Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1997 Jan;81(1):37–40. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.1.37

Bacteriology of lacrimal duct obstruction in adults

J Hartikainen 1, O Lehtonen 1, K Saari 1
PMCID: PMC1721992  PMID: 9135406

Abstract

AIMS—To determine the current bacteriology of lacrimal duct obstruction (LDO) and to relate the bacteriological findings to the type of symptoms.
METHODS—127 samples were obtained from the lacrimal sac in 118 consecutive adult patients with LDO, including nine bilateral cases.
RESULTS—Altogether, 156 isolates were recovered from the 127 samples cultured. Cultures were positive from 84% of the samples. Gram positive bacteria were isolated in 79 (62%) samples. The most frequently cultured bacterial species was Staphylococcus epidermidis, representing 27% of the isolates. Gram negative bacteria were recovered from 26 (20%) samples, and these bacteria were statistically significantly more common in cases with copious discharge than in cases with minor discharge (p=0.000). Cases with simple stenosis of the lacrimal duct (SSLD) showed significantly less Streptococcus sp (p=0.004) and Gram negative organisms (p=0.004) than those with chronic dacryocystitis.
CONCLUSION—The bacteriology of SSLD resembles that of normal conjunctival flora. Chronic dacryocystitis in adults is associated with an increased proportion of Gram negative bacteria which may be a reservoir for postoperative intraocular infection. They should also be taken into account in selecting antimicrobial prophylaxis in lacrimal drainage surgery.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartley G. B. Acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction: an etiologic classification system, case reports, and a review of the literature. Part 1. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8(4):237–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blicker J. A., Buffam F. V. Lacrimal sac, conjunctival, and nasal culture results in dacryocystorhinostomy patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9(1):43–46. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199303000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CASON L., WINKLER C. H., Jr Bacteriology of the eye. I. Normal flora. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954 Feb;51(2):196–198. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1954.00920040198005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coden D. J., Hornblass A., Haas B. D. Clinical bacteriology of dacryocystitis in adults. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Jun;9(2):125–131. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199306000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fahmy J. A., Moller S., Bentzon M. W. Bacterial flora of the normal conjunctiva. I. Topographical distribution. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1974;52(6):786–800. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1974.tb01115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huber-Spitzy V., Steinkogler F. J., Huber E., Arocker-Mettinger E., Schiffbänker M. Acquired dacryocystitis: microbiology and conservative therapy. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1992 Dec;70(6):745–749. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb04880.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Linberg J. V., McCormick S. A. Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. A clinicopathologic report and biopsy technique. Ophthalmology. 1986 Aug;93(8):1055–1063. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33620-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Seal D. V., Barrett S. P., McGill J. I. Aetiology and treatment of acute bacterial infection of the external eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jun;66(6):357–360. doi: 10.1136/bjo.66.6.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thiel H. J., Schumacher U. Uber die Standortflora der menschlichen Bindehaut: Untersuchungen von 135 Personen unterschiedlichen Alters. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Dec;205(6):348–357. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1045542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Walland M. J., Rose G. E. Soft tissue infections after open lacrimal surgery. Ophthalmology. 1994 Mar;101(3):608–611. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(13)31269-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES