Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 Feb;83(2):185–189. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.2.185

Confocal microscopy in cornea guttata and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy

A Chiou 1, S Kaufman 1, R Beuerman 1, T Ohta 1, H Soliman 1, H Kaufman 1
PMCID: PMC1722942  PMID: 10396196

Abstract

AIMS—To report the appearances of cornea guttata and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy from white light confocal microscopy.
METHODS—Seven eyes of four consecutive patients with cornea guttata were prospectively examined. Of the seven eyes, three also had corneal oedema (Fuchs' dystrophy). In vivo white light tandem scanning confocal microscopy was performed in all eyes. Results were compared with non-contact specular microscopy.
RESULTS—Specular microscopy was precluded by corneal oedema in one eye. In the remaining six eyes, it demonstrated typical changes including pleomorphism, polymegathism, and the presence of guttae appearing as dark bodies, some with a central bright reflex. In all seven eyes, confocal microscopy revealed the presence of round hyporeflective images with an occasional central highlight at the level of the endothelium. Changes in cell morphology and size were readily appreciated.
CONCLUSION—By comparison with specular microscopy, the hyporeflective images with an occasional central highlight seen on confocal microscopy are consistent with the presence of guttae. Confocal microscopy may confirm the diagnosis of cornea guttata and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy by demonstrating the presence of guttae. This technique is especially valuable in cases of corneal oedema, where specular microscopy may fail to visualise the endothelium. However, specular microscopy should remain the method of choice to evaluate the endothelium, principally because it is easier to use. 

 Keywords: confocal microscopy; cornea guttata; Fuchs' dystrophy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (155.5 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Patient 1. Specular microscopy in a case of cornea guttata with asymmetric presentation. Dark round bodies are more predominant in the right eye (OD). OS indicates left eye.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Patient 1. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the left eye. A few hyporeflective images with an occasional central highlight were seen at the level of the endothelium.

Figure 3  .

Figure 3  

Open in a new tab

Patient 1. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the right eye. Compared with the left eye, significantly more hyporeflective images were seen. Hyperreflective endothelial cells were found between the lesions.   

Figure 4  .

Figure 4  

Open in a new tab

Patient 2. Specular microscopy in the right (OD) and left (OS) eyes in a case of bilateral corneal guttae and oedema (Fuchs' dystrophy).

Figure 5  .

Figure 5  

Open in a new tab

Patient 2. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the right eye. Hyporeflective images with a central highlight were seen in the endothelium.

Figure 6  .

Figure 6  

Open in a new tab

Patient 2. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the left eye. Confluent hyporeflective images with a sporadic central highlight were demonstrated.

Figure 7  .

Figure 7  

Open in a new tab

Patient 3. Specular microscopy in a case of bilateral cornea guttata. OD indicates right eye and OS indicates left eye.

Figure 8  .

Figure 8  

Open in a new tab

Patient 3. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the right eye. Hyporeflective images were seen in the endothelium.

Figure 9  .

Figure 9  

Open in a new tab

Patient 3. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the left eye. Hyporeflective images with a central highlight were demonstrated in the endothelium.

Figure 10  .

Figure 10  

Open in a new tab

Patient 4. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) revealed the presence of confluent hyporeflective images in the endothelium. Hyperreflective endothelial cells were found between the lesions. The hyperreflective image on the upper part of the photograph is compatible with fibrous changes. Specular microscopy in this case of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy was prevented by corneal oedema.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beuerman R. W. Confocal microscopy: into the clinic. Cornea. 1995 Jan;14(1):1–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bigar F., Schimmelpfennig B., Hürzeler R. Cornea guttata in donor material. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Apr;96(4):653–655. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910050349010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brooks A. M., Grant G. B., Gillies W. E. The identification of corneal guttae. Cornea. 1991 May;10(3):249–260. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199105000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavanagh H. D., McCulley J. P. In vivo confocal microscopy and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Feb;121(2):207–208. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70586-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavanagh H. D., Petroll W. M., Alizadeh H., He Y. G., McCulley J. P., Jester J. V. Clinical and diagnostic use of in vivo confocal microscopy in patients with corneal disease. Ophthalmology. 1993 Oct;100(10):1444–1454. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31457-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chew S. J., Beuerman R. W., Assouline M., Kaufman H. E., Barron B. A., Hill J. M. Early diagnosis of infectious keratitis with in vivo real time confocal microscopy. CLAO J. 1992 Jul;18(3):197–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiou A. G., Cadez R., Böhnke M. Diagnosis of Dieffenbachia induced corneal injury by confocal microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Feb;81(2):168–169. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.2.168a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cibis G. W., Krachmer J. A., Phelps C. D., Weingeist T. A. The clinical spectrum of posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977 Sep;95(9):1529–1537. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1977.04450090051002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Florakis G. J., Moazami G., Schubert H., Koester C. J., Auran J. D. Scanning slit confocal microscopy of fungal keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;115(11):1461–1463. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160631019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaufman S. C., Beuerman R. W., Goldberg D. A new form of primary, localized, corneal amyloidosis: a case report with confocal microscopy. Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol (1985) 1995;18(1-4):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaufman S. C., Beuerman R. W., Kaufman H. E. Diagnosis of advanced Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy with the confocal microscope. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Nov 15;116(5):652–653. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73217-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaufman S. C., Chew S. J., Capps S. C., Beuerman R. W. Confocal microscopy of corneal penetration by tarantula hairs. Scanning. 1994 Sep-Oct;16(5):312–315. doi: 10.1002/sca.4950160511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krachmer J. H., Schnitzer J. I., Fratkin J. Cornea pseudoguttata: a clinical and histopathologic description of endothelial cell edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 Aug;99(8):1377–1381. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930020251007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Laing R. A., Leibowitz H. M., Oak S. S., Chang R., Berrospi A. R., Theodore J. Endothelial mosaic in Fuchs' dystrophy. A qualitative evaluation with the specular microscope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 Jan;99(1):80–83. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010082007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pfister D. R., Cameron J. D., Krachmer J. H., Holland E. J. Confocal microscopy findings of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Feb;121(2):119–128. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70576-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pouliquen Y., Dhermy P., Renard G., Giraud J. P., Savoldelli M. Combined macular dystrophy and cornea guttata: an electron microscopic study. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1980;212(3-4):149–158. doi: 10.1007/BF00410511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shah G. K., Pfister D., Probst L. E., Ferrieri P., Holland E. Diagnosis of microsporidial keratitis by confocal microscopy and the chromatrope stain. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;121(1):89–91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70538-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sutphin J. E., Kantor A. L., Mathers W. D., Mehaffey M. G. Evaluation of infectious crystalline keratitis with confocal microscopy in a case series. Cornea. 1997 Jan;16(1):21–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Waring G. O., 3rd, Rodrigues M. M., Laibson P. R. Corneal dystrophies. II. Endothelial dystrophies. Surv Ophthalmol. 1978 Nov-Dec;23(3):147–168. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(78)90151-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Waring G. O., Font R. L., Rodrigues M. M., Mulberger R. D. Alterations of Descemet's membrane in interstitial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976 Jun;81(6):773–785. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90361-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES