Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Sports Medicine
. 2004 Apr;38(2):197–205. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.005389

Reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test to predict aerobic power and to prescribe aerobic exercise

J Buckley 1, J Sim 1, R Eston 1, R Hession 1, R Fox 1
PMCID: PMC1724781  PMID: 15039259

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test (CST) used to predict VO2max and prescribe subsequent exercise.

Methods: The CST was performed twice on separate days by 7 males and 6 females aged 22.4 (SD 4.6) years. Heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and oxygen uptake (VO2) were measured at each stage of the CST.

Results: RPE, HR, and actual VO2 were the same at each stage for both trials but each of these measures was significantly different between CST stages (p<0.0005). Intertrial bias ±95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) of HR reached acceptable limits at CST stage IV (-2±10 beats/min) and for RPE at stages III (0.2±1.4) and IV (0.5±1.9). Age estimated HRmax significantly overestimated actual HRmax of 5 beats/min (p = 0.016) and the 95% LoA showed that this error could range from an underestimation of 17 beats/min to an overestimation of 7 beats/min. Estimated versus actual VO2 at each CST stage during both trials showed errors ranging between 11% and 19%. Trial 1 underestimated actual VO2max by 2.8 ml/kg/min (p = 0.006) and trial 2 by 1.6 ml/kg/min (not significant). The intertrial agreement in predicted VO2max was relatively narrow with a bias ±95% LoA of -0.8±3.7 ml/kg/min. The RPE and %HRmax (actual) correlation improved with a second trial. At all CST stages in trial 2 RPE:%HRmax coefficients were significant with the highest correlations at CST stages III (r = 0.78) and IV (r = 0.84).

Conclusion: CST VO2max prediction validity is questioned but the CST is reliable on a test-retest basis. VO2max prediction error is due more to VO2 estimation error at each CST stage compared with error in age estimated HRmax. The HR/RPE relation at >50% VO2max reliably represents the recommended intensity for developing cardiorespiratory fitness, but only when a practice trial of the CST is first performed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (287.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ainsworth B. E., Haskell W. L., Leon A. S., Jacobs D. R., Jr, Montoye H. J., Sallis J. F., Paffenbarger R. S., Jr Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):71–80. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson G., Nevill A. M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998 Oct;26(4):217–238. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berry M. J., Weyrich A. S., Robergs R. A., Krause K. M., Ingalls C. P. Ratings of perceived exertion in individuals with varying fitness levels during walking and running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;58(5):494–499. doi: 10.1007/BF02330703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boutcher S. H., Seip R. L., Hetzler R. K., Pierce E. F., Snead D., Weltman A. The effects of specificity of training on rating of perceived exertion at the lactate threshold. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;59(5):365–369. doi: 10.1007/BF02389812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buckley J. P., Eston R. G., Sim J. Ratings of perceived exertion in braille: validity and reliability in production mode. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Aug;34(4):297–302. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies C. T., Sargeant A. J. The effects of atropine and practolol on the perception of exertion during treadmill exercise. Ergonomics. 1979 Oct;22(10):1141–1146. doi: 10.1080/00140137908924688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ekblom B., Goldbarg A. N. The influence of physical training and other factors on the subjective rating of perceived exertion. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Nov;83(3):399–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb05093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eston R. G., Williams J. G. Reliability of ratings of perceived effort regulation of exercise intensity. Br J Sports Med. 1988 Dec;22(4):153–155. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.22.4.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Green J. M., Michael T., Solomon A. H. The validity of ratings of perceived exertion for cross-modal regulation of swimming intensity. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999 Sep;39(3):207–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Head A., Maxwell S., Kendall M. J. Exercise metabolism in healthy volunteers taking celiprolol, atenolol, and placebo. Br J Sports Med. 1997 Jun;31(2):120–125. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.2.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Held T., Marti B. Substantial influence of level of endurance capacity on the association of perceived exertion with blood lactate accumulation. Int J Sports Med. 1999 Jan;20(1):34–39. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hetzler R. K., Seip R. L., Boutcher S. H., Pierce E., Snead D., Weltman A. Effect of exercise modality on ratings of perceived exertion at various lactate concentrations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Jan;23(1):88–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jetté M., Campbell J., Mongeon J., Routhier R. The Canadian Home Fitness Test as a predictor for aerobic capacity. Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Apr 17;114(8):680–682. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moyna N. M., Robertson R. J., Meckes C. L., Peoples J. A., Millich N. B., Thompson P. D. Intermodal comparison of energy expenditure at exercise intensities corresponding to the perceptual preference range. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Aug;33(8):1404–1410. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Myers J., Atwood J. E., Sullivan M., Forbes S., Friis R., Pewen W., Froelicher V. Perceived exertion and gas exchange after calcium and beta-blockade in atrial fibrillation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1987 Jul;63(1):97–104. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nevill A. M., Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med. 1997 Dec;31(4):314–318. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.4.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Seip R. L., Snead D., Pierce E. F., Stein P., Weltman A. Perceptual responses and blood lactate concentration: effect of training state. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Jan;23(1):80–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sjöberg H., Frankenhaeuser M., Bjurstedt H. Interactions between heart rate, psychomotor performance and perceived effort during physical work as influenced by beta-adrenergic blockade. Biol Psychol. 1979 Feb;8(1):31–43. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(79)90003-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stevens N., Sykes K. Aerobic fitness testing: an update. Occup Health (Lond) 1996 Dec;48(12):436–438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thomas T. R., Ziogas G., Smith T., Zhang Q., Londeree B. R. Physiological and perceived exertion responses to six modes of submaximal exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1995 Sep;66(3):239–246. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1995.10608838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zeni A. I., Hoffman M. D., Clifford P. S. Energy expenditure with indoor exercise machines. JAMA. 1996 May 8;275(18):1424–1427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van Herwaarden C. L., Binkhorst R. A., Fennis J. F., van't Laar A. Effects of propranolol and metoprolol on haemodynamic and respiratory indices and on perceived exertion during exercise in hypertensive patients. Br Heart J. 1979 Jan;41(1):99–105. doi: 10.1136/hrt.41.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES