birth weight and growth to age 8 years. I: Weight and height. Am J Dis Child. 1992 Jan;146(1):40–45. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160130042019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Largo R. H., Molinari L., Comenale Pinto L., Weber M., Duc G. Language development of term and preterm children during the first five years of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986 Jun;28(3):333–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb03882.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCarton C. M., Wallace I. F., Divon M., Vaughan H. G., Jr Cognitive and neurologic development of the premature, small for gestational age infant through age 6: comparison by birth weight and gestational age. Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1167–1178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paz I., Gale R., Laor A., Danon Y. L., Stevenson D. K., Seidman D. S. The cognitive outcome of full-term small for gestational age infants at late adolescence. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Mar;85(3):452–456. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00430-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pryor J., Silva P. A., Brooke M. Growth, development and behaviour in adolescents born small-for-gestational-age. J Paediatr Child Health. 1995 Oct;31(5):403–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1995.tb00847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scherjon S. A., Oosting H., Smolders-DeHaas H., Zondervan H. A., Kok J. H. Neurodevelopmental outcome at three years of age after fetal 'brain-sparing'. Early Hum Dev. 1998 Aug 28;52(1):67–79. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(98)00004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scherjon S. A., Smolders-DeHaas H., Kok J. H., Zondervan H. A. The "brain-sparing" effect: antenatal cerebral Doppler findings in relation to neurologic outcome in very preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;169(1):169–175. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90156-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smedler A. C., Faxelius G., Bremme K., Lagerström M. Psychological development in children born with very low birth weight after severe intrauterine growth retardation: a 10-year follow-up study. Acta Paediatr. 1992 Mar;81(3):197–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1992.tb12203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Soothill P. W., Ajayi R. A., Nicolaides K. N. Fetal biochemistry in growth retardation. Early Hum Dev. 1992 Jun-Jul;29(1-3):91–97. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(92)90062-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Spinillo A., Capuzzo E., Piazzi G., Baltaro F., Stronati M., Ometto A. Significance of low birthweight for gestational age among very preterm infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jun;104(6):668–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11976.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sung I. K., Vohr B., Oh W. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants with intrauterine growth retardation: comparison with control subjects matched by birth weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1993 Oct;123(4):618–624. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80965-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Veelken N., Stollhoff K., Claussen M. Development and perinatal risk factors of very low-birth-weight infants. Small versus appropriate for gestational age. Neuropediatrics. 1992 Apr;23(2):102–107. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1071321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wolke D. Language problems in neonatal at risk children: towards an understanding of developmental mechanisms. Acta Paediatr. 1999 May;88(5):488–490. doi: 10.1080/08035259950169468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wolke D., Meyer R. Cognitive status, language attainment, and prereading skills of 6-year-old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999 Feb;41(2):94–109. doi: 10.1017/s0012162299000201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wolke D., Meyer R., Ohrt B., Riegel K. The incidence of sleeping problems in preterm and fullterm infants discharged from neonatal special care units: an epidemiological longitudinal study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995 Feb;36(2):203–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wolke D. Psychological development of prematurely born children. Arch Dis Child. 1998 Jun;78(6):567–570. doi: 10.1136/adc.78.6.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wolke D., Ratschinski G., Ohrt B., Riegel K. The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. Eur J Pediatr. 1994 Dec;153(12):906–915. doi: 10.1007/BF01954744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wolke D., Söhne B., Ohrt B., Riegel K. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet. 1995 Feb 18;345(8947):447–447. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90425-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wolke D., Söhne B., Riegel K., Ohrt B., Osterlund K. An epidemiologic longitudinal study of sleeping problems and feeding experience of preterm and term children in southern Finland: comparison with a southern German population sample. J Pediatr. 1998 Aug;133(2):224–231. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70224-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES