Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 2000 Mar;84(3):244–250. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.3.244

Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability?

M McClure 1, P Hart 1, A Jackson 1, M Stevenson 1, U Chakravarthy 1
PMCID: PMC1723404  PMID: 10684832

Abstract

AIMS—To examine the relation between measures of vision and ability to perform daily living tasks in those visually impaired with macular degeneration.
METHODS—A visual functioning index (daily living tasks dependent on vision: DLTV) was used to evaluate patients' perception of their ability to perform vision dependent tasks. Distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, reading speed, and contrast sensitivity were measured in all patients. In addition, a new measure of reading ability was derived, designated the reading index. This takes into account both the size of the text read and the time to read it and is equivalent to the reading speed in words per minute divided by text size in M.
RESULTS—The reading index was found to show best associations with the majority of items within the DLTV. Stepwise regression identified the combination of reading index and distance visual acuity as having the best associations with DLTV items. The present study also demonstrated that specific levels of vision as measured by acuity, reading index, and contrast sensitivity corresponded with different perceived amounts of difficulty in the performance of daily living tasks.
CONCLUSIONS—This study showed that reading index is valuable in predicting the ability to perform daily living tasks and therefore may be useful in the visual assessment of the visually impaired individual. In addition, this study identified specific levels of vision at which individuals reported different degrees of difficulty in performing daily living tasks.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.5 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Distribution of various factors in individuals tested in the better eye.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahn S. J., Legge G. E., Luebker A. Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed. Vision Res. 1995 Jul;35(13):1939–1944. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00294-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander M. F., Maguire M. G., Lietman T. M., Snyder J. R., Elman M. J., Fine S. L. Assessment of visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration and low visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Nov;106(11):1543–1547. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140711040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey I. L., Lovie J. E. The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980 Jun;57(6):378–387. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198006000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Battu V. K., Meyer D. R., Wobig J. L. Improvement in subjective visual function and quality of life outcome measures after blepharoptosis surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jun;121(6):677–686. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70634-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Desai P., Reidy A., Minassian D. C., Vafidis G., Bolger J. Gains from cataract surgery: visual function and quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct;80(10):868–873. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.10.868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elliott D. B., Hurst M. A., Weatherill J. Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 5):712–717. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellwein L. B., Fletcher A., Negrel A. D., Thulasiraj R. D. Quality of life assessment in blindness prevention interventions. Int Ophthalmol. 1994;18(5):263–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00917828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Klein R., Wang Q., Klein B. E., Moss S. E., Meuer S. M. The relationship of age-related maculopathy, cataract, and glaucoma to visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Jan;36(1):182–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kleiner R. C., Enger C., Alexander M. F., Fine S. L. Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Jan;106(1):55–57. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130061028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leat S. J., Woodhouse J. M. Reading performance with low vision aids: relationship with contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993 Jan;13(1):9–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lundström M., Fregell G., Sjöblom A. Vision related daily life problems in patients waiting for a cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Aug;78(8):608–611. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.8.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mangione C. M., Berry S., Spritzer K., Janz N. K., Klein R., Owsley C., Lee P. P. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Feb;116(2):227–233. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.2.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mangione C. M., Phillips R. S., Lawrence M. G., Seddon J. M., Orav E. J., Goldman L. Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Nov;112(11):1419–1425. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090230033017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Parrish R. K., 2nd Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;94:919–1028. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ross C. K., Stelmack J. A., Stelmack T. R., Fraim M. Preliminary examination of the reliability and relation to clinical state of a measure of low vision patient functional status. Optom Vis Sci. 1991 Dec;68(12):918–923. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199112000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rumney N. J. Using visual thresholds to establish low vision performance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Mar;15 (Suppl 1):S18–S24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scott I. U., Schein O. D., West S., Bandeen-Roche K., Enger C., Folstein M. F. Functional status and quality of life measurement among ophthalmic patients. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Mar;112(3):329–335. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090150059023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Swann P. G., Lovie-Kitchin J. E. Age-related maculopathy. I: A review of its morphology and effects on visual function. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990 Apr;10(2):149–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1990.tb00969.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Whittaker S. G., Lovie-Kitchin J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Jan;70(1):54–65. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199301000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu A. W., Coleson L. C., Holbrook J., Jabs D. A. Measuring visual function and quality of life in patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis. Development of a questionnaire. Studies of Ocular Complication of AIDS Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Jul;114(7):841–847. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140055008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES