Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2000 May;82(3):F233–F236. doi: 10.1136/fn.82.3.F233

Contact lens electroretinography in preterm infants from 32 weeks after conception: a development in current methodology

H Mactier, R Hamilton, M Bradnam, T Turner, J Dudgeon
PMCID: PMC1721095  PMID: 10794793

Abstract

AIM—To assess the feasibility of using a contact lens electrode to record the electroretinogram (ERG) in preterm infants less than 35 weeks after conception.
METHODS—The ERG was recorded from seven very low birthweight preterm infants on a total of 14 occasions using an infant monkey contact lens electrode. Age at recording the first ERG ranged from 23to 51 days (gestational age 32-34 weeks), and weight ranged upwards from 1100g.
RESULTS—No complications were observed. With advancing age and maturity the dark adapted rod threshold decreased, indicating increased retinal sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS—Contact lens recording of the ERG from extremely small immature preterm infants is a practicable and well tolerated procedure. This method of recording the ERG will enable further evaluation of retinal development in this vulnerable population.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradnam M. S., Evans A. L., Montgomery D. M., Keating D., Damato B. E., Cluckie A., Allan D. A personal computer-based visual evoked potential stimulus and recording system. Doc Ophthalmol. 1994;86(1):81–93. doi: 10.1007/BF01224630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradnam M. S., Montgomery D. M., Moseley H., Dutton G. N. Quantitative assessment of the blue-light hazard during indirect ophthalmoscopy and the increase in the "safe" operating period achieved using a yellow lens. Ophthalmology. 1995 May;102(5):799–804. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30954-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cherry T. A., Lambert S. R., Capone A., Jr Electroretinographic findings in stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity after retinal reattachment. Retina. 1995;15(1):21–24. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199515010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawson W. W., Trick G. L., Litzkow C. A. Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979 Sep;18(9):988–991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fulton A. B., Hansen R. M. Electroretinogram responses and refractive errors in patients with a history of retinopathy prematurity. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;91(2):87–100. doi: 10.1007/BF01203688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fulton A. B., Hansen R. M. Photoreceptor function in infants and children with a history of mild retinopathy of prematurity. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1996 Mar;13(3):566–571. doi: 10.1364/josaa.13.000566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fulton A. B., Hansen R. M. The rod sensitivity of dark adapted human infants. Curr Eye Res. 1992 Dec;11(12):1193–1198. doi: 10.3109/02713689208999544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fulton A. B. The development of scotopic retinal function in human infants. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Jun;69(2):101–109. doi: 10.1007/BF00153690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hansen R. M., Fulton A. B., Harris S. J. Background adaptation in human infants. Vision Res. 1986;26(5):771–779. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90092-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hood D. C., Birch D. G. Assessing abnormal rod photoreceptor activity with the a-wave of the electroretinogram: applications and methods. Doc Ophthalmol. 1996;92(4):253–267. doi: 10.1007/BF02584080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kennedy K. A., Ipson M. A., Birch D. G., Tyson J. E., Anderson J. L., Nusinowitz S., West L., Spencer R., Birch E. E. Light reduction and the electroretinogram of preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 May;76(3):F168–F173. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.3.f168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leaf A. A., Green C. R., Esack A., Costeloe K. L., Prior P. F. Maturation of electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995 Sep;37(9):814–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1995.tb12065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mactier H., Dexter J. D., Hewett J. E., Latham C. B., Woodruff C. W. The electroretinogram in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1988 Sep;113(3):607–612. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80663-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marmor M. F., Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography (1999 update). International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Doc Ophthalmol. 1998;97(2):143–156. doi: 10.1023/a:1002016531591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mets M. B., Smith V. C., Pokorny J., Pass A. Postnatal retinal development as measured by the electroretinogram in premature infants. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;90(2):111–127. doi: 10.1007/BF01203332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Uauy R. D., Birch D. G., Birch E. E., Tyson J. E., Hoffman D. R. Effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acids on retinal function of very-low-birth-weight neonates. Pediatr Res. 1990 Nov;28(5):485–492. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199011000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WINKELMAN J. E., HORSTEN G. P. The ERG of premature and full-term born infants during their first days of life. Ophthalmologica. 1962;143:92–101. doi: 10.1159/000304199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES