Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 Mar;83(3):290–294. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.3.290

Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma

D Kamal 1, A Viswanathan 1, D Garway-Heath 1, R Hitchings 1, D Poinoosawmy 1, C Bunce 1
PMCID: PMC1722960  PMID: 10365035

Abstract

AIM—To determine whether analysis of sequential optic disc images obtained with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) is able to demonstrate optic disc change before the development of reproducible field defects in a group of ocular hypertensive (OHT) patients converting to early glaucoma.
METHODS—Two groups were analysed: (1) 13 eyes of 13 OHT patients who subsequently developed reproducible field defects (converters); and (2) 13 eyes of 11 normal control subjects. Two sequential optic disc images were obtained using the HRT (median separation between images was 12 months for the converters and 13 months for the normals). The second image in the converter group was obtained before confirmed visual field loss. The optic disc variables were analysed both globally and segmentally using HRT software version 1.11. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine if there were any significant differences between the variables of the two image sets.
RESULTS—Significant optic disc change was demonstrated in the group of converters: (1) global variables: the cup area increased by 9.7%, the C/D area ratio increased by 10.5%, and the rim area decreased by 6.9%; (2) segmental variables: the superonasal cup area increased by 11.0%, the superonasal C/D area ratio increased 11.7%, and the inferonasal cup volume increased by 28.4%.The temporal rim volume decreased by 15.6%, the inferotemporal rim volume decreased by 23.6%, and the rim area in the superonasal and superotemporal segments decreased by 6.6% and 6.9% respectively.
CONCLUSION—Analysis of sequential optic disc images on the HRT allowed the detection of glaucomatous change before confirmed visual field change in a group of OHT patients converting to early glaucoma.

 Keywords: optic disc; Heidelberg retina tomograph; visual field; ocular hypertension; glaucoma

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Airaksinen P. J., Drance S. M. Neuroretinal rim area and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Feb;103(2):203–204. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050020055018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armaly M. F. Optic cup in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol. 1970 Jun;9(6):425–429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armaly M. F. The correlation between appearance of the optic cup and visual function. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1969 Sep-Oct;73(5):898–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boeglin R. J., Caprioli J., Zulauf M. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Apr 15;113(4):396–400. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76161-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caprioli J. Correlation of visual function with optic nerve and nerve fiber layer structure in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;33 (Suppl):319–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caprioli J., Prum B., Zeyen T. Comparison of methods to evaluate the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer for glaucomatous change. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jun;121(6):659–667. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70632-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chauhan B. C., Drance S. M. The relationship between intraocular pressure and visual field progression in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992;230(6):521–526. doi: 10.1007/BF00181772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chauhan B. C., LeBlanc R. P., McCormick T. A., Rogers J. B. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994 Jul 15;118(1):9–15. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72836-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cioffi G. A., Robin A. L., Eastman R. D., Perell H. F., Sarfarazi F. A., Kelman S. E. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1993 Jan;100(1):57–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dreher A. W., Tso P. C., Weinreb R. N. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Feb 15;111(2):221–229. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72263-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hatch W. V., Flanagan J. G., Etchells E. E., Williams-Lyn D. E., Trope G. E. Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Oct;81(10):871–876. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.10.871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heijl A., Lindgren A., Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Aug 15;108(2):130–135. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iester M., Mikelberg F. S., Courtright P., Drance S. M. Correlation between the visual field indices and Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters. J Glaucoma. 1997 Apr;6(2):78–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jonas J. B., Gusek G. C., Naumann G. O. Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. I. Morphometric intrapapillary characteristics. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226(6):522–530. doi: 10.1007/BF02169199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katz J., Sommer A., Witt K. Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing. Ophthalmology. 1991 Jan;98(1):70–75. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32339-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mao L. K., Stewart W. C., Shields M. B. Correlation between intraocular pressure control and progressive glaucomatous damage in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jan 15;111(1):51–55. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76896-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Migdal C., Gregory W., Hitchings R. Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994 Oct;101(10):1651–1657. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31120-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Orgül S., Croffi G. A., Van Buskirk E. M. Variability of contour line alignment on sequential images with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997 Feb;235(2):82–86. doi: 10.1007/BF00941734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pederson J. E., Anderson D. R. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Mar;98(3):490–495. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020030486010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Quigley H. A., Addicks E. M., Green W. R. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Jan;100(1):135–146. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030137016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rohrschneider K., Burk R. O., Kruse F. E., Völcker H. E. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jun;101(6):1044–1049. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31220-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schulzer M. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994 Sep;101(9):1589–1595. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31133-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sommer A., Pollack I., Maumenee A. E. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979 Aug;97(8):1444–1448. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1979.01020020106002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tuulonen A., Airaksinen P. J. Initial glaucomatous optic disk and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Apr 15;111(4):485–490. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72385-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Uchida H., Brigatti L., Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Nov;37(12):2393–2401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yablonski M. E., Zimmerman T. J., Kass M. A., Becker B. Prognostic significance of optic disk cupping in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Apr;89(4):585–592. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(80)90071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zangwill L. M., van Horn S., de Souza Lima M., Sample P. A., Weinreb R. N. Optic nerve head topography in ocular hypertensive eyes using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct;122(4):520–525. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zangwill L., Shakiba S., Caprioli J., Weinreb R. N. Agreement between clinicians and a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope in estimating cup/disk ratios. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Apr;119(4):415–421. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71226-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zeyen T. G., Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;111(1):62–65. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090010066028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES