Skip to main content
British Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Sports Medicine
. 2004 Jun;38(3):289–291. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2002.002212

Validity of Queen's College step test for use with young Indian men

S Chatterjee 1, P Chatterjee 1, P Mukherjee 1, A Bandyopadhyay 1
PMCID: PMC1724834  PMID: 15155428

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the suitability of the Queen's College step test (QCT) to predict maximum oxygen uptake in Indian men.

Methods: Thirty sedentary male university students from West Bengal, India, with the same socioeconomic background and mean (SD) age, height, and weight of 22.6 (0.2) years, 166.4 (0.5) cm, and 53.8 (0.2) kg, respectively, were randomly sampled from University of Calcutta. VO2max of each participant was determined by direct procedure involving incremental bicycle exercise and also by applying indirect QCT method with a gap of 4 days between the tests.

Results: The difference between the mean (SD) VO2max values directly measured (VO2max = 39.8 (1.03) ml/min/kg body mass) and indirectly predicted (PVO2max = 39.3 (1.07) ml/min/kg body mass) was statistically insignificant (p>0.10). PVO2max and VO2max values expressed as ml/min/kg body mass corroborated with previous studies in the same laboratory involving the same population, and also exhibited significant statistical correlation (r = 0.95, p<0.001) between them.

Conclusion: The results suggest that QCT can be applied in the studied population to produce a good estimation of maximum oxygen uptake, especially in the field where large numbers of participants are to be evaluated without a well equipped laboratory.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASTRAND P. O., RYHMING I. A nomogram for calculation of aerobic capacity (physical fitness) from pulse rate during sub-maximal work. J Appl Physiol. 1954 Sep;7(2):218–221. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1954.7.2.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chatterjee S., Chakravarti B. Comparative study of maximum aerobic capacity by three ergometries in untrained college women. Jpn J Physiol. 1986;36(1):151–162. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.36.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper K. H. A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake. Correlation between field and treadmill testing. JAMA. 1968 Jan 15;203(3):201–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fox E. L. A simple, accurate technique for predicting maximal aerobic power. J Appl Physiol. 1973 Dec;35(6):914–916. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.6.914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kline G. M., Porcari J. P., Hintermeister R., Freedson P. S., Ward A., McCarron R. F., Ross J., Rippe J. M. Estimation of VO2max from a one-mile track walk, gender, age, and body weight. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987 Jun;19(3):253–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Margaria R., Aghemo P., Rovelli E. Indirect determination of maximal O2 consumption in man. J Appl Physiol. 1965 Sep;20(5):1070–1073. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1965.20.5.1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McArdle W. D., Katch F. I., Pechar G. S., Jacobson L., Ruck S. Reliability and interrelationships between maximal oxygen intake, physical work capacity and step-test scores in college women. Med Sci Sports. 1972 Winter;4(4):182–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Siconolfi S. F., Cullinane E. M., Carleton R. A., Thompson P. D. Assessing VO2max in epidemiologic studies: modification of the Astrand-Rhyming test. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):335–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES