Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2004 Jul;89(4):F321–F324. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.021931

Neonatal research: the parental perspective

B Stenson, J Becher, N McIntosh
PMCID: PMC1721715  PMID: 15210665

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the recollections of parents consenting for their infants to be research subjects and determine their views about the need for consent.

Subjects: Parents of 154 sick newborn infants enrolled in a randomised trial in the early neonatal period. All parents had given written consent and received printed information.

Methods: A questionnaire and accompanying letter was sent to the parental home 18 months later. Non-responders were sent a further questionnaire and letter.

Results: Response rate was 64% (99/154). Some respondents (12%) did not remember being asked to consent to their baby joining a study, and a further 6% were unsure. Most of the respondents (79%) were happy, 13% neutral, and 8% unhappy with their decision to give consent. None felt heavy pressure to agree. Entering the trial caused 24% of respondents to feel more anxious, 56% neutral, and 20% less anxious about their baby. Most of the respondents (83%) would be unhappy to forgo the consent process for trials passed by the institutional ethics committee.

Conclusions: A significant proportion of parents who give written consent for a trial in the early neonatal period do not later remember having done so. Parents who have had experience of neonatal research would be unhappy for their baby to be enrolled in a study that had ethics committee approval without their consent being obtained.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burgess E., Singhal N., Amin H., McMillan D. D., Devrome H. Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jul;88(4):F280–F286. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.4.F280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell H., Boyd K. M., Surry S. A. Informed consent. Journals should require routine reporting of consent rates. BMJ. 1997 Jul 26;315(7102):247–247. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallo C., Perrone F., De Placido S., Giusti C. Informed versus randomised consent to clinical trials. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1060–1064. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91741-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harth S. C., Thong Y. H. Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Jun;40(11):1573–1577. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00412-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harth S. C., Thong Y. H. Sociodemographic and motivational characteristics of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study. BMJ. 1990 May 26;300(6736):1372–1375. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6736.1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ingelfinger F. J. Informed (but uneducated) consent. N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 31;287(9):465–466. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197208312870912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lantos J. D. The "inclusion benefit" in clinical trials. J Pediatr. 1999 Feb;134(2):130–131. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70400-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Larson E., McGuire D. B. Patient experiences with research in a tertiary care setting. Nurs Res. 1990 May-Jun;39(3):168–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Levene M., Wright I., Griffiths G. Is informed consent in neonatal randomised controlled trials ritual? Lancet. 1996 Feb 17;347(8999):475–475. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mason S. A., Allmark P. J. Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study. Lancet. 2000 Dec 16;356(9247):2045–2051. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03401-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mason S. Obtaining informed consent for neonatal randomised controlled trials--an "elaborate ritual"? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 May;76(3):F143–F145. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.3.f143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McIntosh N., Bates P., Brykczynska G., Dunstan G., Goldman A., Harvey D., Larcher V., McCrae D., McKinnon A., Patton M. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Royal College of Paediatrics, Child Health: Ethics Advisory Committee. Arch Dis Child. 2000 Feb;82(2):177–182. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Modi N. Clinical trials and neonatal intensive care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 May;70(3):F231–F232. doi: 10.1136/fn.70.3.f231-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perlman N. B., Freedman J. L., Abramovitch R., Whyte H., Kirpalani H., Perlman M. Informational needs of parents of sick neonates. Pediatrics. 1991 Sep;88(3):512–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Redshaw M. E., Harris A. Maternal perceptions of neonatal care. Acta Paediatr. 1995 Jun;84(6):593–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Silverman W. A. The myth of informed consent: in daily practice and in clinical trials. J Med Ethics. 1989 Mar;15(1):6–11. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith R. Babies and consent: yet another NHS scandal. But it should lead to improvements in research governance within the NHS. BMJ. 2000 May 13;320(7245):1285–1286. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Snowdon C., Elbourne D., Garcia J. Zelen randomization: attitudes of parents participating in a neonatal clinical trial. Control Clin Trials. 1999 Apr;20(2):149–171. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00049-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Snowdon C., Garcia J., Elbourne D. Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Nov;45(9):1337–1355. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00063-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stenson B. J., Glover R. M., Wilkie R. A., Laing I. A., Tarnow-Mordi W. O. Randomised controlled trial of respiratory system compliance measurements in mechanically ventilated neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Jan;78(1):F15–F19. doi: 10.1136/fn.78.1.f15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tobias J. S. BMJ's present policy (sometimes approving research in which patients have not given fully informed consent) is wholly correct. BMJ. 1997 Apr 12;314(7087):1111–1114. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Walterspiel J. N. Informed consent: influence on patient selection among critically ill premature infants. Pediatrics. 1990 Jan;85(1):119–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams C. J., Zwitter M. Informed consent in European multicentre randomised clinical trials--are patients really informed? Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(7):907–910. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90111-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zelen M. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1979 May 31;300(22):1242–1245. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197905313002203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES