Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2004 Jul;89(4):F310–F314. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.021626

Long term outcome of small versus appropriate size for gestational age co-twins/triplets

M Monset-Couchard, O de Bethmann, J Relier
PMCID: PMC1721732  PMID: 15210662

Abstract

Background: Small for gestational age (SGA) extremely low birthweight (ELBW < 1000 g) survivors often remain small and/or have subnormal school performance. Some are twins/triplets with larger appropriate size for gestational age (AGA) co-twins/triplets.

Objective: To assess whether SGA ELBW twins/triplets remain different from their AGA co-twins/triplets.

Design, setting: During 1981–1999, 353 SGA ELBW neonates were admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit: 267 survived, 54/267 were twins/triplets, and 36/54 had AGA surviving co-twins/triplets. This longitudinal study describes the growth, neurodevelopmental outcome, and school performance of these 36 sets (3–17 years). The children were classified as normal, or having minor, moderate, or severe deficiencies.

Results: Values for birth weight (mean intrapair z score difference 2.26), length (2.74), and head circumference (2.62) were lower in SGA neonates than in AGA co-twins/triplets. SGA survivors remained smaller at 3–6 years of age: mean intrapair z score difference in weight, 1.37, height, 1.54, head circumference, 1.21. From 6 to 17 years, smaller differences persisted. Former SGA children had a tendency to have motor deficiencies (nine SGA v three AGA) and mental retardation (seven v four), same hearing loss (two v two), but significantly more visual abnormalities (15 v 11), behavioural disturbances (14 v five), and speech problems (14 v eight). Twenty four sets were in the same normal level class, often supported by familial/professional help.

Conclusions: Although raised in the same environment, SGA ELBW survivors remained smaller and had more visual/behavioural/speech problems, but most maintained grade level parity with their AGA siblings, with appropriate help.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (73.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chaussain J. L., Colle M., Ducret J. P. Adult height in children with prepubertal short stature secondary to intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1994 Apr;399:72–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13294.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gutbrod T., Wolke D., Soehne B., Ohrt B., Riegel K. Effects of gestation and birth weight on the growth and development of very low birthweight small for gestational age infants: a matched group comparison. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000 May;82(3):F208–F214. doi: 10.1136/fn.82.3.F208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hediger M. L., Overpeck M. D., Maurer K. R., Kuczmarski R. J., McGlynn A., Davis W. W. Growth of infants and young children born small or large for gestational age: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Dec;152(12):1225–1231. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.12.1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Henrichsen L., Skinhøj K., Andersen G. E. Delayed growth and reduced intelligence in 9-17 year old intrauterine growth retarded children compared with their monozygous co-twins. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986 Jan;75(1):31–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1986.tb10153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hutton J. L., Pharoah P. O., Cooke R. W., Stevenson R. C. Differential effects of preterm birth and small gestational age on cognitive and motor development. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Mar;76(2):F75–F81. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.2.f75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Karlberg J., Luo Z. C. Foetal size to final height. Acta Paediatr. 2000 Jun;89(6):632–636. doi: 10.1080/080352500750043909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Keet M. P., Jaroszewicz A. M., Lombard C. J. Follow-up study of physical growth of monozygous twins with discordant within-pair birth weights. Pediatrics. 1986 Mar;77(3):336–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LUBCHENCO L. O., HANSMAN C., DRESSLER M., BOYD E. INTRAUTERINE GROWTH AS ESTIMATED FROM LIVEBORN BIRTH-WEIGHT DATA AT 24 TO 42 WEEKS OF GESTATION. Pediatrics. 1963 Nov;32:793–800. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Larroque B., Bertrais S., Czernichow P., Léger J. School difficulties in 20-year-olds who were born small for gestational age at term in a regional cohort study. Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):111–115. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McCarton C. M., Wallace I. F., Divon M., Vaughan H. G., Jr Cognitive and neurologic development of the premature, small for gestational age infant through age 6: comparison by birth weight and gestational age. Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1167–1178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Monset-Couchard M., de Bethmann O. Catch-up growth in 166 small-for- gestational age premature infants weighing less than 1,000 g at birth. Biol Neonate. 2000 Oct;78(3):161–167. doi: 10.1159/000014265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Monset-Couchard M., de Bethmann O., Kastler B. Mid- and long-term outcome of 166 premature infants weighing less than 1,000 g at birth, all small for gestational age. Biol Neonate. 2002;81(4):244–254. doi: 10.1159/000056755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morley R., Brooke O. G., Cole T. J., Powell R., Lucas A. Birthweight ratio and outcome in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child. 1990 Jan;65(1 Spec No):30–34. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.1_spec_no.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nellhaus G. Head circumference from birth to eighteen years. Practical composite international and interracial graphs. Pediatrics. 1968 Jan;41(1):106–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pena I. C., Teberg A. J., Finello K. M. The premature small-for-gestational-age infant during the first year of life: comparison by birth weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1988 Dec;113(6):1066–1073. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80584-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peralta-Carcelen M., Jackson D. S., Goran M. I., Royal S. A., Mayo M. S., Nelson K. G. Growth of adolescents who were born at extremely low birth weight without major disability. J Pediatr. 2000 May;136(5):633–640. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.104291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Robertson C. M., Etches P. C., Kyle J. M. Eight-year school performance and growth of preterm, small for gestational age infants: a comparative study with subjects matched for birth weight or for gestational age. J Pediatr. 1990 Jan;116(1):19–26. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81639-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sommerfelt K., Andersson H. W., Sonnander K., Ahlsten G., Ellertsen B., Markestad T., Jacobsen G., Hoffman H. J., Bakketeig L. Cognitive development of term small for gestational age children at five years of age. Arch Dis Child. 2000 Jul;83(1):25–30. doi: 10.1136/adc.83.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sommerfelt K., Ellertsen B., Markestad T. Parental factors in cognitive outcome of non-handicapped low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Nov;73(3):F135–F142. doi: 10.1136/fn.73.3.f135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sung I. K., Vohr B., Oh W. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants with intrauterine growth retardation: comparison with control subjects matched by birth weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1993 Oct;123(4):618–624. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80965-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Teranishi H., Nakagawa H., Marmot M. Social class difference in catch up growth in a national British cohort. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Mar;84(3):218–221. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.3.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Warner B. B., Kiely J. L., Donovan E. F. Multiple births and outcome. Clin Perinatol. 2000 Jun;27(2):347-61, ix. doi: 10.1016/s0095-5108(05)70025-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Weisglas-Kuperus N., Baerts W., Smrkovsky M., Sauer P. J. Effects of biological and social factors on the cognitive development of very low birth weight children. Pediatrics. 1993 Nov;92(5):658–665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zucchini S., Cacciari E., Balsamo A., Cicognani A., Tassinari D., Barbieri E., Gualandi S. Final height of short subjects of low birth weight with and without growth hormone treatment. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Apr;84(4):340–343. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.4.340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES