Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2001 Jan;84(1):F56–F59. doi: 10.1136/fn.84.1.F56

Topical amethocaine gel for pain relief of heel prick blood sampling: a randomised double blind controlled trial

A Jain, N Rutter, M Ratnayaka
PMCID: PMC1721197  PMID: 11124928

Abstract

BACKGROUND—Heel prick blood sampling is a commonly performed and painful procedure in the newborn infant. Use of a topical local anaesthetic does not relieve this pain. A 4% w/w amethocaine gel (Ametop) reduces the pain of venepuncture in the newborn but has not been tried with heel pricks.
AIM—To investigate the effect of topical amethocaine gel on the pain of heel prick in the newborn infant.
DESIGN—Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.
SUBJECTS—Sixty newborn infants, gestation 28-42 weeks (median 36), postnatal age 1-16 days (median 5) undergoing routine heel prick blood sampling.
METHODS—A 1.5 g portion of 4% w/w amethocaine gel or placebo was applied to the skin under occlusion for one hour, then wiped away. Heel prick blood sampling with a spring loaded lance was performed five minutes later. The procedure was videotaped and pain assessed at one second intervals using an adaptation of the neonatal facial coding system (NFCS). No or minimal pain was defined as a cumulative score of less than 5 (out of 15) in the three seconds after firing of the lance and as lack of a cry in the first five seconds.
RESULTS—In terms of a low NFCS core and lack of cry (p = 0.12) 20 of 30 (67%) in the amethocaine group and 13 of 29 (45%) in the placebo group had no or minimal pain in response to the heel prick. The median cumulative NFCS score over the three seconds after firing the lance was 3 (interquartile range 0-6) in the amethocaine group compared with 5 (interquartile range 1-10) in the placebo group (p = 0.07). These differences are not significant.
CONCLUSIONS—Topical amethocaine gel does not have a clinically important effect on the pain of heel prick blood sampling and its use for this purpose cannot therefore be recommended. Alternative approaches to the relief of pain from this procedure should be explored.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barker D. P., Latty B. W., Rutter N. Heel blood sampling in preterm infants: which technique? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 Nov;71(3):F206–F208. doi: 10.1136/fn.71.3.f206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker D. P., Rutter N. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F47–F48. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker D. P., Rutter N. Lignocaine ointment and local anaesthesia in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 May;72(3):F203–F204. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.3.f203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Craig K. D., Whitfield M. F., Grunau R. V., Linton J., Hadjistavropoulos H. D. Pain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices. Pain. 1993 Mar;52(3):287–299. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90162-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doyle E., Freeman J., Im N. T., Morton N. S. An evaluation of a new self-adhesive patch preparation of amethocaine for topical anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation in children. Anaesthesia. 1993 Dec;48(12):1050–1052. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fitzgerald M., Millard C., McIntosh N. Cutaneous hypersensitivity following peripheral tissue damage in newborn infants and its reversal with topical anaesthesia. Pain. 1989 Oct;39(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90172-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grunau R. V., Whitfield M. F., Petrie J. H. Pain sensitivity and temperament in extremely low-birth-weight premature toddlers and preterm and full-term controls. Pain. 1994 Sep;58(3):341–346. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harpin V. A., Rutter N. Making heel pricks less painful. Arch Dis Child. 1983 Mar;58(3):226–228. doi: 10.1136/adc.58.3.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jain A., Rutter N. Local anaesthetic effect of topical amethocaine gel in neonates: randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000 Jan;82(1):F42–F45. doi: 10.1136/fn.82.1.F42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnston C. C., Collinge J. M., Henderson S. J., Anand K. J. A cross-sectional survey of pain and pharmacological analgesia in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Clin J Pain. 1997 Dec;13(4):308–312. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199712000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Larsson B. A., Jylli L., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Does a local anaesthetic cream (EMLA) alleviate pain from heel-lancing in neonates? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 Nov;39(8):1028–1031. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04223.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Larsson B. A., Norman M., Bjerring P., Egekvist H., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Regional variations in skin perfusion and skin thickness may contribute to varying efficacy of topical, local anaesthetics in neonates. Paediatr Anaesth. 1996;6(2):107–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.1996.tb00370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Larsson B. A., Tannfeldt G., Lagercrantz H., Olsson G. L. Venipuncture is more effective and less painful than heel lancing for blood tests in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998 May;101(5):882–886. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.5.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lawson R. A., Smart N. G., Gudgeon A. C., Morton N. S. Evaluation of an amethocaine gel preparation for percutaneous analgesia before venous cannulation in children. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Sep;75(3):282–285. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.3.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCafferty D. F., Woolfson A. D., Boston V. In vivo assessment of percutaneous local anaesthetic preparations. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Jan;62(1):17–21. doi: 10.1093/bja/62.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McIntosh N., van Veen L., Brameyer H. Alleviation of the pain of heel prick in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 May;70(3):F177–F181. doi: 10.1136/fn.70.3.f177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oberlander T. F., Gilbert C. A., Chambers C. T., O'Donnell M. E., Craig K. D. Biobehavioral responses to acute pain in adolescents with a significant neurologic impairment. Clin J Pain. 1999 Sep;15(3):201–209. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199909000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Owens M. E., Todt E. H. Pain in infancy: neonatal reaction to a heel lance. Pain. 1984 Sep;20(1):77–86. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90813-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Porter F. L., Grunau R. E., Anand K. J. Long-term effects of pain in infants. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1999 Aug;20(4):253–261. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199908000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rich E. C., Marshall R. E., Volpe J. J. The normal neonatal response to pin-prick. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1974 Aug;16(4):432–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1974.tb03367.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rushforth J. A., Griffiths G., Thorpe H., Levene M. I. Can topical lignocaine reduce behavioural response to heel prick? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F49–F51. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rushforth J. A., Levene M. I. Behavioural response to pain in healthy neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 May;70(3):F174–F176. doi: 10.1136/fn.70.3.f174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shah V. S., Taddio A., Bennett S., Speidel B. D. Neonatal pain response to heel stick vs venepuncture for routine blood sampling. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Sep;77(2):F143–F144. doi: 10.1136/fn.77.2.f143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Taddio A., Goldbach M., Ipp M., Stevens B., Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in boys. Lancet. 1995 Feb 4;345(8945):291–292. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90278-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Taddio A., Katz J., Ilersich A. L., Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. Lancet. 1997 Mar 1;349(9052):599–603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10316-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wester U. Analgesic effect of lidocaine ointment on intact skin in neonates. Acta Paediatr. 1993 Sep;82(9):791–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1993.tb12560.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Woolfson A. D., McCafferty D. F., Boston V. Clinical experiences with a novel percutaneous amethocaine preparation: prevention of pain due to venepuncture in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 Aug;30(2):273–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1990.tb03775.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES