Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS—Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy (ELDCR) has many potential advantages over conventional external DCR. Although the short term results of this technique have been reported, little is yet known of the long term results, and the occurrence of late rhinostomy failure. The aim of this study was to examine the results at 3 and 12 months following ELDCR. METHOD—The notes of all consecutive ELDCRs performed between November 1993 and May 1995 were retrieved. Demographic information, details of surgery, and the postoperative results were noted. RESULTS—ELDCR procedures which did not undergo lacrimal stenting showed a short term success rate of 67% at 3 months, and a further failure rate of 9% at 12 months. ELDCRs which did undergo lacrimal stenting showed a short term success rate of 82% at 3 months, and a further failure rate of 21% at 12 months. Lacrimal intubation increased the long term success rate by 8%. The success rate was lower in the presence of local risk factors for nasal mucosal scarring. CONCLUSIONS—ELDCR requires some adjunctive treatment to improve maintenance of the nasal mucosal ostia if it is to compete successfully with external DCR on grounds other than cosmesis and patient convenience.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (78.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allen K., Berlin A. J. Dacryocystorhinostomy failure: association with nasolacrimal silicone intubation. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989 Jul;20(7):486–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boush G. A., Lemke B. N., Dortzbach R. K. Results of endonasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 1994 May;101(5):955–959. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31231-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dresner S. C., Klussman K. G., Meyer D. R., Linberg J. V. Outpatient dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991 Apr;22(4):222–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonnering R. S., Lyon D. B., Fisher J. C. Endoscopic laser-assisted lacrimal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Feb 15;111(2):152–157. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72252-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linberg J. V., Anderson R. L., Bumsted R. M., Barreras R. Study of intranasal ostium external dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Nov;100(11):1758–1762. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030040738005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mannor G. E., Millman A. L. The prognostic value of preoperative dacryocystography in endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Feb 15;113(2):134–137. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71524-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Massaro B. M., Gonnering R. S., Harris G. J. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. A new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Aug;108(8):1172–1176. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070100128048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sadiq S. A., Hugkulstone C. E., Jones N. S., Downes R. N. Endoscopic holmium:YAG laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye (Lond) 1996;10(Pt 1):43–46. doi: 10.1038/eye.1996.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tarbet K. J., Custer P. L. External dacryocystorhinostomy. Surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology. 1995 Jul;102(7):1065–1070. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30910-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walland M. J., Rose G. E. The effect of silicone intubation on failure and infection rates after dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994 Sep-Oct;25(9):597–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whittet H. B., Shun-Shin G. A., Awdry P. Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 4):545–549. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woog J. J., Metson R., Puliafito C. A. Holmium:YAG endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jul 15;116(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71736-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zolli C. L., Shannon G. M. Dacryocystorhinostomy: a review of 119 cases. Ophthalmic Surg. 1982 Nov;13(11):905–910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]