Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 May;83(5):567–572. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.5.567

Effect of aging on optic nerve appearance: a longitudinal study

F Moya 1, L Brigatti 1, J Caprioli 1
PMCID: PMC1723053  PMID: 10216056

Abstract

AIM—To determine whether aging causes detectable changes in the appearance of the optic disc.
METHODS—A retrospective longitudinal study was performed with quantitative and qualitative evaluations of digitised stereoscopic optic disc photographs of 224 eyes of 224 subjects. There were three groups: 100 normal subjects from the Framingham Eye Study, 68 glaucomatous patients followed longitudinally, and 56 normal subjects and glaucoma patients who had separate sets of disc photos taken on the same day. A disc was considered qualitatively worse if two of three experienced observers agreed that it was worse. Quantitative progression was defined as a >10% decrease in rim/disc area ratio measured with computer assisted planimetry.
RESULTS—With quantitative evaluation, normal eyes (mean follow up 13 years) and same day eyes displayed no statistically significant difference in change of rim/disc area ratios (p=0.095), nor in the number of discs that progressed—five of 100 (5%) v two of 56 (4%) respectively. Glaucomatous eyes (mean follow up 9 years) showed a quantitative loss of disc rim in 24 of 68 (35%), and differed significantly from the normal eyes both in the change of rim/disc area ratio (p<0.0005) and number of discs that progressed (p<0.0005). With qualitative evaluation, the number of progressive discs in the glaucomatous eyes (31%) differed significantly (p<0.0005) from the normal eyes (3%) and the same day eyes (0%).
CONCLUSIONS—Over a period of follow up appropriate for long term outcome studies in glaucoma, there was no quantitatively or qualitatively detectable neuroretinal rim loss in normal aging optic nerves with stereoscopic optic disc photographs.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Airaksinen P. J., Drance S. M., Schulzer M. Neuroretinal rim area in early glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Jan 15;99(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75856-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Airaksinen P. J., Tuulonen A., Alanko H. I. Rate and pattern of neuroretinal rim area decrease in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Feb;110(2):206–210. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080140062028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balazsi A. G., Rootman J., Drance S. M., Schulzer M., Douglas G. R. The effect of age on the nerve fiber population of the human optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Jun;97(6):760–766. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90509-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bengtsson B. The alteration and asymmetry of cup and disc diameters. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1980 Oct;58(5):726–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1980.tb06685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Britton R. J., Drance S. M., Schulzer M., Douglas G. R., Mawson D. K. The area of the neuroretinal rim of the optic nerve in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987 Apr 15;103(4):497–504. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)74271-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caprioli J. Clinical evaluation of the optic nerve in glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:589–641. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caprioli J., Prum B., Zeyen T. Comparison of methods to evaluate the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer for glaucomatous change. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jun;121(6):659–667. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70632-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpel E. F., Engstrom P. F. The normal cup-disk ratio. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981 May;91(5):588–597. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(81)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dolman C. L., McCormick A. Q., Drance S. M. Aging of the optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Nov;98(11):2053–2058. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040905024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dreher A. W., Tso P. C., Weinreb R. N. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Feb 15;111(2):221–229. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72263-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayreh S. S., Klugman M. R., Podhajsky P., Kolder H. E. Electroretinography in central retinal vein occlusion. Correlation of electroretinographic changes with pupillary abnormalities. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;227(6):549–561. doi: 10.1007/BF02169451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Healey P. R., Mitchell P., Smith W., Wang J. J. The influence of age and intraocular pressure on the optic cup in a normal population. J Glaucoma. 1997 Oct;6(5):274–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jonas J. B., Gusek G. C., Guggenmoos-Holzmann I., Naumann G. O. Correlations of the neuroretinal rim area with ocular and general parameters in normal eyes. Ophthalmic Res. 1988;20(5):298–303. doi: 10.1159/000266730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kee C., Koo H., Ji Y., Kim S. Effect of optic disc size or age on evaluation of optic disc variables. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Dec;81(12):1046–1049. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.12.1046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leibowitz H. M., Krueger D. E., Maunder L. R., Milton R. C., Kini M. M., Kahn H. A., Nickerson R. J., Pool J., Colton T. L., Ganley J. P. The Framingham Eye Study monograph: An ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980 May-Jun;24(Suppl):335–610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'Connor D. J., Zeyen T., Caprioli J. Comparisons of methods to detect glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Ophthalmology. 1993 Oct;100(10):1498–1503. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31450-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Odberg T., Riise D. Early diagnosis of glaucoma. The value of successive stereophotography of the optic disc. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1985 Jun;63(3):257–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1985.tb06801.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pederson J. E., Anderson D. R. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Mar;98(3):490–495. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020030486010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Repka M. X., Quigley H. A. The effect of age on normal human optic nerve fiber number and diameter. Ophthalmology. 1989 Jan;96(1):26–32. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32928-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schuman J. S., Hee M. R., Puliafito C. A., Wong C., Pedut-Kloizman T., Lin C. P., Hertzmark E., Izatt J. A., Swanson E. A., Fujimoto J. G. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 May;113(5):586–596. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100050054031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sommer A., Pollack I., Maumenee A. E. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979 Aug;97(8):1444–1448. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1979.01020020106002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tsai C. S., Ritch R., Shin D. H., Wan J. Y., Chi T. Age-related decline of disc rim area in visually normal subjects. Ophthalmology. 1992 Jan;99(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)32017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Varma R., Tielsch J. M., Quigley H. A., Hilton S. C., Katz J., Spaeth G. L., Sommer A. Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Aug;112(8):1068–1076. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090200074026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeyen T. G., Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;111(1):62–65. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090010066028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES