Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 Apr;83(4):396–398. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.4.396

Trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre: 1987 to 1996

F Ah-Fat 1, M Sharma 1, M Majid 1, J McGalliard 1, D Wong 1
PMCID: PMC1722995  PMID: 10434858

Abstract

AIM—To identify trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre from 1987 to 1996.
METHODS—A retrospective study of patients who had undergone vitreoretinal surgery at St Paul's Eye Unit over two 6 month periods in 1987 and 1996. Preoperative ocular status, surgery details, and outcome were collected. χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyse the data.
RESULTS—The two periods under study were July to December 1987 and January to June 1996. 110 operations performed during 1987 (96 patients) and 330 operations during 1996 (289 patients) were analysed. There was a fourfold rise in the number of tertiary referrals and a sevenfold rise in the number of operations performed for conditions other than rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Increasing indications for surgery included diabetic eye disease, macular hole, dropped nucleus, endophthalmitis, and subretinal neovascular membrane. There was a rise in the proportion of patients with RRD following cataract surgery (from 19.5% to 29.5%). For both primary repair and reoperation, vitrectomy with internal tamponade was more commonly used in 1996. The anatomical success rate for primary repair changed from 76.6% to 84.7% after one operation and from 89.1% to 94.3% following additional surgery.
CONCLUSIONS—This study points to a trend towards subspecialisation and tertiary referral in vitreoretinal surgery. Vitrectomy techniques are more commonly used for the primary repair of RRD and are applied to a wider spectrum of diseases.

 Keywords: vitreoretinal surgery; tertiary referral; subspecialisation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (96.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berger A. S., Kaplan H. J. Clinical experience with the surgical removal of subfoveal neovascular membranes. Short-term postoperative results. Ophthalmology. 1992 Jun;99(6):969–976. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31869-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gilliland G. D., Hutton W. L., Fuller D. G. Retained intravitreal lens fragments after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1992 Aug;99(8):1263–1269. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31814-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kelly N. E., Wendel R. T. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 May;109(5):654–659. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050068031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sullivan P. M., Luff A. J., Aylward G. W. Results of primary retinal reattachment surgery: a prospective audit. Eye (Lond) 1997;11(Pt 6):869–871. doi: 10.1038/eye.1997.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wong D., McGalliard J. Are we getting better at treating retinal detachment? Technology, referral pattern or primary care? Eye (Lond) 1997;11(Pt 6):763–764. doi: 10.1038/eye.1997.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. de Bustros S., Thompson J. T., Michels R. G., Rice T. A., Glaser B. M. Vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes causing macular pucker. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988 Sep;72(9):692–695. doi: 10.1136/bjo.72.9.692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES