Abstract
BACKGROUND—Why some individuals present to the ophthalmologist in the early stages of chronic glaucoma but others present with very advanced visual field loss is a question which has received little attention. This study is an attempt to identify some basic characteristics of people who present with late glaucoma. METHODS—A retrospective case-control study by medical record review was employed. 100 cases and 100 controls were identified from the notes of patients presenting to Moorfields Eye Hospital glaucoma service between July 1993 and July 1995. Cases were defined as new patients presenting with absolute field loss within five degrees of fixation and a cup to disc ratio of greater than 0.8 in one or both eyes. Controls were new patients with no absolute field loss within 20 degrees in either eye, but otherwise typical glaucomatous field loss and a cup to disc ratio of greater than 0.5 or a difference of 0.2 or more between the discs. RESULTS—The ethnic origin, sex, referral source, presenting IOP, and age of the subjects studied were independently associated with late presentation. An African Caribbean patient is estimated to be four and a half times more likely to attend with advanced field loss than a white patient of similar age, sex, IOP, and referral source (adj OR: 4.55, 95% CI [1.57, 13.18]). A female patient is estimated to be one third (0.34, [0.15, 0.74]) as likely to attend late than a male patient of the similar age, IOP, ethnic origin, and referral source. A patient referred via any source other than an optometrist with the correct diagnosis is estimated to be greater than four times (4.32 [1.89, 9.88]) more likely to be a late attender than a patient of the same sex, ethnicity, and similar age but referred with a diagnosis of glaucoma. There was a trend of increasing odds of late presentation with increasing age (adj OR per 10 years, baseline 40-49 years 1.68 [1.22, 2.20]). A patient whose presenting IOP is 21-25 mm Hg is estimated to be a quarter (0.24, [0.09, 0.64]) as likely to attend with advanced field loss than a patient of the same ethnic origin, sex, age, referral source, but with presenting IOP of greater than 31 mm Hg CONCLUSIONS—These data strongly suggest that certain subgroups of patients with glaucoma are likely to be at greater risk of presenting with advanced and irremediable field loss. Keywords: glaucoma; late presentation; blindness; African Caribbeans; optometrists
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Coffey M., Reidy A., Wormald R., Xian W. X., Wright L., Courtney P. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;77(1):17–21. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grant W. M., Burke J. F., Jr Why do some people go blind from glaucoma? Ophthalmology. 1982 Sep;89(9):991–998. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34675-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grey R. H., Burns-Cox C. J., Hughes A. Blind and partial sight registration in Avon. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;73(2):88–94. doi: 10.1136/bjo.73.2.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jay J. L., Murdoch J. R. The rate of visual field loss in untreated primary open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Mar;77(3):176–178. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.3.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leske M. C., Rosenthal J. Epidemiologic aspects of open-angle glaucoma. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Mar;109(3):250–272. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mason R. P., Kosoko O., Wilson M. R., Martone J. F., Cowan C. L., Jr, Gear J. C., Ross-Degnan D. National survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St. Lucia, West Indies. Part I. Prevalence findings. Ophthalmology. 1989 Sep;96(9):1363–1368. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32708-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikelberg F. S., Schulzer M., Drance S. M., Lau W. The rate of progression of scotomas in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Jan 15;101(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90457-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller S. J., Karseras A. G. Blind registration and glaucoma simplex. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Apr;58(4):455–461. doi: 10.1136/bjo.58.4.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldrick J. H., Ng C., Austin D. J., Rosenthal A. R. An analysis of referral routes and diagnostic accuracy in cases of suspected glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1994 Mar;1(1):31–39. doi: 10.3109/09286589409071443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vernon S. How to screen for glaucoma. Practitioner. 1995 Apr;239(1549):257–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson R., Walker A. M., Dueker D. K., Crick R. P. Risk factors for rate of progression of glaucomatous visual field loss: a computer-based analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 May;100(5):737–741. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030741002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]