Abstract
Background: The sit and reach test is the most common flexibility test used in health related fitness test batteries.
Objective: To examine and compare three different sit and reach tests as a measure of hamstring flexibility in 102 female students.
Method: The traditional sit and reach test, the chair sit and reach test, the back saver sit and reach test, and passive straight leg raise were administered in three trials to all 102 students (mean (SD) age 22 (1) years) on the same day.
Results: A Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was significant (p<0.01) for the traditional sit and reach test with back saver sit and reach test and flexibility of hamstrings (r = 0.45 and 0.65 for left and right legs, and 0.63 and 0.53 for left and right legs respectively). Also, the back saver sit and reach test for the left (p<0.01) and right (p<0.05) leg was significantly associated with hamstring flexibility (r = 0.37 and 0.25 for the left leg and 0.50 and 0.44 for the right leg respectively).
Conclusion: The results indicate that the back saver sit and reach test produces reasonably accurate and stable measures of hamstring flexibility. Moreover, it appears that this test is a safe and acceptable alternative to the traditional and chair sit and reach tests as a measure of hamstring flexibility in young women.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bandy W. D., Irion J. M., Briggler M. The effect of static stretch and dynamic range of motion training on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Apr;27(4):295–300. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.4.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chung P. K., Yuen C. K. Criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach tests in university men in Hong Kong. Percept Mot Skills. 1999 Feb;88(1):304–316. doi: 10.2466/pms.1999.88.1.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoeger W. W., Hopkins D. R. A comparison of the sit and reach and the modified sit and reach in the measurement of flexibility in women. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992 Jun;63(2):191–195. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1992.10607580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hui S. C., Yuen P. Y., Morrow J. R., Jr, Jackson A. W. Comparison of the criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach tests with and without limb length adjustment in Asian adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999 Dec;70(4):401–406. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson A. W., Morrow J. R., Jr, Brill P. A., Kohl H. W., 3rd, Gordon N. F., Blair S. N. Relations of sit-up and sit-and-reach tests to low back pain in adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Jan;27(1):22–26. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.1.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson A., Langford N. J. The criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test: replication and extension of previous findings. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989 Dec;60(4):384–387. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones C. J., Rikli R. E., Max J., Noffal G. The reliability and validity of a chair sit-and-reach test as a measure of hamstring flexibility in older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998 Dec;69(4):338–343. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minkler S., Patterson P. The validity of the modified sit-and-reach test in college-age students. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994 Jun;65(2):189–192. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1994.10607614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mosher R. E., Carre F. A., Schutz R. W. Physical fitness of students in British Columbia: a criterion-referenced evaluation. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1982 Dec;7(4):249–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patterson P., Wiksten D. L., Ray L., Flanders C., Sanphy D. The validity and reliability of the back saver sit-and-reach test in middle school girls and boys. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996 Dec;67(4):448–451. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1996.10607976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]