Abstract
Objectives: To determine the number and characteristics of inter-hospital transfers of newborn infants in London and the South East of England.
Design: Prospective census of neonatal transfers over a three month period.
Setting: Transfers between the 53 hospitals that provide care for newborn infants within the former Thames regions.
Data sources: Census returns from participating neonatal units.
Main outcome measures: Number, timing, and hours of staff time spent on transfers. Gestation, birth weight, and reason for transfer of the baby. Time elapsed between request and retrieving team departing and arriving with patient.
Results: A daily average of 2.7 urgent, 3.5 elective, and 0.7 short term transfers took place during the census period. The most common reason for urgent transfer was neonatal surgery. Neonatal unit staff spent an average of 21 hours a day off their units accompanying transfers each day. It took over four hours for 90% of ambulances to set off with the retrieving team and over six hours for 90% of teams to reach the baby.
Conclusions: During the census period, services for the transport of neonates in London and the South East of England involved long delays and used appreciable amounts of staff time. It is likely that a small number of dedicated neonatal transfer teams could meet the needs identified in this census more effectively than the 53 hospitals currently involved.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (145.0 KB).
Figure 1.
Geographical area covered by the census. Patient flows are indicated as numbers during the three month census travelling between or within each area (red, urgent; blue, elective).
Figure 2.
Daily transfer activity. Frequency distribution of the daily number of transfers, with the cumulative percentage distribution shown on the right y axis.
Figure 3.
Time elapsed after the need and destination of transfer had been confirmed. Values are the number of retrievals in each time window, firstly for the arrival of the ambulance with the transferring team and secondly for the time elapsed from the call to the team arriving with the patient. Cumulative percentage curves are also shown.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barbier M. L., Chabernaud J. L., Lavaud J., Février Y. M., Johanet S. Les transports médicalisés urgents en pédiatrie dans la région Ile-de-France. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1987 Jun-Jul;44(6):413–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branger B., Chaperon J., Mouzard A., Picherot G., Kerbaol M. Le transfert hospitalier des nouveau-nés dans le département de Loire-Atlantique (France). Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1994;42(4):307–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Field D., Milligan D., Skeoch C., Stephenson T. Neonatal transport: time to change? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Jan;76(1):F1–F2. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.1.f1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- James A. G. Resuscitation, stabilization, and transport in perinatology. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1993 Apr;5(2):150–155. doi: 10.1097/00008480-199304000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leslie A. J., Stephenson T. J. Audit of neonatal intensive care transport--closing the loop. Acta Paediatr. 1997 Nov;86(11):1253–1256. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb14856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leslie A., Stephenson T. Neonatal transfers by advanced neonatal nurse practitioners and paediatric registrars. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Nov;88(6):F509–F512. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.6.F509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacFaul R., Werneke U. Recent trends in hospital use by children in England. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Sep;85(3):203–207. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.3.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parmanum J., Field D., Rennie J., Steer P. National census of availability of neonatal intensive care. British Association for Perinatal Medicine. BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):727–729. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]