Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2004 Jul;89(4):F360–F363. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.019448

The neorule: a new instrument to measure linear growth in preterm infants

C Lawn, R Chavasse, K Booth, M Angeles, F Weir
PMCID: PMC1721729  PMID: 15210676

Abstract

Objectives: To compare measurements of crown-heel length (CHL) made with the neorule with CHL measurements made with a stadiometer in term infants. To examine safety and reproducibility of CHL measurements in infants < 32 weeks gestational age (GA) using the neorule.

Methods: Three measurements of CHL were made by three teams during the first 2 days of life in healthy term infants. One team used the stadiometer and two the neorule. Two different teams made three measurements of CHL on four occasions at two week intervals in infants less than 32 weeks GA. Infants were continuously monitored, and any adverse event was recorded.

Results: Fifty term infants were studied, median (range) birth weight 3440 (2020–5010) g. The mean (SD, 95% confidence interval) difference between values obtained with the stadiometer and neorule was 0.08 (6.22, –1.69 to +1.85) mm and between the two neorule teams was 0.8 (4.48, –0.47 to +2.08) mm. Twenty preterm infants were studied, GA median (range) 29 (25+0–31+6) weeks, median (range) CHL 397 (339–475) mm. There were no adverse events. The difference (SD, 95%CI) between teams in the mean CHL measurement was 0.18 (4.79, –1.02 to +1.38) mm, with interobserver limit of agreement –9.2 to +9.6 mm and coefficient of variation 1.2%. There were no significant differences between measurements made by single observers; the F ratio was 0.449 (df  =  61, p  =  0.6).

Conclusion: The neorule is a safe and accurate way to measure CHL in newborn infants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.7 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

 The neorule.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

 Term infant study. Bland-Altman plot of the difference between crown-heel length (CHL) measurements made by team 1 (using the stadiometer) and team 2 (using the neorule) against the mean of those two CHL measurements.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

 Term infant study. Bland-Altman plot of the differences in crown-heel length (CHL) measurements made by team 2 and team 3 both using the neorule against the mean of those two CHL measurements.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

 Preterm infant study. Bland-Altman plot of the difference between paired crown-heel length (CHL) measurements (mm) made by team 1 and team 2 against the mean of those two CHL measurements.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

 Preterm infant study. Bland-Altman plot of the differences between the first and second and second and third crown-heel length (CHL) measurements by single observers against the mean of those three measurements of CHL.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Babson S. G., Bramhall J. L. Diet and growth in the premature infant. The effect of different dietary intakes of ash-electrolyte and protein on weight gain and linear growth. J Pediatr. 1969 Jun;74(6):890–900. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(69)80223-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Babson S. G. Growth of low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr. 1970 Jul;77(1):11–18. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(70)80039-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooke O. G., Alvear J., Arnold M. Energy retention, energy expenditure, and growth in healthy immature infants. Pediatr Res. 1979 Apr;13(4 Pt 1):215–220. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197904000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooke O. G., Onubogu O., Heath R., Carter N. D. Human milk and preterm formula compared for effects on growth and metabolism. Arch Dis Child. 1987 Sep;62(9):917–923. doi: 10.1136/adc.62.9.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooke R. J., Perrin F., Moore J., Paule C., Ruckman K. Methodology of nutrient balance studies in the preterm infant. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 May-Jun;7(3):434–440. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198805000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooke R. W., Lucas A., Yudkin P. L., Pryse-Davies J. Head circumference as an index of brain weight in the fetus and newborn. Early Hum Dev. 1977 Oct;1(2):145–149. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(77)90015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies D. P., Holding R. E. Neonatometer: a new infant length measurer. Arch Dis Child. 1972 Dec;47(256):938–940. doi: 10.1136/adc.47.256.938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibson A. T., Pearse R. G., Wales J. K. Growth retardation after dexamethasone administration: assessment by knemometry. Arch Dis Child. 1993 Nov;69(5 Spec No):505–509. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.5_spec_no.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibson A. T., Pearse R. G., Wales J. K. Knemometry and the assessment of growth in premature babies. Arch Dis Child. 1993 Nov;69(5 Spec No):498–504. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.5_spec_no.498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Griffin I. J., Pang N. M., Perring J., Cooke R. J. Knee-heel length measurement in healthy preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999 Jul;81(1):F50–F55. doi: 10.1136/fn.81.1.f50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hermanussen M., Seele K. Mini-knemometry: an accurate technique for lower leg length measurements in early childhood. Ann Hum Biol. 1997 Jul-Aug;24(4):307–313. doi: 10.1080/03014469700005052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. James D. K., Dryburgh E. H., Chiswick M. L. Foot length--a new and potentially useful measurement in the neonate. Arch Dis Child. 1979 Mar;54(3):226–230. doi: 10.1136/adc.54.3.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson T. S., Engstrom J. L., Warda J. A., Kabat M., Peters B. Reliability of length measurements in full-term neonates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998 May-Jun;27(3):270–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02649.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Michaelsen K. F., Skov L., Badsberg J. H., Jørgensen M. Short-term measurement of linear growth in preterm infants: validation of a hand-held knemometer. Pediatr Res. 1991 Nov;30(5):464–468. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199111000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosenberg S. N., Verzo B., Engstrom J. L., Kavanaugh K., Meier P. P. Reliability of length measurements for preterm infants. Neonatal Netw. 1992 Mar;11(2):23–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith R. A., Newcombe R. G., Coggins A. M., Gray O. P. Length measurement in small neonates. Arch Dis Child. 1985 Sep;60(9):837–839. doi: 10.1136/adc.60.9.837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES