Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 Jul;83(7):771–773. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.7.771

Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase negative staphylococci isolated in corneal/external infections

A Pinna 1, S Zanetti 1, M Sotgiu 1, L Sechi 1, G Fadda 1, F Carta 1
PMCID: PMC1723098  PMID: 10381660

Abstract

AIMS—To identify and determine antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolated from patients with chronic blepharitis, purulent conjunctivitis, and suppurative keratitis.
METHODS—A retrospective review of all culture positive cases of chronic blepharitis, purulent conjunctivitis, and suppurative keratitis between July 1995 and December 1996 was performed. Cases in which CoNS were the sole isolates were analysed. Species identification was performed by using a commercially available standardised biochemical test system. Antibiotic susceptibility to penicillin, gentamicin, tetracycline, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and teicoplanin was determined by agar disc diffusion (Kirby-Bauer method). Teicoplanin resistance was confirmed by agar dilution.
RESULTS—42 Staphylococcus epidermidis, four S warneri, three S capitis, two S hominis, one each of S xylosus, S simulans, S equorum, and S lugdunensis were identified. 37 CoNS were penicillin resistant, 12 gentamicin resistant, 28 tetracycline resistant, 18 erythromycin resistant, four ciprofloxacin resistant, and one teicoplanin resistant (MIC, 32 µg/ml). In total, 16 strains were resistant to three or more antibiotics.
CONCLUSION—Species of CoNS apart from S epidermidis may be isolated from patients with corneal and external infection. Antibiotic susceptibility of CoNS is unpredictable and multiresistant strains are common. As a result, antibiotic susceptibility testing should be performed in all cases of clinically significant ocular infections caused by CoNS.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (96.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer G. L., Climo M. W. Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Oct;38(10):2231–2237. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.10.2231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Degener J. E., Heck M. E., van Leeuwen W. J., Heemskerk C., Crielaard A., Joosten P., Caesar P. Nosocomial infection by Staphylococcus haemolyticus and typing methods for epidemiological study. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2260–2265. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2260-2265.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dougherty J. M., McCulley J. P. Comparative bacteriology of chronic blepharitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug;68(8):524–528. doi: 10.1136/bjo.68.8.524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hyndiuk R. A., Eiferman R. A., Caldwell D. R., Rosenwasser G. O., Santos C. I., Katz H. R., Badrinath S. S., Reddy M. K., Adenis J. P., Klauss V. Comparison of ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin in treating bacterial corneal ulcers. Ciprofloxacin Bacterial Keratitis Study Group. Ophthalmology. 1996 Nov;103(11):1854–1863. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30416-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ieven M., Verhoeven J., Pattyn S. R., Goossens H. Rapid and economical method for species identification of clinically significant coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1060–1063. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1060-1063.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kattan H. M., Flynn H. W., Jr, Pflugfelder S. C., Robertson C., Forster R. K. Nosocomial endophthalmitis survey. Current incidence of infection after intraocular surgery. Ophthalmology. 1991 Feb;98(2):227–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leibowitz H. M. Antibacterial effectiveness of ciprofloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Oct;112(4 Suppl):29S–33S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McCulley J. P., Dougherty J. M. Bacterial aspects of chronic blepharitis. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1986;105(Pt 3):314–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McCulley J. P., Dougherty J. M., Deneau D. G. Classification of chronic blepharitis. Ophthalmology. 1982 Oct;89(10):1173–1180. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34669-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Neu H. C. Microbiologic aspects of fluoroquinolones. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Oct;112(4 Suppl):15S–24S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Brien T. P., Maguire M. G., Fink N. E., Alfonso E., McDonnell P. Efficacy of ofloxacin vs cefazolin and tobramycin in the therapy for bacterial keratitis. Report from the Bacterial Keratitis Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Oct;113(10):1257–1265. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100100045026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Snyder M. E., Katz H. R. Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacterial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Sep 15;114(3):336–338. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71801-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Speaker M. G., Milch F. A., Shah M. K., Eisner W., Kreiswirth B. N. Role of external bacterial flora in the pathogenesis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5):639–650. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32239-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES