Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2005 Sep;90(5):F374–F379. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.047902

Prevalence of congenital anomalies in five British regions, 1991–99

J Rankin, S Pattenden, L Abramsky, P Boyd, H Jordan, D Stone, M Vrijheid, D Wellesley, H Dolk
PMCID: PMC1721948  PMID: 16113153

Abstract

Aims: To describe trends in total and live birth prevalence, regional differences in prevalence, and outcome of pregnancy of selected congenital anomalies.

Methods: Population based registry study of 839 521 births to mothers resident in five geographical areas of Britain during 1991–99. Main outcome measures were: total and live birth prevalence; pregnancy outcome; proportion of stillbirths due to congenital anomalies; and secular trends.

Results: The sample consisted of 10 844 congenital anomalies, giving a total prevalence of 129 per 10 000 registered births (95% CI 127 to 132). Live birth prevalence was 82.2 per 10 000 births (95% CI 80.3 to 84.2) and declined significantly with time. The proportion of all stillbirths with a congenital anomaly was 10.5% (453 stillbirths). The proportion of pregnancies resulting in a termination increased from 27% (289 cases) in 1991 to 34.7% (384 cases) in 1999, whereas the proportion of live births declined from 68.2% (730 cases) to 58.5% (648 cases). Although similar rates of congenital anomaly groups were notified to the registers, variation in rates by register was present. There was a secular decline in the total prevalence of non-chromosomal and an increase in chromosomal anomalies.

Conclusions: Regional variation exists in the prevalence of specific congenital anomalies. For some anomalies this can be partially explained by ascertainment variation. For others (neural tube defects, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis), higher prevalence rates in the northern regions (Glasgow and Northern) were true differences. Live birth prevalence declined over the study due to an increase in terminations of pregnancy.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (87.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell J. A. The epidemiology of Down's syndrome. Med J Aust. 1991 Jul 15;155(2):115–117. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1991.tb142143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell R., Glinianaia S. V., Rankin J., Wright C., Pearce M. S., Parker L. Changing patterns of perinatal death, 1982-2000: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Nov;89(6):F531–F536. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.038414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyd P. A., Chamberlain P., Hicks N. R. 6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK. Lancet. 1998 Nov 14;352(9140):1577–1581. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03202-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chalmers J., Forrest J., Cant B., Hollinsworth M. Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects. Rate of abdominal wall defects is higher in Scotland than England and Wales. BMJ. 1997 Feb 1;314(7077):371–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dastgiri S., Stone D. H., Le-Ha C., Gilmour W. H. Prevalence and secular trend of congenital anomalies in Glasgow, UK. Arch Dis Child. 2002 Apr;86(4):257–263. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.4.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hobbs C. A., Hopkins S. E., Simmons C. J. Sources of variability in birth defects prevalence rates. Teratology. 2001;64 (Suppl 1):S8–S13. doi: 10.1002/tera.1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rankin J., Dillon E., Wright C. Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in the north of England, 1986-1996: occurrence and outcome. Prenat Diagn. 1999 Jul;19(7):662–668. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199907)19:7<662::aid-pd607>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rankin J., Glinianaia S., Brown R., Renwick M. The changing prevalence of neural tube defects: a population-based study in the north of England, 1984-96. Northern Congenital Abnormality Survey Steering Group. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;14(2):104–110. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stone D. H., Hamilton F. M. Uses and limitations of registers of congenital malformations: a case-study. Public Health. 1987 May;101(3):191–197. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(87)80067-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stone D. H., Rimaz S., Gilmour W. H. Prevalence of congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in the United Kingdom: comparison of regional registers. BMJ. 1998 Oct 24;317(7166):1118–1119. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stone D. H., Smalls M. J., Rosenberg K., Womersley J. Screening for congenital neural tube defects in a high-risk area: an epidemiological perspective. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1988 Sep;42(3):271–273. doi: 10.1136/jech.42.3.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Torfs C. P., Velie E. M., Oechsli F. W., Bateson T. F., Curry C. J. A population-based study of gastroschisis: demographic, pregnancy, and lifestyle risk factors. Teratology. 1994 Jul;50(1):44–53. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420500107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wellesley D., Boyd P., Dolk H., Pattenden S. An aetiological classification of birth defects for epidemiological research. J Med Genet. 2005 Jan;42(1):54–57. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.023309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Womersley J., Stone D. H. Epidemiology of facial clefts. Arch Dis Child. 1987 Jul;62(7):717–720. doi: 10.1136/adc.62.7.717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES