Abstract
AIM—To study the effects of supervised inpatient occlusion treatment for amblyopia in children who had failed to respond to outpatient treatment. METHODS—A retrospective study of 39 children admitted to a paediatric ophthalmic ward for 5 days of supervised intensive occlusion therapy having previously failed to respond to outpatient occlusion. Visual acuity of amblyopic and fellow eyes was recorded at each clinic visit before admission, daily during admission, and at each outpatient visit after discharge. RESULTS—There was no significant overall improvement in visual acuity during a mean of 9 months of attempted outpatient occlusion before admission. During the 5 days of admission 26 children (67%) gained at least one line of acuity in their amblyopic eye and five (13%) gained three or more lines (mean gain 1.03 Snellen lines). The acuities of both the amblyopic and fellow eyes subsequently improved with continuing part time patching as an outpatient, including in nine of the children who did not respond during admission. At the last recorded visit, at a median time of 14 months after discharge, 13 (33%) of the patients had an acuity of at least 6/12 in their amblyopic eye. CONCLUSIONS—The acuity of amblyopic eyes did not improve without effective treatment. Subsequent supervised inpatient occlusion therapy was effective in the majority of the children.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (93.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Epelbaum M., Milleret C., Buisseret P., Dufier J. L. The sensitive period for strabismic amblyopia in humans. Ophthalmology. 1993 Mar;100(3):323–327. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(13)32170-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fielder A. R., Irwin M., Auld R., Cocker K. D., Jones H. S., Moseley M. J. Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jun;79(6):585–589. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.6.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garzia R. P. Efficacy of vision therapy in amblyopia: a literature review. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987 Jun;64(6):393–404. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198706000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiscox F., Strong N., Thompson J. R., Minshull C., Woodruff G. Occlusion for amblyopia: a comprehensive survey of outcome. Eye (Lond) 1992;6(Pt 3):300–304. doi: 10.1038/eye.1992.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J., Adams G., Sloper J., McIntyre A. Future of preschool vision screening. Cost effectiveness of screening for amblyopia is a public health issue. BMJ. 1998 Mar 21;316(7135):937–938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lithander J., Sjöstrand J. Anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia in the age group 2 years and above: a prospective study of the results of treatment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991 Feb;75(2):111–116. doi: 10.1136/bjo.75.2.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moseley M. J. Graphical representation of visual acuity data. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997 Sep;17(5):441–442. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simons K., Preslan M. Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 May;83(5):582–587. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.5.582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodruff G., Hiscox F., Thompson J. R., Smith L. K. Factors affecting the outcome of children treated for amblyopia. Eye (Lond) 1994;8(Pt 6):627–631. doi: 10.1038/eye.1994.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]