Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1998 Jul;82(7):801–806. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.7.801

Visual outcome and prognostic factors after magnetic extraction of posterior segment foreign bodies in 40 cases

C Chiquet 1, J Zech 1, P Gain 1, P Adeleine 1, C Trepsat 1
PMCID: PMC1722693  PMID: 9924376

Abstract

AIMS—To evaluate the clinical features as well as the visual and anatomical outcome in eyes with magnetic posterior segment foreign bodies, to identify prognostic factors after removal using an electromagnet.
METHODS—The records of 40 patients with posterior segment foreign bodies were retrospectively reviewed for 6 years (1989-94). Post-traumatic cataracts and secondary retinal detachments were treated using conventional surgical techniques. Pars plana vitrectomy was used only for late complications. The mean follow up was 30 months (6-71). Clinical factors were studied using univariate analysis.
RESULTS—The most common findings before treatment of these 40 eyes were lens wound, hyphaema, vitreous haemorrhage, and retinal impairment. The foreign body was in the vitreous (85%) or minimally embedded in the retina (15%). Initial visual acuity was worse or equal to 20/40 in 70% of the cases. Subsequent to surgical treatment, a cataract was reported in 60% of the patients. Postoperative complications included retinal detachment (15%) and phthysis (5%). The prognosis was worse in cases with intraocular foreign body of largest diameter ⩾3 mm, an initial visual acuity less than 20/200, or the presence of post-traumatic retinal detachment. Presence of initial intravitreous haemorrhage, hyphaema, or intraocular tissue prolapse did not appear to affect the prognosis.
CONCLUSION—The long term visual acuity results indicated that wound repair associated with conventional magnet extraction in an emergency is a viable treatment for posterior segment magnetic foreign bodies in this selected group. At the time of diagnosis, size of foreign body (<3 mm) and initial visual acuity ⩾20/200 were predictors of good visual outcome after primary magnetic extraction.

 Keywords: intraocular foreign body; penetrating ocular injury; pars plana magnetic extraction

