Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1999 Jul;83(7):792–795. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.7.792

Creation and testing of a practical visual function assessment for use in Africa: correlation with visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and near vision in Malawian adults

K van Dijk 1, S Lewallen 1, M Chirambo 1, J Gardiner 1, B Hoar 1, J Lindley 1, N Wade 1, P Courtright 1
PMCID: PMC1723105  PMID: 10381665

Abstract

AIM—To develop and test a practical visual function assessment for use in developing countries.
METHODS—Using focus group discussions and interviews with eyecare workers and low vision specialists in Malawi, 13 questions related to visual characteristics of activities of daily living were designed. Patients presenting to an eye clinic were recruited and interviewed. Visual acuity, near vision, and contrast sensitivity were measured. Analysis sought to determine the degree of correlation between the vision indices and visual function.
RESULTS—The visual function questionnaire was easy to administer. Visual function correlated with visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, near vision, and patient reported visual problem. People with a higher frequency of "not applicable" responses had lower visual function scores. Multivariate modelling revealed that visual acuity and number of questions felt to be applicable were independently associated with visual function. Reducing the questionnaire to nine questions did not affect the degree of correlation with any of the visual indices.
CONCLUSION—The authors' visual function assessment correlates well with different measures of visual acuity. People with reduced vision for a prolonged period may no longer consider doing certain tasks and the number of questions considered appropriate by an individual may be an additional measure of visual function. Assessment of visual function by health workers may be a valuable tool in improving surgical uptake by encouraging both health personnel and patients to recognise that they have difficulties undertaking activities of daily living as well as a measure of monitoring and evaluating cataract outcomes.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernth-Petersen P. Visual functioning in cataract patients. Methods of measuring and results. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1981 Apr;59(2):198–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1981.tb02979.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner M. H., Curbow B., Javitt J. C., Legro M. W., Sommer A. Vision change and quality of life in the elderly. Response to cataract surgery and treatment of other chronic ocular conditions. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 May;111(5):680–685. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090050114040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Courtright P., Poon C. I., Richards J. S., Chow D. L., Holland S. P. Visual function among corneal disease patients waiting for penetrating keratoplasty in British Columbia. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998 Mar;5(1):13–20. doi: 10.1076/opep.5.1.13.1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Desai P., Reidy A., Minassian D. C., Vafidis G., Bolger J. Gains from cataract surgery: visual function and quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct;80(10):868–873. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.10.868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellwein L. B., Fletcher A., Negrel A. D., Thulasiraj R. D. Quality of life assessment in blindness prevention interventions. Int Ophthalmol. 1994;18(5):263–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00917828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fletcher A. E., Ellwein L. B., Selvaraj S., Vijaykumar V., Rahmathullah R., Thulasiraj R. D. Measurements of vision function and quality of life in patients with cataracts in southern India. Report of instrument development. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Jun;115(6):767–774. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150769013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mangione C. M., Phillips R. S., Lawrence M. G., Seddon J. M., Orav E. J., Goldman L. Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Nov;112(11):1419–1425. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090230033017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mangione C. M., Phillips R. S., Seddon J. M., Lawrence M. G., Cook E. F., Dailey R., Goldman L. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992 Dec;30(12):1111–1126. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199212000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Steinberg E. P., Tielsch J. M., Schein O. D., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P., Cassard S. D., Legro M. W., Diener-West M., Bass E. B., Damiano A. M. National study of cataract surgery outcomes. Variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jun;101(6):1131–1141. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31210-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Steinberg E. P., Tielsch J. M., Schein O. D., Javitt J. C., Sharkey P., Cassard S. D., Legro M. W., Diener-West M., Bass E. B., Damiano A. M. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 May;112(5):630–638. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170074026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES