Skip to main content
British Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Sports Medicine
. 2003 Jun;37(3):239–244. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.37.3.239

A prospective study of running injuries: the Vancouver Sun Run "In Training" clinics

J Taunton 1, M Ryan 1, D Clement 1, D McKenzie 1, D Lloyd-Smith 1, B Zumbo 1
PMCID: PMC1724633  PMID: 12782549

Abstract

Objectives: Seventeen running training clinics were investigated to determine the number of injuries that occur in a running programme designed to minimise the injury rate for athletes training for a 10 km race. The relative contributions of factors associated with injury were also reported.

Methods: A total of 844 primarily recreational runners were surveyed in three trials on the 4th, 8th, and 12th week of the 13 week programme of the "In Training" running clinics. Participants were classified as injured if they experienced at least a grade 1 injury—that is, pain only after running. Logistic regression modelling and odds ratio calculation were performed for each sex using the following predictor variables: age, body mass index (BMI), previous aerobic activity, running frequency, predominant running surface, arch height, running shoe age, and concurrent cross training.

Results: Age played an important part in injury in women: being over 50 years old was a risk factor for overall injury, and being less than 31 years was protective against new injury. Running only one day a week showed a non-significant trend for injury risk in men and was a significant risk factor in women and overall injury. A BMI of > 26 kg/m2 was reported as protective for men. Running shoe age also significantly contributed to the injury model. Half of the participants who reported an injury had had a previous injury; 42% of these reported that they were not completely rehabilitated on starting the 13 week training programme. An injury rate of 29.5% was recorded across all training clinics surveyed. The knee was the most commonly injured site.

Conclusions: Although age, BMI, running frequency (days a week), and running shoe age were associated with injury, these results do not take into account an adequate measure of exposure time to injury, running experience, or previous injury and should thus be viewed accordingly. In addition, the reason for the discrepancy in injury rate between these 17 clinics requires further study.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (136.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brill P. A., Macera C. A. The influence of running patterns on running injuries. Sports Med. 1995 Dec;20(6):365–368. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199520060-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jacobs S. J., Berson B. L. Injuries to runners: a study of entrants to a 10,000 meter race. Am J Sports Med. 1986 Mar-Apr;14(2):151–155. doi: 10.1177/036354658601400211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. James S. L., Bates B. T., Osternig L. R. Injuries to runners. Am J Sports Med. 1978 Mar-Apr;6(2):40–50. doi: 10.1177/036354657800600202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones B. H., Knapik J. J. Physical training and exercise-related injuries. Surveillance, research and injury prevention in military populations. Sports Med. 1999 Feb;27(2):111–125. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199927020-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Krivickas L. S. Anatomical factors associated with overuse sports injuries. Sports Med. 1997 Aug;24(2):132–146. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199724020-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kvist M. Achilles tendon injuries in athletes. Sports Med. 1994 Sep;18(3):173–201. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199418030-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Macera C. A. Lower extremity injuries in runners. Advances in prediction. Sports Med. 1992 Jan;13(1):50–57. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199213010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Macera C. A., Pate R. R., Powell K. E., Jackson K. L., Kendrick J. S., Craven T. E. Predicting lower-extremity injuries among habitual runners. Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2565–2568. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marti B., Vader J. P., Minder C. E., Abelin T. On the epidemiology of running injuries. The 1984 Bern Grand-Prix study. Am J Sports Med. 1988 May-Jun;16(3):285–294. doi: 10.1177/036354658801600316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Neely F. G. Intrinsic risk factors for exercise-related lower limb injuries. Sports Med. 1998 Oct;26(4):253–263. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ogon M., Aleksiev A. R., Pope M. H., Wimmer C., Saltzman C. L. Does arch height affect impact loading at the lower back level in running? Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Apr;20(4):263–266. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Walter S. D., Hart L. E., McIntosh J. M., Sutton J. R. The Ontario cohort study of running-related injuries. Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2561–2564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wen D. Y., Puffer J. C., Schmalzried T. P. Lower extremity alignment and risk of overuse injuries in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Oct;29(10):1291–1298. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199710000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. van Mechelen W. Can running injuries be effectively prevented? Sports Med. 1995 Mar;19(3):161–165. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199519030-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van Mechelen W. Running injuries. A review of the epidemiological literature. Sports Med. 1992 Nov;14(5):320–335. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199214050-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES