Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2001 Sep;85(2):F86–F90. doi: 10.1136/fn.85.2.F86

A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants

M Mazzella, C Bellini, M Calevo, F Campone, D Massocco, P Mezzano, E Zullino, F Scopesi, C Arioni, W Bonacci, G Serra
PMCID: PMC1721298  PMID: 11517199

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To compare the effectiveness of the Infant Flow Driver (IFD) with single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in preterm neonates affected by respiratory distress syndrome.
DESIGN—Randomised controlled study.
PATIENTS—Between September 1997 and March 1999, 36 preterm infants who were eligible for CPAP treatment were randomly selected for either nCPAP or IFD and studied prospectively for changes in oxygen requirement and/or respiratory rate. The requirement for mechanical ventilation, complications of treatment, and effects on mid-term outcome were also evaluated.
RESULTS—Use of the IFD had a significantly beneficial effect on both oxygen requirement and respiratory rate (p < 0.0001) when compared with nCPAP. Moreover, O2 requirement and respiratory rate were significantly decreased by four hours (p < 0.001 and p < 0.03 respectively). The probability of remaining supplementary oxygen free over the first 48 hours of treatment was significantly higher in patients treated with the IFD than with nCPAP (p < 0.02). IFD treated patients had a higher success (weaning) rate (94% v 72%) and shorter duration of treatment (49.3 (31) v 56 (29.7) hours respectively; mean (SD)), although the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS—IFD appears to be a feasible device for managing respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants, and benefits may be had with regard to oxygen requirement and respiratory rate when compared with nCPAP. The trend towards reduced requirement for mechanical ventilation, shorter clinical recovery time, and shorter duration of treatment requires further evaluation in a multicentre randomised clinical trial.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahluwalia J. S., White D. K., Morley C. J. Infant Flow Driver or single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure: short-term physiological effects. Acta Paediatr. 1998 Mar;87(3):325–327. doi: 10.1080/08035259850157408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Claris O., Salle B. L., Lapillonne A., Ronin E., Picaud J. C., Besnier S. Nouvelle technique de pression positive continue par voie nasale en néonatologie. Arch Pediatr. 1996 May;3(5):452–456. doi: 10.1016/0929-693x(96)86403-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gherini S., Peters R. M., Virgilio R. W. Mechanical work on the lungs and work of breathing with positive end-expiratory pressure and continuous positive airway pressure. Chest. 1979 Sep;76(3):251–256. doi: 10.1378/chest.76.3.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gregory G. A., Kitterman J. A., Phibbs R. H., Tooley W. H., Hamilton W. K. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971 Jun 17;284(24):1333–1340. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197106172842401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kamper J., Wulff K., Larsen C., Lindequist S. Early treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in very low-birth-weight infants. Acta Paediatr. 1993 Feb;82(2):193–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1993.tb12637.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kavvadia V., Greenough A., Dimitriou G. Effect on lung function of continuous positive airway pressure administered either by infant flow driver or a single nasal prong. Eur J Pediatr. 2000 Apr;159(4):289–292. doi: 10.1007/s004310050072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Millet V., Lacroze V., Bartoli J. M., Unal D. Nécrose de la columelle nasale secondaire à la pression positive continue (PPC) nasale. Arch Pediatr. 1997 May;4(5):485–485. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(97)86682-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moa G., Nilsson K. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure: experiences with a new technical approach. Acta Paediatr. 1993 Feb;82(2):210–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1993.tb12642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moa G., Nilsson K., Zetterström H., Jonsson L. O. A new device for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the newborn: an experimental study. Crit Care Med. 1988 Dec;16(12):1238–1242. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198812000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Papile L. A., Burstein J., Burstein R., Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978 Apr;92(4):529–534. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Robertson N. J., Hamilton P. A. Randomised trial of elective continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with rescue CPAP after extubation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Jul;79(1):F58–F60. doi: 10.1136/fn.79.1.f58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robertson N. J., McCarthy L. S., Hamilton P. A., Moss A. L. Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Nov;75(3):F209–F212. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.3.f209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Räsänen J., Leijala M. Breathing circuit respiratory work in infants recovering from respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 1991 Jan;19(1):31–35. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199101000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vilstrup C. T., Björklund L. J., Larsson A., Lachmann B., Werner O. Functional residual capacity and ventilation homogeneity in mechanically ventilated small neonates. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1992 Jul;73(1):276–283. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.1.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES