Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 May;83(5):546–552. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.5.546

Patients' perception of visual impairment in glaucoma: a pilot study

P Nelson 1, P Aspinall 1, C O'Brien 1
PMCID: PMC1723044  PMID: 10216052

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS—There is a paucity of useful information on the level of visual disability suffered by glaucoma patients. The aims of this study were to determine and rank the frequency of self reported visual disability in daily tasks performed by glaucoma patients; to examine the interrelation between disabilities using factor analysis; to study the relation between perceived visual difficulty and a measure of the severity of visual field loss; to develop a glaucoma specific subgroup of questions; and examine the validity and reliability of this subgroup of questions.
METHODS—63 glaucoma patients completed a questionnaire containing 62 questions covering 10 broad aspects of daily life activities using a five point answer scale. Patients were classified into three groups as having mild, moderate, and severe field loss on the basis of the perimetric results. The relation between a measure of the severity of visual field loss and subjective visual disability in the three groups was examined.
RESULTS—Using factor analysis, the most frequently reported problems were grouped into the following four categories: outdoor mobility, glare and lighting conditions and activities demanding functional peripheral vision, household tasks, and personal care. These four factors accounted for 72% of the variability in the patients' questionnaire responses. With increasing severity of binocular visual field loss there was an increase in the number of self reported visual problems. A loss of confidence in performing some routine daily tasks tended to precede self reported specific visual disabilities. The factor "glare and lighting and activities demanding functional peripheral vision" was found to have a significant relation with a measure of visual field loss and was used to create a glaucoma specific subset of questions. Cronbach's α showed a high degree of reliability and internal consistency (α =0.96) in this glaucoma specific subset of questions. Furthermore, the validity of this new subset of questions was shown to be significant (r=0.037, p<0.05) for the correlation between a measure of the severity of binocular visual field loss and the mean score of the variables used in the glaucoma specific subgroup of questions.
CONCLUSIONS—Outcome measures and quality of life issues need to be addressed in glaucoma. This pilot study identified common problems encountered by patients which at the present time are not assessed in routine glaucoma care. It also identified a subgroup of questions that seems to be specific for glaucoma. Further research is required if a significant impact on the quality of life of glaucoma patients is to be achieved.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (133.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barber B. L., Strahlman E. R., Laibovitz R., Guess H. A., Reines S. A. Validation of a questionnaire for comparing the tolerability of ophthalmic medications. Ophthalmology. 1997 Feb;104(2):334–342. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30314-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergman B., Sjöstrand J. Vision and visual disability in the daily life of a representative population sample aged 82 years. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1992 Feb;70(1):33–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb02089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dengler-Harles M., Wild J. M., Cole M. D., O'Neill E. C., Crews S. J. The influence of forward light scatter on the visual field indices in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228(4):326–331. doi: 10.1007/BF00920056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diggory P., Franks W. A. Glaucoma therapy may take your breath away. Age Ageing. 1997 Mar;26(2):63–67. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.2.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glovinsky Y., Quigley H. A., Drum B., Bissett R. A., Jampel H. D. A whole-field scotopic retinal sensitivity test for the detection of early glaucoma damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Apr;110(4):486–490. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080160064031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gutierrez P., Wilson M. R., Johnson C., Gordon M., Cioffi G. A., Ritch R., Sherwood M., Meng K., Mangione C. M. Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Jun;115(6):777–784. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150779014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Häkkinen L. Vision in the elderly and its use in the social environment. Scand J Soc Med Suppl. 1984;35:5–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jette A. M., Branch L. G. Impairment and disability in the aged. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):59–65. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee P. P. Outcomes and endpoints in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1996 Aug;5(4):295–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindenmuth K. A., Skuta G. L., Rabbani R., Musch D. C. Effects of pupillary constriction on automated perimetry in normal eyes. Ophthalmology. 1989 Sep;96(9):1298–1301. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32723-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lundström M., Fregell G., Sjöblom A. Vision related daily life problems in patients waiting for a cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Aug;78(8):608–611. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.8.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mangione C. M., Phillips R. S., Seddon J. M., Lawrence M. G., Cook E. F., Dailey R., Goldman L. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992 Dec;30(12):1111–1126. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199212000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marx M. S., Werner P., Cohen-Mansfield J., Feldman R. The relationship between low vision and performance of activities of daily living in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Oct;40(10):1018–1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb04479.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Masket S. Relationship between postoperative pupil size and disability glare. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992 Sep;18(5):506–507. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80107-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mills R. P., Drance S. M. Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1986 Mar;93(3):371–378. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33732-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ochsner H., Zrenner E. Der "Blendvisus". II. Untersuchung der Sehschärfe blendungsempfindlicher Patienten bei steigender Testfeldleuchtdichte. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1992 Feb;200(2):110–117. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1045722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parrish R. K., 2nd, Gedde S. J., Scott I. U., Feuer W. J., Schiffman J. C., Mangione C. M., Montenegro-Piniella A. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;115(11):1447–1455. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160617016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Quigley H. A. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;80(5):389–393. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.5.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ross J. E., Bron A. J., Clarke D. D. Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984 Nov;68(11):821–827. doi: 10.1136/bjo.68.11.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rubin G. S., Roche K. B., Prasada-Rao P., Fried L. P. Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci. 1994 Dec;71(12):750–760. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199412000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sherwood M. B., Garcia-Siekavizza A., Meltzer M. I., Hebert A., Burns A. F., McGorray S. Glaucoma's impact on quality of life and its relation to clinical indicators. A pilot study. Ophthalmology. 1998 Mar;105(3):561–566. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)93043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Steinberg E. P., Tielsch J. M., Schein O. D., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P., Cassard S. D., Legro M. W., Diener-West M., Bass E. B., Damiano A. M. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 May;112(5):630–638. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170074026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thompson J. R., Gibson J. M., Jagger C. The association between visual impairment and mortality in elderly people. Age Ageing. 1989 Mar;18(2):83–88. doi: 10.1093/ageing/18.2.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Webster A. R., Luff A. J., Canning C. R., Elkington A. R. The effect of pilocarpine on the glaucomatous visual field. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Nov;77(11):721–725. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.11.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zimmerman T. J., Karunaratne N., Fechtner R. D. Glaucoma: outcomeology (part I) J Glaucoma. 1996 Jun;5(3):151–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. van den Berg T. J. Importance of pathological intraocular light scatter for visual disability. Doc Ophthalmol. 1986 Jan 15;61(3-4):327–333. doi: 10.1007/BF00142360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES