Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 2001 May;85(5):604–609. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.5.604

The long term outcome of limbal allografts: the search for surviving cells

T Henderson 1, D Coster 1, K Williams 1
PMCID: PMC1723982  PMID: 11316725

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS—Limbal allotransplantation is increasingly being used for ocular surface repair in patients with limbal stem cell dysfunction. However, it is uncertain whether donor cells survive long term on the ocular surface and whether patients maintain the early benefits of the procedure. The aims of this study were to investigate the long term outcome of clinical limbal allografts and to correlate outcome with donor cell survival.
METHODS—Five patients who had undergone allotransplantation—four keratolimbal allografts and one tarsoconjunctival allograft—from 3-5 years previously, and for whom residual frozen donor ocular tissue was available, were reviewed. Survival of donor cells lifted from the recipient ocular surface by impression cytology was investigated by DNA fingerprinting using primers detecting variable nucleotide tandem repeat sequences. Recipient buccal cells and scleral samples from the remnant donor eye were used to genotype recipients and donors, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction products were sized by Genescan analysis.
RESULTS—An objective long term benefit from the procedure (improved Snellen acuity, reduced frequency of epithelial defects, reduced vascularisation, and scarring) was recorded for four patients. Some subjective benefit was also reported. However, in no instances were donor cells recovered from the ocular surface at 3-5 years post-graft. Initial experiments to examine sensitivity indicated that any surviving donor cells must have constituted less than 2.5% of cells sampled.
CONCLUSION—Limbal stem cell allotransplantation can provide long term benefits, as measured by objective criteria. However, such benefits do not necessarily correlate with survival of measurable numbers of donor cells on the ocular surface.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (364.7 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Clinical photographs of operated eyes showing the appearance immediately preceding surgery on the left hand side and the appearance of the same eye at the study review on the right hand side.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Series of DNA fingerprints obtained from ocular surface (cornea) and buccal samples in patient C and the fingerprints from stored donor material. The peaks for each primer are shown in a different colour and correspond to the values in Table 3.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Copeland R. A., Jr, Char D. H. Limbal autograft reconstruction after conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990 Oct 15;110(4):412–415. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coster D. J., Aggarwal R. K., Williams K. A. Surgical management of ocular surface disorders using conjunctival and stem cell allografts. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Nov;79(11):977–982. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.11.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dart J. Impression cytology of the ocular surface--research tool or routine clinical investigation? Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;81(11):930–930. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.11.930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Henderson T. R., McCall S. H., Taylor G. R., Noble B. A. Do transplanted corneal limbal stem cells survive in vivo long-term? Possible techniques to detect donor cell survival by polymerase chain reaction with the amelogenin gene and Y-specific probes. Eye (Lond) 1997;11(Pt 6):779–785. doi: 10.1038/eye.1997.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herman W. K., Doughman D. J., Lindstrom R. L. Conjunctival autograft transplantation for unilateral ocular surface diseases. Ophthalmology. 1983 Sep;90(9):1121–1126. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)80056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holland E. J., Schwartz G. S. The evolution of epithelial transplantation for severe ocular surface disease and a proposed classification system. Cornea. 1996 Nov;15(6):549–556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jeffreys A. J., Wilson V., Thein S. L. Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA. Nature. 1985 Jul 4;316(6023):76–79. doi: 10.1038/316076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkins C., Tuft S., Liu C., Buckley R. Limbal transplantation in the management of chronic contact-lens-associated epitheliopathy. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 5):629–633. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kenyon K. R., Tseng S. C. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1989 May;96(5):709–723. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32833-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kinoshita S., Kiorpes T. C., Friend J., Thoft R. A. Limbal epithelium in ocular surface wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982 Jul;23(1):73–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pfister R. R. Corneal stem cell disease: concepts, categorization, and treatment by auto- and homotransplantation of limbal stem cells. CLAO J. 1994 Jan;20(1):64–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shimazaki J., Kaido M., Shinozaki N., Shimmura S., Munkhbat B., Hagihara M., Tsuji K., Tsubota K. Evidence of long-term survival of donor-derived cells after limbal allograft transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Jul;40(8):1664–1668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Swift G. J., Aggarwal R. K., Davis G. J., Coster D. J., Williams K. A. Survival of rabbit limbal stem cell allografts. Transplantation. 1996 Sep 15;62(5):568–574. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199609150-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tan D. T., Ficker L. A., Buckley R. J. Limbal transplantation. Ophthalmology. 1996 Jan;103(1):29–36. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30737-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thoft R. A., Wiley L. A., Sundarraj N. The multipotential cells of the limbus. Eye (Lond) 1989;3(Pt 2):109–113. doi: 10.1038/eye.1989.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tsai R. J., Sun T. T., Tseng S. C. Comparison of limbal and conjunctival autograft transplantation in corneal surface reconstruction in rabbits. Ophthalmology. 1990 Apr;97(4):446–455. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32575-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tsai R. J., Tseng S. C. Human allograft limbal transplantation for corneal surface reconstruction. Cornea. 1994 Sep;13(5):389–400. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199409000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tseng S. C., Prabhasawat P., Barton K., Gray T., Meller D. Amniotic membrane transplantation with or without limbal allografts for corneal surface reconstruction in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;116(4):431–441. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.4.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsubota K., Toda I., Saito H., Shinozaki N., Shimazaki J. Reconstruction of the corneal epithelium by limbal allograft transplantation for severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1995 Oct;102(10):1486–1496. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30841-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Turgeon P. W., Nauheim R. C., Roat M. I., Stopak S. S., Thoft R. A. Indications for keratoepithelioplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Feb;108(2):233–236. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070040085036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams K. A., Brereton H. M., Aggarwal R., Sykes P. J., Turner D. R., Russ G. R., Coster D. J. Use of DNA polymorphisms and the polymerase chain reaction to examine the survival of a human limbal stem cell allograft. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Sep;120(3):342–350. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72164-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu K. P., Wu Y., Zhou J., Zhang X. Survival of rabbit limbal stem cell allografts after administration of cyclosporin A. Cornea. 1999 Jul;18(4):459–465. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199907000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES