Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 Jan;83(1):62–65. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.1.62

The need for cataract surgery: projections based on lens opacity, visual acuity, and personal concern

C McCarty 1, J Keeffe 1, H Taylor 1
PMCID: PMC1722775  PMID: 10209437

Abstract

AIM—To assess the projected needs for cataract surgery by lens opacity, visual acuity, and patient concern.
METHODS—Data were collected as part of the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project, a population based study of age related eye disease in a representative sample of Melbourne residents aged 40 and over. Participants were recruited by a household census and invited to attend a local screening centre. At the study sites, the following data were collected: presenting and best corrected visual acuity, visual fields, intraocular pressure, satisfaction with current vision, personal health history and habits, and a standardised eye examination and photography of the lens and fundus. Lens photographs were graded twice and adjudicated to document lens opacities. Cataract was defined as nuclear greater than or equal to standard 2, 4/16 or greater cortical opacity, or any posterior subcapsular opacities.
RESULTS—3271 (83% response) people living in their own homes were examined. The participants ranged in age from 40 to 98 years and 1511 (46.2%) were men. Previous cataract surgery had been performed in 107 (3.4%) of the participants. The overall prevalence of any type of cataract that had not been surgically corrected was 18%. If the presence of cataract as defined was considered the sole criterion for cataract surgery with no reference to visual acuity, there would be 309 cataract operations per 1000 people aged 40 and over (96 eyes of people who were not satisfied with their vision, 210 eyes of people who were satisfied with their vision, and three previous cataract operations). At a visual acuity criterion of less than 6/12 (the vision required to legally drive a car), 48 cataract operations per 1000 would occur and people would be twice as likely to report dissatisfaction with their vision.
CONCLUSIONS—Estimates of the need for cataract surgery vary dramatically by level of lens opacity, visual acuity, and patient concern. These data should be useful for the planning of health services.

 Keywords: cataract surgery; visual acuity; patient satisfaction

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (113.6 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Cumulative number of cataract (defined as nuclear opacity ⩾ photo standard 2, ⩾ 4/16 cortical opacity or any posterior subcapsular opacities (PSC) operations required per 1000 population aged 40+ by level of best corrected visual acuity and patient satisfaction with vision.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brenner M. H., Curbow B., Javitt J. C., Legro M. W., Sommer A. Vision change and quality of life in the elderly. Response to cataract surgery and treatment of other chronic ocular conditions. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 May;111(5):680–685. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090050114040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Curbow B., Legro M. W., Brenner M. H. The influence of patient-related variables in the timing of cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 May 15;115(5):614–622. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71459-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Desai P. The National Cataract Surgery Survey: III. Process features. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 5):667–671. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Elam J. T., Graney M. J., Applegate W. B., Miller S. T., Freeman J. M., Wood T. O., Gettlefinger T. C. Functional outcome one year following cataract surgery in elderly persons. J Gerontol. 1988 Sep;43(5):M122–M126. doi: 10.1093/geronj/43.5.m122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Escarce J. J. Would eliminating differences in physician practice style reduce geographic variations in cataract surgery rates? Med Care. 1993 Dec;31(12):1106–1118. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199312000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Javitt J. C., Brenner M. H., Curbow B., Legro M. W., Street D. A. Outcomes of cataract surgery. Improvement in visual acuity and subjective visual function after surgery in the first, second, and both eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 May;111(5):686–691. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090050120041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Javitt J. C., Steinberg E. P., Sharkey P., Schein O. D., Tielsch J. M., Diener M., Legro M., Sommer A. Cataract surgery in one eye or both. A billion dollar per year issue. Ophthalmology. 1995 Nov;102(11):1583–1593. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30824-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keeffe J. E., Taylor H. R. Cataract surgery in Australia 1985-94. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1996 Nov;24(4):313–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1996.tb01601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Livingston P. M., Carson C. A., Stanislavsky Y. L., Lee S. E., Guest C. S., Taylor H. R. Methods for a population-based study of eye disease: the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;1(3):139–148. doi: 10.3109/09286589409047222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Livingston P. M., Lee S. E., McCarty C. A., Taylor H. R. A comparison of participants with non-participants in a population-based epidemiologic study: the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;4(2):73–81. doi: 10.3109/09286589709057099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mangione C. M., Phillips R. S., Lawrence M. G., Seddon J. M., Orav E. J., Goldman L. Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Nov;112(11):1419–1425. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090230033017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mordue A., Parkin D. W., Baxter C., Fawcett G., Stewart M. Thresholds for treatment in cataract surgery. J Public Health Med. 1994 Dec;16(4):393–398. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schein O. D., Steinberg E. P., Cassard S. D., Tielsch J. M., Javitt J. C., Sommer A. Predictors of outcome in patients who underwent cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1995 May;102(5):817–823. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30952-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sletteberg O., Høvding G., Bertelsen T. Do we operate too many cataracts? The referred cataract patients' own appraisal of their need for surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995 Feb;73(1):77–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Steinberg E. P., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P. D., Zuckerman A., Legro M. W., Anderson G. F., Bass E. B., O'Day D. The content and cost of cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Aug;111(8):1041–1049. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090080037016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Steinberg E. P., Tielsch J. M., Schein O. D., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P., Cassard S. D., Legro M. W., Diener-West M., Bass E. B., Damiano A. M. National study of cataract surgery outcomes. Variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jun;101(6):1131–1141. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31210-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Steinberg E. P., Tielsch J. M., Schein O. D., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P., Cassard S. D., Legro M. W., Diener-West M., Bass E. B., Damiano A. M. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 May;112(5):630–638. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170074026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor H. R., Livingston P. M., Stanislavsky Y. L., McCarty C. A. Visual impairment in Australia: distance visual acuity, near vision, and visual field findings of the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Mar;123(3):328–337. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70128-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES