Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 2000 Dec;84(12):1380–1382. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.12.1380

Effect of age on visual outcome following cataract extraction

M Westcott 1, S Tuft 1, D Minassian 1
PMCID: PMC1723326  PMID: 11090477

Abstract

AIM—To determine the effect of age on final corrected visual acuity following cataract extraction.
METHODS—A case series of 880 patients aged 60 years and older undergoing cataract extraction between 1996 and 1999 was studied. The best corrected visual acuity was assessed at discharge from the service and the proportion of patients who achieved a postoperative acuity of ⩾6/12 was determined for different age groups. Analysis was also performed after exclusion of patients identified preoperatively as having ocular comorbidity that was thought to limit their final corrected acuity. The odds ratios for visual outcome were calculated for age using multiple logistic regression analysis to adjust for other prognostic factors.
RESULTS—A significant age effect was observed, with the proportion of patients who had no ocular comorbidity identified preoperatively and who achieved a visual acuity of ⩾6/12 at discharge decreasing with age (p<0.001). In patients with no comorbidity the odds of achieving an acuity of ⩾6/12 were 4.6 times higher in the 60-69 year age group than in the oldest age group (80+ years).
CONCLUSIONS—Age is a significant determinant of visual outcome. This has implications if a points system incorporating an assessment of visual acuity or if visual acuity alone is used to determine the threshold for eligibility for cataract surgery.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (93.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Crabtree H. L., Hildreth A. J., O'Connell J. E., Phelan P. S., Allen D., Gray C. S. Measuring visual symptoms in British cataract patients: the cataract symptom scale. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 May;83(5):519–523. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.5.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Desai P., Minassian D. C., Reidy A. National cataract surgery survey 1997-8: a report of the results of the clinical outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Dec;83(12):1336–1340. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.12.1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hadorn D. C., Holmes A. C. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview. BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):131–134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hart P. M., Chakravarthy U., Stevenson M. R. Questionnaire-based survey on the importance of quality of life measures in ophthalmic practice. Eye (Lond) 1998;12(Pt 1):124–126. doi: 10.1038/eye.1998.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McCarty C. A., Keeffe J. E., Taylor H. R. The need for cataract surgery: projections based on lens opacity, visual acuity, and personal concern. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;83(1):62–65. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCarty C. A., Mukesh B. N., Fu C. L., Taylor H. R. The epidemiology of cataract in Australia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Oct;128(4):446–465. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00218-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Minassian D. C., Reidy A., Desai P., Farrow S., Vafidis G., Minassian A. The deficit in cataract surgery in England and Wales and the escalating problem of visual impairment: epidemiological modelling of the population dynamics of cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan;84(1):4–8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.1.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Norregaard J. C., Hindsberger C., Alonso J., Bellan L., Bernth-Petersen P., Black C., Dunn E., Andersen T. F., Espallargues M., Anderson G. F. Visual outcomes of cataract surgery in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain. Report From the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Aug;116(8):1095–1100. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.8.1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nørregaard J. C., Bernth-Petersen P., Andersen T. F. Changing threshold for cataract surgery in Denmark between 1980 and 1992. Results from the Danish Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study. II. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996 Dec;74(6):604–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1996.tb00744.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reidy A., Minassian D. C., Vafidis G., Joseph J., Farrow S., Wu J., Desai P., Connolly A. Prevalence of serious eye disease and visual impairment in a north London population: population based, cross sectional study. BMJ. 1998 May 30;316(7145):1643–1646. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7145.1643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schein O. D., Steinberg E. P., Cassard S. D., Tielsch J. M., Javitt J. C., Sommer A. Predictors of outcome in patients who underwent cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1995 May;102(5):817–823. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30952-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Taylor H. R. Cataract: how much surgery do we have to do? Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan;84(1):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES