Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 2000 Jul;84(7):718–721. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.7.718

Efficacy and safety of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in Chinese eyes with complicated glaucoma

J Lai 1, A Poon 1, J Chua 1, C Tham 1, A Leung 1, D Lam 1
PMCID: PMC1723554  PMID: 10873981

Abstract

AIMS—To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in Chinese eyes with complicated glaucomas.
METHODS—This retrospective study reviewed the final intraocular pressure, visual outcome, and incidence of complications in all patients with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant performed at the Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, between June 1996 and November 1998.
RESULTS—A total of 65 eyes from 60 patients were treated with the Ahmed glaucoma implant. At a mean follow up (SD, median) of 21.8 (9.2, 28.0) months (range 6-37 months), the mean intraocular pressure was reduced from 37.0 (SD 12.1) mm Hg before the implant surgery to 16.1 (12.4) mm Hg at the last follow up after surgery. The success rate of intraocular pressure control of <22 mm Hg was achieved in 73.8% of operated eyes. Transient postoperative hypotony with shallow anterior chamber occurred in 10.8% of cases. The most common postoperative complication was the formation of encapsulated bleb (24.6%).
CONCLUSIONS—The Ahmed glaucoma valve implant appears to be effective and relatively safe for treating complicated glaucomas in Chinese eyes. The success rate is comparable with those reported in non-Asian eyes. Formation of postoperative encapsulated bleb is, however, more commonly encountered.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (121.1 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Kaplan-Meier curve showing probability of survival with time.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Scattergram of the preoperative versus the final intraocular pressure (IOP). The line of equivalence is also shown.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aung T., Seah S. K. Glaucoma drainage implants in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology. 1998 Nov;105(11):2117–2122. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broadway D., Grierson I., Hitchings R. Racial differences in the results of glaucoma filtration surgery: are racial differences in the conjunctival cell profile important? Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Jun;78(6):466–475. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.6.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chihara E., Kubota H., Takanashi T., Nao-i N. Outcome of White pump shunt surgery for neovascular glaucoma in Asians. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992 Oct;23(10):666–671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christmann L. M., Wilson M. E. Motility disturbances after Molteno implants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1992 Jan-Feb;29(1):44–48. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19920101-09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coleman A. L., Hill R., Wilson M. R., Choplin N., Kotas-Neumann R., Tam M., Bacharach J., Panek W. C. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jul;120(1):23–31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73755-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Egbert P. R., Lieberman M. F. Internal suture occlusion of the Molteno glaucoma implant for the prevention of postoperative hypotony. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989 Jan;20(1):53–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Englert J. A., Freedman S. F., Cox T. A. The Ahmed valve in refractory pediatric glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;127(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00292-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldman R. M., el-Harazi S. M., Villanueva G. Valve membrane adhesion as a cause of Ahmed glaucoma valve failure. J Glaucoma. 1997 Feb;6(1):10–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fellenbaum P. S., Almeida A. R., Minckler D. S., Sidoti P. A., Baerveldt G., Heuer D. K. Krupin disk implantation for complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jul;101(7):1178–1182. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(13)31724-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang M. C., Netland P. A., Coleman A. L., Siegner S. W., Moster M. R., Hill R. A. Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;127(1):27–33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00394-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krupin T., Kaufman P., Mandell A. I., Terry S. A., Ritch R., Podos S. M., Becker B. Long-term results of valve implants in filtering surgery for eyes with neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 Jun;95(6):775–782. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(83)90064-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krupin T., Kaufman P., Mandell A., Ritch R., Asseff C., Podos S. M., Becker B. Filtering valve implant surgery for eyes wtih neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Mar;89(3):338–343. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(80)90002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lam D. S., Cheuk W., Lai J. S. Short-term results of using Lamellar Corneo-scleral patch graft for the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant surgery. Yan Ke Xue Bao. 1997 Sep;13(3):109–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lam D. S., Lai J. S., Chua J. K., Fan D. S. Needling revision of glaucoma drainage device filtering blebs. Ophthalmology. 1998 Jul;105(7):1127–1128. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)97004-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lavin M. J., Franks W. A., Wormald R. P., Hitchings R. A. Clinical risk factors for failure in glaucoma tube surgery. A comparison of three tube designs. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Apr;110(4):480–485. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080160058030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lim K. S., Allan B. D., Lloyd A. W., Muir A., Khaw P. T. Glaucoma drainage devices; past, present, and future. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Sep;82(9):1083–1089. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.9.1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lloyd M. A., Sedlak T., Heuer D. K., Minckler D. S., Baerveldt G., Lee M. B., Martone J. F. Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Update of a pilot study. Ophthalmology. 1992 May;99(5):679–687. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31910-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McDonnell P. J., Robin J. B., Schanzlin D. J., Minckler D., Baerveldt G., Smith R. E., Heuer D. Molteno implant for control of glaucoma in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1988 Mar;95(3):364–369. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33187-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Melamed S., Fiore P. M. Molteno implant surgery in refractory glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990 May-Jun;34(6):441–448. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(90)90124-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mills R. P., Reynolds A., Emond M. J., Barlow W. E., Leen M. M. Long-term survival of Molteno glaucoma drainage devices. Ophthalmology. 1996 Feb;103(2):299–305. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30700-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Minckler D. S., Heuer D. K., Hasty B., Baerveldt G., Cutting R. C., Barlow W. E. Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 1988 Sep;95(9):1181–1188. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33029-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Netland P. A., Walton D. S. Glaucoma drainage implants in pediatric patients. Ophthalmic Surg. 1993 Nov;24(11):723–729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Prata J. A., Jr, Mérmoud A., LaBree L., Minckler D. S. In vitro and in vivo flow characteristics of glaucoma drainage implants. Ophthalmology. 1995 Jun;102(6):894–904. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30937-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rojanapongpun P., Ritch R. Clear corneal graft overlying the seton tube to facilitate laser suture lysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Sep;122(3):424–425. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72070-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sidoti P. A., Minckler D. S., Baerveldt G., Lee P. P., Heuer D. K. Epithelial ingrowth and glaucoma drainage implants. Ophthalmology. 1994 May;101(5):872–875. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31245-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Siegner S. W., Netland P. A., Urban R. C., Jr, Williams A. S., Richards D. W., Latina M. A., Brandt J. D. Clinical experience with the Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Ophthalmology. 1995 Sep;102(9):1298–1307. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30871-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tan C., Chew P. T., Lum W. L., Chee C. Trabeculectomy--success rates in a Singapore hospital. Singapore Med J. 1996 Oct;37(5):505–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES