Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1998 Jun;82(6):611–616. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.6.611

Do patients with age related maculopathy and cataract benefit from cataract surgery?

G Shuttleworth 1, E Luhishi 1, R Harrad 1
PMCID: PMC1722624  PMID: 9797659

Abstract

AIMS—To assess the benefits of cataract extraction in patients with age related maculopathy (ARM).
METHODS—1073 randomly selected cataract operations were reviewed and 99 cases of preoperatively recognised ARM were identified for investigation. Data relating to visual function were retrieved from case notes, and patient responses to a questionnaire were analysed.
RESULTS—98% had dry or unspecified ARM. Only 2% had exudative maculopathy. 81% of cases had an improvement in best distance acuity; mean change 0.44 logMAR (change of 6/36 to 6/12). 65% responded to the questionnaire; 67% felt that the operation had been worthwhile, 17% had mixed feelings, and 17% thought it not worthwhile.
CONCLUSION—This study, which is the first of its kind to be reported, shows a clear benefit from cataract surgery in the majority of patients with ARM. However, the prevalence of ARM in this study is lower than expected, suggesting that some patients with both ARM and cataract were not listed for surgery. The design of a prospective study to quantify the subjective and objective benefits of cataract surgery in these patients is outlined and predictors of successful outcome identified. This will promote the development of guidelines for the surgical management of this group of patients.

 Keywords: age related maculopathy; cataract; cataract surgery; outcome assessment; questionnaire

