Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2004 Jul;89(4):F356–F359. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.033548

Evaluation of "point of care" devices in the measurement of low blood glucose in neonatal practice

H Ho, W Yeung, B Young
PMCID: PMC1721720  PMID: 15210675

Abstract

Background: Low blood glucose in newborns is difficult to detect clinically. Hence a reliable "point of care" device (glucometer) for early detection and treatment of low glucose is needed.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of five readily available glucometers for the detection of low blood glucose in newborn infants.

Method: Glucostix measurements were taken for newborns with risk factors using a Reflolux S (Boehringer) glucometer. If the initial reading was low (< 2.6 mmol/l), further measurements were taken with two other glucometers (phase I, Advantage and Glucotrend (Roche); phase II, Elite XL (Bayer) and Precision (Abbott)), and plasma glucose was measured in the laboratory (Aeroset; Abbott).

Results: Over 10 months, 101 specimens were collected from 71 newborns (57 in phase I; 44 in phase II). The Advantage glucometer usually overestimated blood glucose with a mean difference of 1.07 mmol/l (p < 0.01) at all low glucose ranges. The Glucotrend, Precision, and Elite XL glucometers performed better; the mean differences were not significantly different from the laboratory measured value (0.17 mmol/l (p  =  0.37); –0.12 mmol/l (p  =  0.13), and 0.24 mmol/l (p  =  0.13) respectively). For detection of glucose concentrations < 2.6 mmol/l, the Precision glucometer had the highest sensitivity (96.4%) and negative predictive value (90%). For lower glucose concentrations (< 2.0 mmol/l), the Glucotrend glucometer performed even better (sensitivity 92.3%, negative predictive value 96.3%).

Conclusion: Point of care devices should have good precision in the low glucose concentration range, sensitivity, and accuracy for early detection of neonatal hypoglycaemia. None of the five glucometers was satisfactory as the sole measuring device. The Glucotrend and Precision glucometers have the greatest sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, confirmation with laboratory measurements of plasma glucose and clinical assessment are still of the utmost importance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.2 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

 Capillary blood glucose (glucometer) versus plasma glucose (hexokinase method). The glucose concentration obtained using the glucometer minus the plasma glucose concentration measured by the hexokinase method is plotted against the mean of the two values. (A) Glucotrend; (B) Advantage; (C) Reflolux S; (D) Elite XL; (E) Precision; (F) Reflolux S.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baumeister F. A., Rolinski B., Busch R., Emmrich P. Glucose monitoring with long-term subcutaneous microdialysis in neonates. Pediatrics. 2001 Nov;108(5):1187–1192. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.5.1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cornblath M., Hawdon J. M., Williams A. F., Aynsley-Green A., Ward-Platt M. P., Schwartz R., Kalhan S. C. Controversies regarding definition of neonatal hypoglycemia: suggested operational thresholds. Pediatrics. 2000 May;105(5):1141–1145. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.5.1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duvanel C. B., Fawer C. L., Cotting J., Hohlfeld P., Matthieu J. M. Long-term effects of neonatal hypoglycemia on brain growth and psychomotor development in small-for-gestational-age preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1999 Apr;134(4):492–498. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70209-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellis M., Manandhar D. S., Manandhar N., Land J. M., Patel N., de L Costello A. M. Comparison of two cotside methods for the detection of hypoglycaemia among neonates in Nepal. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Sep;75(2):F122–F125. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.2.f122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gabriely I., Wozniak R., Mevorach M., Kaplan J., Aharon Y., Shamoon H. Transcutaneous glucose measurement using near-infrared spectroscopy during hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 1999 Dec;22(12):2026–2032. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.12.2026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Girouard J., Forest J. C., Massé J., Leroux M., Bradburn N. C., Noblet T. C., Joynes J. O., Baum J. Multicenter evaluation of the Glucometer Elite XL meter, an instrument specifically designed for use with neonates. Diabetes Care. 2000 Aug;23(8):1149–1153. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.8.1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaplan M., Blondheim O., Alon I., Eylath U., Trestian S., Eidelman A. I. Screening for hypoglycemia with plasma in neonatal blood of high hematocrit value. Crit Care Med. 1989 Mar;17(3):279–282. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198903000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirkham P., Watkins A. Comparison of two reflectance photometers in the assessment of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Nov;73(3):F170–F173. doi: 10.1136/fn.73.3.f170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koh T. H., Aynsley-Green A., Tarbit M., Eyre J. A. Neural dysfunction during hypoglycaemia. Arch Dis Child. 1988 Nov;63(11):1353–1358. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.11.1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lucas A., Morley R., Cole T. J. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome of moderate neonatal hypoglycaemia. BMJ. 1988 Nov 19;297(6659):1304–1308. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6659.1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McNamara P. J., Sharief N. Comparison of EML 105 and advantage analysers measuring capillary versus venous whole blood glucose in neonates. Acta Paediatr. 2001 Sep;90(9):1033–1041. doi: 10.1080/080352501316978129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meloy L., Miller G., Chandrasekaran M. H., Summitt C., Gutcher G. Accuracy of glucose reflectance testing for detecting hypoglycemia in term newborns. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1999 Dec;38(12):717–724. doi: 10.1177/000992289903801204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Papp M., Sharief N. Comparison of two strip test methods of whole blood glucose measurement in the neonatal period. Acta Paediatr. 2001 Sep;90(9):1042–1046. doi: 10.1080/080352501316978138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Poirier J. Y., Le Prieur N., Campion L., Guilhem I., Allannic H., Maugendre D. Clinical and statistical evaluation of self-monitoring blood glucose meters. Diabetes Care. 1998 Nov;21(11):1919–1924. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.11.1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Presti B., Kircher T., Reed C. Capillary blood glucose monitor. Evaluation in a newborn nursery. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1989 Sep;28(9):412–415. doi: 10.1177/000992288902800907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Trajanoski Z., Brunner G. A., Gfrerer R. J., Wach P., Pieber T. R. Accuracy of home blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 1996 Dec;19(12):1412–1415. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.12.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams A. F. Hypoglycaemia of the newborn: a review. Bull World Health Organ. 1997;75(3):261–290. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES