Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition
. 2005 Nov;90(6):F480–F483. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.069351

Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised control study

S Yong, S Chen, N Boo
PMCID: PMC1721971  PMID: 15941825

Abstract

Objective: To compare the incidence of nasal trauma associated with the use of prong or mask during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) support in very low birthweight (<1501 g) infants.

Design: Randomised controlled clinical trial.

Setting: Tertiary care university hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Methods: All very low birthweight infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit between July 2001 and December 2003 who received nCPAP through the Infant Flow Driver were randomised to the use of either nasal prong or mask. The nasal cavity of these infants was inspected daily during the first week and then weekly until they were weaned off nCPAP.

Results: Of the 89 infants recruited, 41 were randomised to the mask group and 48 to the prong group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nasal trauma between the two groups (p = 0.5). The primary site of trauma was at the junction between the nasal septum and the philtrum in infants in the mask group and the walls of the nasal septum in the prong group. Logistic regression analysis showed that duration of nCPAP was the only significant risk factor associated with development of nasal injury, after birth weight, gestational age, and nasal device used had been controlled for (adjusted odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.07; p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Irrespective of the type of nasal device used, nasal trauma is common during nCPAP treatment, which should therefore be terminated as soon as possible.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (79.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chernick V. Continuous distending pressure in hyaline membrane disease: of devices, disadvantages, and a daring study. Pediatrics. 1973 Jul;52(1):114–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox J. M., Boehm J. J., Millare E. A. Individual nasal masks and intranasal tubes. A non-invasive neonatal technique for the delivery of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Anaesthesia. 1974 Sep;29(5):597–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1974.tb00726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dimitriou G., Greenough A., Kavvadia V., Laubscher B., Alexiou C., Pavlou V., Mantagos S. Elective use of nasal continuous positive airways pressure following extubation of preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2000 Jun;159(6):434–439. doi: 10.1007/s004310051302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gittermann M. K., Fusch C., Gittermann A. R., Regazzoni B. M., Moessinger A. C. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment reduces the need for intubation in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. 1997 May;156(5):384–388. doi: 10.1007/s004310050620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kattwinkel J., Fleming D., Cha C. C., Fanaroff A. A., Klaus M. H. A device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure by the nasal route. Pediatrics. 1973 Jul;52(1):131–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Robertson N. J., McCarthy L. S., Hamilton P. A., Moss A. L. Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Nov;75(3):F209–F212. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.3.f209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SILVERMAN W. A., ANDERSEN D. H. A controlled clinical trial of effects of water mist on obstructive respiratory signs, death rate and necropsy findings among premature infants. Pediatrics. 1956 Jan;17(1):1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES