Abstract
AIM—To study prospectively the outcome of conservative and surgical treatment of chalazia provided by medical and nursing staff. METHODS—During a 5 month recruitment period all patients attending a district general eye hospital for treatment of chalazion were included in the study. 129 patients (217 visits) with chalazia were seen by either a senior nurse or a trainee ophthalmologist (senior house officer, SHO) or both. Patients received either conservative treatment or eversion of the eyelid with incision and curettage. Patients were mailed a questionnaire asking them if their cyst had resolved and how they rated their treatment. Marginal cost analysis was used to determine the cost of treatment. RESULTS—The outcome of treatment could be determined in 170 of the 217 visits. Conservative treatment was successful for 29% of cysts while surgical treatment was successful for 72%. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome between nurse and SHO groups. Patients found nurse treatment acceptable with a high level of patient satisfaction. The marginal cost of treatment by a nurse was £9.91 per cyst compared with £12.10 for SHOs. There were no surgical complications and no evidence of malignancy in six biopsies. CONCLUSIONS—Surgical treatment of chalazion is safe and effective and successfully treats approximately three quarters of selected cysts. With conservative treatment approximately one third of selected chalazia will resolve within 3 months. Nurse treatment of chalazion is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bohigian G. M. Chalazion: a clinical evaluation. Ann Ophthalmol. 1979 Sep;11(9):1397–1398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cottrell D. G., Bosanquet R. C., Fawcett I. M. Chalazions: the frequency of spontaneous resolution. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Nov 26;287(6405):1595–1595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6405.1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Epstein G. A., Putterman A. M. Combined excision and drainage with intralesional corticosteroid injection in the treatment of chronic chalazia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Apr;106(4):514–516. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130560036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garrett G. W., Gillespie M. E., Mannix B. C. Adrenocorticosteroid injection vs. conservative therapy in the treatment of chalazia. Ann Ophthalmol. 1988 May;20(5):196–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs P. M., Thaller V. T., Wong D. Intralesional corticosteroid therapy of chalazia: a comparison with incision and curettage. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984 Nov;68(11):836–837. doi: 10.1136/bjo.68.11.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laing A. Minor surgery: an extended role for ophthalmic nurses in the United Kingdom. Insight. 1999 Jan-Mar;24(1):5–9. doi: 10.1016/s1060-135x(99)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonnell P. J. How do general practitioners manage eye disease in the community? Br J Ophthalmol. 1988 Oct;72(10):733–736. doi: 10.1136/bjo.72.10.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perry H. D., Serniuk R. A. Conservative treatment of chalazia. Ophthalmology. 1980 Mar;87(3):218–221. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35250-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prasad S., Gupta A. K. Subconjunctival total excision in the treatment of chronic chalazia. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1992 Oct-Dec;40(4):103–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]