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (109.4 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Preoperative visual acuity plotted against postoperative visual acuity (VA) for 37 eyes. The point above the diagonal line represents an improvement in VA.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahmadieh H., Soheilian M., Sajjadi H., Azarmina M., Abrishami M. Vitrectomy in ocular trauma. Factors influencing final visual outcome. Retina. 1993;13(2):107–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arciniegas A., Araya R. Our experience in intraocular foreign-body removal. Ann Ophthalmol. 1992 Dec;24(12):453–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behrens-Baumann W., Praetorius G. Intraocular foreign bodies. 297 consecutive cases. Ophthalmologica. 1989;198(2):84–88. doi: 10.1159/000309963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brinton G. S., Aaberg T. M., Reeser F. H., Topping T. M., Abrams G. W. Surgical results in ocular trauma involving the posterior segment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Mar;93(3):271–278. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90524-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Camacho H., Mejía L. F. Extraction of intraocular foreign bodies by pars plana vitrectomy. A retrospective study. Ophthalmologica. 1991;202(4):173–179. doi: 10.1159/000310189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cleary P. E., Ryan S. J. Experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rabbit. II. Histology of wound, vitreous, and retina. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 May;63(5):312–321. doi: 10.1136/bjo.63.5.312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cleary P. E., Ryan S. J. Method of production and natural history of experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Aug;88(2):212–220. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90468-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coleman D. J., Lucas B. C., Rondeau M. J., Chang S. Management of intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1987 Dec;94(12):1647–1653. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33239-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coles W. H., Haik G. M. Vitrectomy in intraocular trauma. Its rationale and its indications and limitations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972 Jun;87(6):621–628. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1972.01000020623002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Juan E., Jr, Sternberg P., Jr, Michels R. G. Penetrating ocular injuries. Types of injuries and visual results. Ophthalmology. 1983 Nov;90(11):1318–1322. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34387-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eagling E. M. Perforating injuries involving the posterior segment. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1975 Jul;95(2):335–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Esmaeli B., Elner S. G., Schork M. A., Elner V. M. Visual outcome and ocular survival after penetrating trauma. A clinicopathologic study. Ophthalmology. 1995 Mar;102(3):393–400. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31009-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Faulborn J., Atkinson A., Olivier D. Primary vitrectomy as a preventive surgical procedure in the treatment of severely injured eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Mar;61(3):202–208. doi: 10.1136/bjo.61.3.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilbert C. M., Soong H. K., Hirst L. W. A two-year prospective study of penetrating ocular trauma at the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute. Ann Ophthalmol. 1987 Mar;19(3):104–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gregor Z., Ryan S. J. Complete and core vitrectomies in the treatment of experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. I. Clinical features. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983 Mar;101(3):441–445. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010441021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gregor Z., Ryan S. J. Complete and core vitrectomies in the treatment of experimental posterior penetrating eye injury in the rhesus monkey. II. Histologic features. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983 Mar;101(3):446–450. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010446022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hadden O. B., Wilson J. L. The management of intraocular foreign bodies. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1990 Aug;18(3):343–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1990.tb00631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heimann K., Paulmann H., Tavakolian U. The intraocular foreign body. Principles and problems in the management of complicated cases by pars plana vitrectomy. Int Ophthalmol. 1983 Jun;6(3):235–242. doi: 10.1007/BF00141133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Howcroft M. J., Shea M. Management of posterior-segment foreign bodies. Can J Ophthalmol. 1982 Dec;17(6):256–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hutton W. L., Fuller D. G. Factors influencing final visual results in severely injured eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Jun;97(6):715–722. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90503-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Irvine A. R. Old and new techniques combined in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Ann Ophthalmol. 1981 Jan;13(1):41–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnston S. Perforating eye injuries: a five year survey. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1971;91:895–921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Karel I., Diblík P. Management of posterior segment foreign bodies and long-term results. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1995 Apr-Jun;5(2):113–118. doi: 10.1177/112067219500500208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kazokoğlu H., Saatçi O. Intraocular foreign bodies: results of 27 cases. Ann Ophthalmol. 1990 Oct;22(10):373–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maguire A. M., Enger C., Eliott D., Zinreich S. J. Computerized tomography in the evaluation of penetrating ocular injuries. Retina. 1991;11(4):405–411. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199111040-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Michels R. G. Vitrectomy methods in penetrating ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1980 Jul;87(7):629–645. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35190-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. O'Neill E., Eagling E. M. Intraocular foreign bodies. Indications for lensectomy and vitrectomy. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1978 Apr;98(1):47–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Percival S. P. A decade of intraocular foreign bodies. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972 Jun;56(6):454–461. doi: 10.1136/bjo.56.6.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Percival S. P. Late complications from posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies with particular reference to retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972 Jun;56(6):462–468. doi: 10.1136/bjo.56.6.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Punnonen E., Laatikainen L. Prognosis of perforating eye injuries with intraocular foreign bodies. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1989 Oct;67(5):483–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb04097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. ROPER-HALL M. J. Review of 555 cases of intra-ocular foreign body with special reference to prognosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1954 Feb;38(2):65–99. doi: 10.1136/bjo.38.2.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rubsamen P. E., Cousins S. W., Winward K. E., Byrne S. F. Diagnostic ultrasound and pars plana vitrectomy in penetrating ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1994 May;101(5):809–814. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31254-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ryan S. J., Allen A. W. Pars plana vitrectomy in ocular trauma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Sep;88(3 Pt 1):483–491. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90651-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shock J. P., Adams D. Long-term visual acuity results after penetrating and perforating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Nov 15;100(5):714–718. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(85)90628-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sternberg P., Jr, de Juan E., Jr, Michels R. G., Auer C. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Oct 15;98(4):467–472. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams D. F., Mieler W. F., Abrams G. W., Lewis H. Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1988 Jul;95(7):911–916. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33069-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Winthrop S. R., Cleary P. E., Minckler D. S., Ryan S. J. Penetrating eye injuries: a histopathological review. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980 Nov;64(11):809–817. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.11.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. de Juan E., Jr, Sternberg P., Jr, Michels R. G., Auer C. Evaluation of vitrectomy in penetrating ocular trauma. A case-control study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug;102(8):1160–1163. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030938018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES