Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2001 Nov;85(3):F159–F164. doi: 10.1136/fn.85.3.F159

Outcome at 14 years of extremely low birthweight infants: a regional study

L Doyle, D Casalaz
PMCID: PMC1721322  PMID: 11668155

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To determine the neurosensory outcome at 14 years of age of a regional cohort of extremely low birthweight (ELBW) children, to contrast their prognosis with normal birthweight (NBW) controls, and to determine the predictive value of assessments earlier in childhood.
DESIGN—Geographically determined cohort study.
SETTING—The state of Victoria, Australia.
PATIENTS—Consecutive ELBW survivors of birth weight 500-999 g (n = 88) born during 1979-1980, and 60 randomly selected contemporaneous NBW (birth weight > 2499 g) controls.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Rates of neurosensory impairments and disabilities at 14 years of age, and earlier in childhood.
RESULTS—Of 351 ELBW consecutive live births, 88 (25%) survived and 79 (90%) of the survivors were assessed at 14 years of age. Of the 79 ELBW children assessed, eight (10%) had cerebral palsy, five (6%) had bilateral blindness, four (5%) were deaf requiring hearing aids, and 36 (46%) had an intelligence quotient (IQ) < −1 SD compared with the mean for the NBW controls. Overall 11(14%) ELBW children were severely disabled, 12 (15%) were moderately disabled, 20 (25%) were mildly disabled, and 36 (46%) had no disability. In contrast, only one (2%) of 42 NBW children assessed had a severe disability, six (14%) had a mild disability, and the remaining 35 (83%) were not disabled. Comparing psychological test scores for ELBW children with those for NBW controls, rather than test norms, avoided bias in the assessment of disability earlier in childhood. Relative to assessments earlier in childhood, the prediction of disability at 14 years of age was highly significant at each of 2, 5, and 8 years of age, but the accuracy progressively increased with age.
CONCLUSIONS—ELBW children have substantially higher rates of neurosensory impairments and disabilities at 14 years of age than NBW controls. Comparison of ELBW children with NBW controls avoids bias in the assessment of disability. Early childhood assessments are highly predictive of disability at 14 years of age.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (223.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bill J. M., Sykes D. H., Hoy E. A. Difficulties in comparing outcomes of low-birthweight studies because of obsolescent test norms. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986 Apr;28(2):244–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb03861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Botting N., Powls A., Cooke R. W., Marlow N. Cognitive and educational outcome of very-low-birthweight children in early adolescence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998 Oct;40(10):652–660. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1998.tb12324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ericson A., Källén B. Very low birthweight boys at the age of 19. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 May;78(3):F171–F174. doi: 10.1136/fn.78.3.f171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ford G. W., Kitchen W. H., Doyle L. W., Rickards A. L., Kelly E. Changing diagnosis of cerebral palsy in very low birthweight children. Am J Perinatol. 1990 Apr;7(2):178–181. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ford G. W., Rickards A. L., Kitchen W. H., Lissenden J. V., Ryan M. M., Keith C. G. Very low birthweight and normal birthweight infants. A comparison of continuing morbidity. Med J Aust. 1986 Aug 4;145(3-4):125–128. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb113768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gross S. J., Slagle T. A., D'Eugenio D. B., Mettelman B. B. Impact of a matched term control group on interpretation of developmental performance in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 1992 Nov;90(5):681–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hack M., Taylor H. G., Klein N., Eiben R., Schatschneider C., Mercuri-Minich N. School-age outcomes in children with birth weights under 750 g. N Engl J Med. 1994 Sep 22;331(12):753–759. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199409223311201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunt J. V., Cooper B. A., Tooley W. H. Very low birth weight infants at 8 and 11 years of age: role of neonatal illness and family status. Pediatrics. 1988 Oct;82(4):596–603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kitchen W., Ford G., Orgill A., Rickards A., Astbury J., Lissenden J., Bajuk B., Yu V., Drew J., Campbell N. Outcome in infants of birth weight 500 to 999 g: a continuing regional study of 5-year-old survivors. J Pediatr. 1987 Nov;111(5):761–766. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80264-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kitchen W., Ford G., Orgill A., Rickards A., Astbury J., Lissenden J., Bajuk B., Yu V., Drew J., Campbell N. Outcome in infants with birth weight 500 to 999 gm: a regional study of 1979 and 1980 births. J Pediatr. 1984 Jun;104(6):921–927. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80500-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McCormick M. C., Brooks-Gunn J., Workman-Daniels K., Turner J., Peckham G. J. The health and developmental status of very low-birth-weight children at school age. JAMA. 1992 Apr 22;267(16):2204–2208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morley R., Farewell V. Methodological issues in randomized controlled trials. Semin Neonatol. 2000 May;5(2):141–148. doi: 10.1053/siny.1999.0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moses L. E., Emerson J. D., Hosseini H. Analyzing data from ordered categories. N Engl J Med. 1984 Aug 16;311(7):442–448. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198408163110705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. O'Callaghan M. J., Burns Y. R., Gray P. H., Harvey J. M., Mohay H., Rogers Y. M., Tudehope D. I. School performance of ELBW children: a controlled study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996 Oct;38(10):917–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15048.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ornstein M., Ohlsson A., Edmonds J., Asztalos E. Neonatal follow-up of very low birthweight/extremely low birthweight infants to school age: a critical overview. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1991 Aug-Sep;80(8-9):741–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1991.tb11943.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rickards A. L., Kitchen W. H., Doyle L. W., Kelly E. A. Correction of developmental and intelligence test scores for premature birth. Aust Paediatr J. 1989 Jun;25(3):127–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1989.tb01434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ross G., Lipper E. G., Auld P. A. Consistency and change in the development of premature infants weighing less than 1,501 grams at birth. Pediatrics. 1985 Dec;76(6):885–891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Saigal S., Hoult L. A., Streiner D. L., Stoskopf B. L., Rosenbaum P. L. School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):325–331. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saigal S., Szatmari P., Rosenbaum P., Campbell D., King S. Cognitive abilities and school performance of extremely low birth weight children and matched term control children at age 8 years: a regional study. J Pediatr. 1991 May;118(5):751–760. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stanley F. J. Using cerebral palsy data in the evaluation of neonatal intensive care: a warning. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1982 Feb;24(1):93–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1982.tb13594.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taylor H. G., Klein N., Hack M. School-age consequences of birth weight less than 750 g: a review and update. Dev Neuropsychol. 2000;17(3):289–321. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN1703_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Teplin S. W., Burchinal M., Johnson-Martin N., Humphry R. A., Kraybill E. N. Neurodevelopmental, health, and growth status at age 6 years of children with birth weights less than 1001 grams. J Pediatr. 1991 May;118(5):768–777. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolke D., Ratschinski G., Ohrt B., Riegel K. The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. Eur J Pediatr. 1994 Dec;153(12):906–915. doi: 10.1007/BF01954744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES