Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2004 Jan;89(1):F37–F40. doi: 10.1136/fn.89.1.F37

Non-expert use of the cerebral function monitor for neonatal seizure detection

J Rennie, G Chorley, G Boylan, R Pressler, Y Nguyen, R Hooper
PMCID: PMC1721641  PMID: 14711852

Abstract

Background: The cerebral function monitor (CFM) is widely used to detect neonatal seizures, but there are very few studies comparing it with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG).

Objective: To determine the accuracy of non-expert use of the CFM and to assess interobserver agreement of CFM seizure detection.

Patients: Babies admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at King's College Hospital who were at high risk of seizure and had video-EEG monitoring.

Methods: Video-EEG was used to detect seizures. Each baby had CFM recordings at speeds of 6, 15, and 30 cm/h during the EEG. Four neonatologists, trained in CFM seizure recognition, independently rated one hour CFM samples at three speeds from each baby. Interobserver agreement was quantified using Cohen's κ.

Results: CFM traces from 19 babies with EEG seizures and 21 babies without EEG seizures were analysed. Overall non-expert interpretation of the CFM performed poorly as a seizure detector compared with simultaneous EEG (sensitivities 38% at 6 cm/h; 54% at 15 cm/h; 55% at 30 cm/h). Although babies with seizures were more likely to be correctly classified at higher speeds (p = 0.02), babies without seizures were also more likely to be misclassified (p < 0.001). Agreement between observers was not good at any speed (κ values from 0.01 to 0.39). The observers usually detected generalised seizures but often missed seizures that were focal, low amplitude, or lasted less than one minute.

Conclusion: Approximately half of all neonatal seizures may be missed using CFM alone. Neonatal seizures need to be diagnosed, characterised, and quantified first using EEG. The CFM may then be useful for long term monitoring.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (301.8 KB).

Figure 1 .

Figure 1

Baby S: a moderately abnormal background electroencephalogram (EEG) with more than 10 seizures an hour which were not detected with the cerebral function monitor (CFM) because they were of low voltage. (A) CFM trace (6 cm/h); (B) background EEG pattern; (C) seizures on EEG.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archbald F., Verma U. L., Tejani N. A., Handwerker S. M. Cerebral function monitor in the neonate. II: Birth asphyxia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984 Apr;26(2):162–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1984.tb04427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boylan G. B., Pressler R. M., Rennie J. M., Morton M., Leow P. L., Hughes R., Binnie C. D. Outcome of electroclinical, electrographic, and clinical seizures in the newborn infant. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999 Dec;41(12):819–825. doi: 10.1017/s0012162299001632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boylan G. B., Rennie J. M., Pressler R. M., Wilson G., Morton M., Binnie C. D. Phenobarbitone, neonatal seizures, and video-EEG. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 May;86(3):F165–F170. doi: 10.1136/fn.86.3.F165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clancy R. R., Legido A. The exact ictal and interictal duration of electroencephalographic neonatal seizures. Epilepsia. 1987 Sep-Oct;28(5):537–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1987.tb03685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eaton D. M., Toet M., Livingston J., Smith I., Levene M. Evaluation of the Cerebro Trac 2500 for monitoring of cerebral function in the neonatal intensive care. Neuropediatrics. 1994 Jun;25(3):122–128. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1071598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hellström-Westas L., Rosén I., Svenningsen N. W. Predictive value of early continuous amplitude integrated EEG recordings on outcome after severe birth asphyxia in full term infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F34–F38. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Klebermass K., Kuhle S., Kohlhauser-Vollmuth C., Pollak A., Weninger M. Evaluation of the Cerebral Function Monitor as a tool for neurophysiological surveillance in neonatal intensive care patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2001 Sep;17(9):544–550. doi: 10.1007/s003810100488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maynard D., Prior P. F., Scott D. F. Device for continuous monitoring of cerebral activity in resuscitated patients. Br Med J. 1969 Nov 29;4(5682):545–546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5682.545-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Painter M. J., Scher M. S., Stein A. D., Armatti S., Wang Z., Gardiner J. C., Paneth N., Minnigh B., Alvin J. Phenobarbital compared with phenytoin for the treatment of neonatal seizures. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 12;341(7):485–489. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908123410704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scher M. S., Hamid M. Y., Steppe D. A., Beggarly M. E., Painter M. J. Ictal and interictal electrographic seizure durations in preterm and term neonates. Epilepsia. 1993 Mar-Apr;34(2):284–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb02412.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thornberg E., Ekström-Jodal B. Cerebral function monitoring: a method of predicting outcome in term neonates after severe perinatal asphyxia. Acta Paediatr. 1994 Jun;83(6):596–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Toet Mona C., van der Meij Wil, de Vries Linda S., Uiterwaal Cuno S. P. M., van Huffelen Kees C. Comparison between simultaneously recorded amplitude integrated electroencephalogram (cerebral function monitor) and standard electroencephalogram in neonates. Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):772–779. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. al Naqeeb N., Edwards A. D., Cowan F. M., Azzopardi D. Assessment of neonatal encephalopathy by amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun;103(6 Pt 1):1263–1271. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.6.1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES