Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2004 Jul;89(4):F325–F327. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.034322

Variability of four limb blood pressure in normal neonates

D Crossland, J Furness, M Abu-Harb, S Sadagopan, C Wren
PMCID: PMC1721730  PMID: 15210667

Abstract

Aims: To assess the variation in blood pressure (BP) between limbs in normal neonates. To assess whether comparison of arm and leg BP in neonates is reproducible enough to allow the difference to raise suspicion of coarctation of the aorta.

Methods: Infants recruited from the postnatal wards and the postnatal murmur clinic underwent echocardiography and BP measurement in each limb using a Dinamap Compact T 482210. The method of BP measurement was guided by a telephone survey of 40 UK neonatal units.

Results: Forty healthy neonates underwent echocardiography and all had a normal aortic arch. BP was measured in 39. In three, BP in the arms was 20 mm Hg higher than in the legs. This gave a specificity of comparison of the upper and lower limb BPs of 92 (36/39) or a false positive rate of 8% (3/39). The standard deviation in BPs was 15.7 mm Hg between arms, 14.5 mm Hg between legs, and 11 mm Hg when the nearest arm and leg were compared.

Conclusions: With current measurement techniques, normal neonates may have a wide variation in BP between limbs. A difference of 20 mm Hg in isolation is more likely to be due to random variability in measurement than to coarctation of the aorta. If coarctation of the aorta is suspected, it can only be excluded or confirmed by echocardiography.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (76.3 KB).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

 Comparison of right arm and right leg blood pressure (BP) measurements. The mean of the arm and leg BP is plotted against the difference between the measurements (right arm – right leg).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

 Comparison of nearest arm and leg blood pressure (BP) measurements. The mean of the two measurements is plotted against the difference between the measurements (arm – leg). All those with a difference of more than 20 mm Hg are considered positive results.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker M. D., Maisels M. J., Marks K. H. Indirect BP monitoring in the newborn. Evaluation of a new oscillometer and comparison of upper- and lower-limb measurements. Am J Dis Child. 1984 Aug;138(8):775–778. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140460065021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GOLDRING D., WOHLTMANN H. Flush method for blood pressure determinations in newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1952 Mar;40(3):285–289. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(52)80257-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kunk R., McCain G. C. Comparison of upper arm and calf oscillometric blood pressure measurement in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2 Pt 1):89–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MOSS A. J., LIEBLING W., ADAMS F. H. The flush method for determining blood pressures in infants. II. Normal values during the first year of life. Pediatrics. 1958 Jun;21(6):950–957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Piazza S. F., Chandra M., Harper R. G., Sia C. G., McVicar M., Huang H. Upper- vs lower-limb systolic blood pressure in full-term normal newborns. Am J Dis Child. 1985 Aug;139(8):797–799. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140100059030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tan K. L. Blood pressure in full-term healthy neonates. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1987 Jan;26(1):21–24. doi: 10.1177/000992288702600103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ward K. E., Pryor R. W., Matson J. R., Razook J. D., Thompson W. M., Elkins R. C. Delayed detection of coarctation in infancy: implications for timing of newborn follow-up. Pediatrics. 1990 Dec;86(6):972–976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilson N., Sutherland G. R., Gibbs J. L., Dickinson D. F., Keeton B. R. Limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of neonatal coarctation of the aorta. Int J Cardiol. 1989 Apr;23(1):87–89. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(89)90333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wren C., Richmond S., Donaldson L. Temporal variability in birth prevalence of cardiovascular malformations. Heart. 2000 Apr;83(4):414–419. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.4.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. de Swiet M., Dillon M. J., Littler W., O'Brien E., Padfield P. L., Petrie J. C. Measurement of blood pressure in children. Recommendations of a working party of the British Hypertension Society. BMJ. 1989 Aug 19;299(6697):497–497. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6697.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. de Swiet M., Fayers P., Shinebourne E. A. Systolic blood pressure in a population of infants in the first year of life: the Brompton study. Pediatrics. 1980 May;65(5):1028–1035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. de Swiet M., Peto J., Shinebourne E. A. Difference between upper and lower limb blood pressure in normal neonates using Doppler technique. Arch Dis Child. 1974 Sep;49(9):734–735. doi: 10.1136/adc.49.9.734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES