Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 Jun;83(6):707–712. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.6.707

The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures

P Spry 1, I Spencer 1, J Sparrow 1, T Peters 1, S Brookes 1, S Gray 1, I Baker 1, J Furber 1, D Easty 1
PMCID: PMC1723073  PMID: 10340981

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS—Primary open angle glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects make up a considerable proportion of outpatient ophthalmological attendances and require lifelong review. Community optometrists can be suitably trained for assessment of glaucoma. This randomised controlled trial aims to assess the ability of community optometrists in the monitoring of this group of patients.
METHODS—Measures of cup to disc ratio, visual field score, and intraocular pressure were taken by community optometrists, the hospital eye service and a research clinic reference "gold" standard in 405 stable glaucoma patients and ocular hypertensives. Agreement between and within the three centres was assessed using mean differences and intraclass correlation coefficients. Tolerance limits for a change in status at the level of individual pairs of measurements were also calculated.
RESULTS—Compared with a research clinic reference standard, measurements made by community optometrists and those made in the routine hospital eye service were similar. Mean measurement differences and variability were similar across all three groups compared for each of the test variables (IOP, cup to disc ratio, and visual field). Overall, the visual field was found to be the most reliable measurement and the cup to disc ratio the least.
CONCLUSIONS—Trained community optometrists are able to make reliable measurements of the factors important in the assessment of glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects. This clinical ability should allow those optometrists with appropriate training to play a role in the monitoring of suitable patients.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (111.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailey I. L., Bullimore M. A., Raasch T. W., Taylor H. R. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Feb;32(2):422–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coast J., Spencer I. C., Smith L., Spry P. G. Comparing costs of monitoring glaucoma patients: hospital ophthalmologists versus community optometrists. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Jan;2(1):19–25. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coffey M., Reidy A., Wormald R., Xian W. X., Wright L., Courtney P. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;77(1):17–21. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. David R., Livingston D. G., Luntz M. H. Ocular hypertension--a long-term follow-up of treated and untreated patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Nov;61(11):668–674. doi: 10.1136/bjo.61.11.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gray S. F., Spencer I. C., Spry P. G., Brookes S. T., Baker I. A., Peters T. J., Sparrow J. M., Easty D. L. The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study--validity of measurements and patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med. 1997 Dec;19(4):431–436. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henson D. B., Darling M. N. Detecting progressive visual field loss. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15(5):387–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Henson D. B., Spry P. G., Spencer I. C., Sparrow J. M. Variability in glaucomatous visual fields: implications for shared care schemes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998 Mar;18(2):120–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kitazawa Y., Horie T., Aoki S., Suzuki M., Nishioka K. Untreated ocular hypertension. A long-term prospective study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977 Jul;95(7):1180–1184. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1977.04450070078004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klein B. E., Klein R., Sponsel W. E., Franke T., Cantor L. B., Martone J., Menage M. J. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992 Oct;99(10):1499–1504. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31774-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leibowitz H. M., Krueger D. E., Maunder L. R., Milton R. C., Kini M. M., Kahn H. A., Nickerson R. J., Pool J., Colton T. L., Ganley J. P. The Framingham Eye Study monograph: An ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980 May-Jun;24(Suppl):335–610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Quigley H. A. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;80(5):389–393. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.5.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schulzer M. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994 Sep;101(9):1589–1595. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31133-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sommer A., Tielsch J. M., Katz J., Quigley H. A., Gottsch J. D., Javitt J., Singh K. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Aug;109(8):1090–1095. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080080050026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Spencer I. C., Coast J., Spry P. G., Smith L., Sparrow J. M. The cost of monitoring glaucoma patients by community optometrists. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15(5):383–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spencer I. C., Spry P. G., Gray S. F., Baker I. A., Menage M. J., Easty D. L., Sparrow J. M. The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: study design. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15(5):391–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tielsch J. M., Katz J., Quigley H. A., Miller N. R., Sommer A. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology. 1988 Mar;95(3):350–356. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES