Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2000 Nov;83(3):F211–F214. doi: 10.1136/fn.83.3.F211

Topical amethocaine gel in the newborn infant: how soon does it work and how long does it last?

A Jain, N Rutter
PMCID: PMC1721176  PMID: 11040171

Abstract

AIM—To explore the time of onset and duration of action of topical amethocaine gel in the newborn infant.
DESIGN—A randomised double blind placebo controlled trial.
SUBJECTS—Thirty six infants were studied after 30 minutes application and 36 after 60 minutes application. A total of 56 infants (gestation 27-42 weeks, weight 0.79-4.1 kg) were studied in the first two weeks after delivery.
METHOD—1.5 g amethocaine or placebo was applied to the dorsum of either foot, occluded, and then left for 30 or 60 minutes. Local anaesthesia was assessed by observing the cutaneous withdrawal response to graded nylon filaments (von Frey hairs). If there was a difference between feet in filament thickness required to elicit a response, the infant was studied in an identical manner at hourly intervals until the difference had disappeared.
RESULTS—Evidence of local anaesthetic action of amethocaine was seen in 23 of 36 (64%) infants after 30 minutes and 26 of 36 (72%) infants after 60 minutes application (no significant difference). Evidence of local anaesthetic action was independent of gestation and order of testing. Amethocaine responders showed a significantly deeper anaesthetic action than placebo responders. The median duration of action was 1.5 hours (range 0.5-3.5) after 30 minutes and three hours (range 1-5) after 60 minutes (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION—Topical amethocaine gel has a local anaesthetic action after 30 minutes application, but application for 60 minutes results in longer duration of action.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acharya A. B., Bustani P. C., Phillips J. D., Taub N. A., Beattie R. M. Randomised controlled trial of eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics cream for venepuncture in healthy preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Mar;78(2):F138–F142. doi: 10.1136/fn.78.2.f138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews K., Fitzgerald M. The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation. Pain. 1994 Jan;56(1):95–101. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker D. P., Rutter N. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F47–F48. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker D. P., Rutter N. Lignocaine ointment and local anaesthesia in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 May;72(3):F203–F204. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.3.f203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carbajal R., Chauvet X., Couderc S., Olivier-Martin M. Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates. BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1393–1397. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doyle E., Freeman J., Im N. T., Morton N. S. An evaluation of a new self-adhesive patch preparation of amethocaine for topical anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation in children. Anaesthesia. 1993 Dec;48(12):1050–1052. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzgerald M., Shaw A., MacIntosh N. Postnatal development of the cutaneous flexor reflex: comparative study of preterm infants and newborn rat pups. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1988 Aug;30(4):520–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1988.tb04779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haouari N., Wood C., Griffiths G., Levene M. The analgesic effect of sucrose in full term infants: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1995 Jun 10;310(6993):1498–1500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6993.1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harpin V. A., Rutter N. Making heel pricks less painful. Arch Dis Child. 1983 Mar;58(3):226–228. doi: 10.1136/adc.58.3.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jain A., Rutter N. Local anaesthetic effect of topical amethocaine gel in neonates: randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000 Jan;82(1):F42–F45. doi: 10.1136/fn.82.1.F42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Larsson B. A., Jylli L., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Does a local anaesthetic cream (EMLA) alleviate pain from heel-lancing in neonates? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 Nov;39(8):1028–1031. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04223.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Larsson B. A., Tannfeldt G., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Alleviation of the pain of venepuncture in neonates. Acta Paediatr. 1998 Jul;87(7):774–779. doi: 10.1080/080352598750013879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Larsson B. A., Tannfeldt G., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Venipuncture is more effective and less painful than heel lancing for blood tests in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998 May;101(5):882–886. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.5.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lawson R. A., Smart N. G., Gudgeon A. C., Morton N. S. Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Sep;75(3):282–285. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.3.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mazumdar B., Tomlinson A. A., Faulder G. C. Preliminary study to assay plasma amethocaine concentrations after topical application of a new local anaesthetic cream containing amethocaine. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Oct;67(4):432–436. doi: 10.1093/bja/67.4.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McCafferty D. F., Woolfson A. D., Boston V. In vivo assessment of percutaneous local anaesthetic preparations. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Jan;62(1):17–21. doi: 10.1093/bja/62.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McCafferty D. F., Woolfson A. D., Handley J., Allen G. Effect of percutaneous local anaesthetics on pain reduction during pulse dye laser treatment of portwine stains. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Mar;78(3):286–289. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.3.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rushforth J. A., Griffiths G., Thorpe H., Levene M. I. Can topical lignocaine reduce behavioural response to heel prick? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F49–F51. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rutter N., Hull D. Water loss from the skin of term and preterm babies. Arch Dis Child. 1979 Nov;54(11):858–868. doi: 10.1136/adc.54.11.858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shah V. S., Taddio A., Bennett S., Speidel B. D. Neonatal pain response to heel stick vs venepuncture for routine blood sampling. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Sep;77(2):F143–F144. doi: 10.1136/fn.77.2.f143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taddio A., Ohlsson A., Einarson T. R., Stevens B., Koren G. A systematic review of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) in the treatment of acute pain in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998 Feb;101(2):E1–E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.2.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Woolf C. J., Swett J. E. The cutaneous contribution to the hamstring flexor reflex in the rat: an electrophysiological and anatomical study. Brain Res. 1984 Jun 15;303(2):299–312. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91216-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Woolfson A. D., McCafferty D. F., Boston V. Clinical experiences with a novel percutaneous amethocaine preparation: prevention of pain due to venepuncture in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 Aug;30(2):273–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03775.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES