Abstract
AIMS—To evaluate the claim that topical proxymetacaine produces little or no discomfort on instillation by comparing it against topical amethocaine. METHODS—This randomised, masked, double blind, prospective study involved 53 consecutive patients. Each patient received one drop of amethocaine 0.5% in one eye and one drop of proxymetacaine 0.5% in the other. The duration of the stinging sensation and degree of discomfort (using descriptive and a linear analogue method) for each topical anaesthetic was assessed. RESULTS—The mean duration of stinging was 3.2 seconds for proxymetacaine and 22.1 seconds for amethocaine the difference being statistical significant (p <0.001). The mean descriptive discomfort score was 2.6 for proxymetacaine and 14.2 for amethocaine (p=0.01). The mean linear analogue score was 5.8 for proxymetacaine and 35.6 for amethocaine (p<0.001). Proxymetacaine had a successful tonometry rate of 93% and amethocaine 98%. CONCLUSION—This clinical study confirms that proxymetacaine is more comfortable on instillation than amethocaine. Minimising unnecessary patient discomfort is not only ideal, but encourages cooperation in apprehensive patients especially in children. Keywords: patient comfort; proxymetacaine; amethocaine
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (77.0 KB).
Figure 1 .
Duration of stinging sensation reported by individual patients receiving topical amethocaine and proxymetacaine.
Figure 2 .
Percentage of patients experiencing "no pain", "mild pain", "moderate pain", and "severe pain" as expressed on the descriptive discomfort scale.
Figure 3 .
Percentage of patients experiencing discomfort measured by the 100 mm unmarked linear analogue scale.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bartfield J. M., Holmes T. J., Raccio-Robak N. A comparison of proparacaine and tetracaine eye anesthetics. Acad Emerg Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;1(4):364–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christoph R. A., Buchanan L., Begalla K., Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117–120. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott J., Huskisson E. C. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]