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.5 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Frequency table showing improvement in distance visual acuity. Shading in cells approximately proportional to cell frequency. The down sloping diagonal represents no change in visual acuity, cells below and to the left represent an improvement in visual acuity. CF= counting fingers; HM= hand movements. Missing data have been omitted (n=91). Where Snellen equivalent falls between common chart test sizes the nearest poorer acuity has been used.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alio J. L., Artola A., Ruiz-Moreno J. M., Ismail M. M., Ayala M. J. Accuracy of the potential acuity meter in predicting the visual outcome in cases of cataract associated with macular degeneration. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1993 Oct-Dec;3(4):189–192. doi: 10.1177/112067219300300403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett B. T., Davison P. A., Eustace P. Clinical comparison of three techniques for evaluating visual function behind cataract. Eye (Lond) 1995;9(Pt 6):722–727. doi: 10.1038/eye.1995.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blair C. J., Ferguson J., Jr Exacerbation of senile macular degeneration following cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Jan;87(1):77–83. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90195-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloom T. D., Fishman G. A., Traubert B. S. Laser interferometric visual acuity in senile macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983 Jun;101(6):925–926. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010925014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenner M. H., Curbow B., Javitt J. C., Legro M. W., Sommer A. Vision change and quality of life in the elderly. Response to cataract surgery and treatment of other chronic ocular conditions. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 May;111(5):680–685. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090050114040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cassard S. D., Patrick D. L., Damiano A. M., Legro M. W., Tielsch J. M., Diener-West M., Schein O. D., Javitt J. C., Bass E. B., Steinberg E. P. Reproducibility and responsiveness of the VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Dec;113(12):1508–1513. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100120038005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Claridge K. G., Francis P. J., Bates A. K. Should second eye cataract surgery be rationed? Eye (Lond) 1995;9(Pt 6 SU):47–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Courtney P. The National Cataract Surgery Survey: I. Method and descriptive features. Eye (Lond) 1992;6(Pt 5):487–492. doi: 10.1038/eye.1992.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Desai P. The National Cataract Surgery Survey: II. Clinical outcomes. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 4):489–494. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drolsum L., Davanger M., Haaskjold E. Cataract surgery. Computer-based registration and analysis of data. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993 Aug;71(4):477–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb04621.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elliott D. B., Hurst M. A., Weatherill J. Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 5):712–717. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elliott D. B., Sheridan M. The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti-cataract formulation trials. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8(4):397–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Elliott D. B., Yang K. C., Whitaker D. Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: seeing beyond 6/6. Optom Vis Sci. 1995 Mar;72(3):186–191. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199503000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans J., Wormald R. Is the incidence of registrable age-related macular degeneration increasing? Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;80(1):9–14. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Faulkner W. Laser interferometric prediction of postoperative visual acuity in patients with cataracts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 May;95(5):626–636. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(83)90381-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fish G. E., Birch D. G., Fuller D. G., Straach R. A comparison of visual function tests in eyes with maculopathy. Ophthalmology. 1986 Sep;93(9):1177–1182. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33598-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibson J. M., Rosenthal A. R., Lavery J. A study of the prevalence of eye disease in the elderly in an English community. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1985;104(Pt 2):196–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Halliday B. L., Ross J. E. Comparison of 2 interferometers for predicting visual acuity in patients with cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983 May;67(5):273–277. doi: 10.1136/bjo.67.5.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Javitt J. C., Brenner M. H., Curbow B., Legro M. W., Street D. A. Outcomes of cataract surgery. Improvement in visual acuity and subjective visual function after surgery in the first, second, and both eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 May;111(5):686–691. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090050120041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klein B. E., Klein R. Cataracts and macular degeneration in older Americans. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Apr;100(4):571–573. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030573002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Klein R., Klein B. E., Linton K. L. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992 Jun;99(6):933–943. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31871-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klein R., Wang Q., Klein B. E., Moss S. E., Meuer S. M. The relationship of age-related maculopathy, cataract, and glaucoma to visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Jan;36(1):182–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kraff M. C., Sanders D. R., Lieberman H. L. The results of posterior chamber lens implantation. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1983 Spring;9(2):148–150. doi: 10.1016/s0146-2776(83)80029-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lischwe T. D., Ide C. H. Predicting visual acuity after cataract surgery using the blue field entoptoscope and projected slides. Ophthalmology. 1988 Feb;95(2):256–260. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33210-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lovie-Kitchin J. E. Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8(4):363–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lumme P., Laatikainen L. T. Factors affecting the visual outcome after cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 1993;17(6):313–319. doi: 10.1007/BF00915736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lumme P., Laatikainen L. Sociodemographic aspects and systemic diseases of cataract patients. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1994 Feb;72(1):79–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02742.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Martinez G. S., Campbell A. J., Reinken J., Allan B. C. Prevalence of ocular disease in a population study of subjects 65 years old and older. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Aug;94(2):181–189. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90073-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Minkowski J. S., Palese M., Guyton D. L. Potential acuity meter using a minute aerial pinhole aperture. Ophthalmology. 1983 Nov;90(11):1360–1368. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34381-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moseley M. J., Jones H. S. Visual acuity: calculating appropriate averages. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993 Jun;71(3):296–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb07138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pollack A., Marcovich A., Bukelman A., Oliver M. Age-related macular degeneration after extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 1996 Oct;103(10):1546–1554. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30464-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Reeves B. C., Wood J. M., Hill A. R. Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993 Jan;13(1):17–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00421.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schein O. D., Steinberg E. P., Cassard S. D., Tielsch J. M., Javitt J. C., Sommer A. Predictors of outcome in patients who underwent cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1995 May;102(5):817–823. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30952-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Snyder A. W., Bossomaier T. R., Hughes A. Optical image quality and the cone mosaic. Science. 1986 Jan 31;231(4737):499–501. doi: 10.1126/science.3941914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Steinberg E. P., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P. D., Zuckerman A., Legro M. W., Anderson G. F., Bass E. B., O'Day D. The content and cost of cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Aug;111(8):1041–1049. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090080037016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Steinberg E. P., Tielsch J. M., Schein O. D., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P., Cassard S. D., Legro M. W., Diener-West M., Bass E. B., Damiano A. M. National study of cataract surgery outcomes. Variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jun;101(6):1131–1141. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31210-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Steinberg E. P., Tielsch J. M., Schein O. D., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P., Cassard S. D., Legro M. W., Diener-West M., Bass E. B., Damiano A. M. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 May;112(5):630–638. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170074026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vingerling J. R., Dielemans I., Hofman A., Grobbee D. E., Hijmering M., Kramer C. F., de Jong P. T. The prevalence of age-related maculopathy in the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1995 Feb;102(2):205–210. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31034-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wild J. M., Hussey M. K. Some statistical concepts in the analysis of vision and visual acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1985;5(1):63–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. van der Schaft T. L., Mooy C. M., de Bruijn W. C., Mulder P. G., Pameyer J. H., de Jong P. T. Increased prevalence of disciform macular degeneration after cataract extraction with implantation of an intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Jun;78(6):441–445. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.6.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES