Skip to main content
British Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Sports Medicine
. 2005 Mar;39(3):e13. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.011627

Relation between foot arch index and ankle strength in elite gymnasts: a preliminary study

S Aydog, L Ozcakar, O Tetik, H Demirel, Z Hascelik, M Doral
PMCID: PMC1725158  PMID: 15728681

Abstract

Background: Gymnasts usually start intensive training from early childhood. The impact of such strenuous training on the musculoskeletal system is not clear.

Objectives: To evaluate the relation between muscle strength of the ankle joint and foot structure in gymnasts.

Methods: The study population comprised 20 high level male gymnasts and 17 non-athletic healthy male controls. Arch indices were measured using a podoscope. Ankle plantar/dorsiflexion and eversion/inversion strengths were measured using a Biodex 3 dynamometer within the protocol of concentric/concentric five repetitions at 30°/s velocity.

Results: The mean arch index of the right and left foot of the gymnasts and the controls were respectively: 31.4 (29.1), 34.01 (34.65); 60.01 (30.3), 63.75 (32.27). Both the arch indices and the ankle dorsiflexion strengths were lower in the gymnasts. Although no correlation was found between strength and arch index in the control group, a significant correlation was observed between eversion strengths and arch indices of the gymnasts (r = 0.41, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Whether or not the findings indicate sport specific adaptation or less training of the ankle dorsiflexors, prospective data are required to elucidate the tendency for pes cavus in gymnasts, for whom stabilisation of the foot is a priority.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (52.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Feltner M. E., MacRae H. S., MacRae P. G., Turner N. S., Hartman C. A., Summers M. L., Welch M. D. Strength training effects on rearfoot motion in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Aug;26(8):1021–1027. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Forriol F., Pascual J. Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle. 1990 Oct;11(2):101–104. doi: 10.1177/107110079001100208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Klingele J., Hoppeler H., Biedert R. Statische Abweichungen beim Spitzensportler. Schweiz Z Sportmed. 1993 Jun;41(2):55–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. So C. H., Siu T. O., Chan K. M., Chin M. K., Li C. T. Isokinetic profile of dorsiflexors and plantar flexors of the ankle--a comparative study of élite versus untrained subjects. Br J Sports Med. 1994 Mar;28(1):25–30. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.28.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Staheli L. T., Chew D. E., Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Mar;69(3):426–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Volkov B. M. Vliianie znachitel'nykh sportivnykh nagruzok na sostoianie stopy iunykh sportsmenov shkoly-internate sportivnogo profilia. Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol. 1977 Jun;72(6):32–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES