Skip to main content
British Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Sports Medicine
. 2005 May;39(5):294–297. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013771

Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment for use by family doctors

A Marshall 1, B Smith 1, A Bauman 1, S Kaur 1, F Bull 1
PMCID: PMC1725203  PMID: 15849294

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment tool suitable for doctors to use to identify inactive patients in the primary care setting.

Methods: Volunteer family doctors (n = 8) screened consenting patients (n = 75) for physical activity participation using a brief physical activity assessment tool. Inter-rater reliability was assessed within one week (n = 71). Validity was assessed against an objective physical activity monitor (computer science and applications accelerometer; n = 42).

Results: The brief physical activity assessment tool produced repeatable estimates of "sufficient total physical activity", correctly classifying over 76% of cases (κ 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.72). The validity coefficient was reasonable (κ 0.40, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.69), with good percentage agreement (71%).

Conclusions: The brief physical activity assessment tool is a reliable instrument, with validity similar to that of more detailed self report measures of physical activity. It is a tool that can be used efficiently in routine primary healthcare services to identify insufficiently active patients who may need physical activity advice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Booth M. L., Bauman A., Owen N., Gore C. J. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):131–137. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.9982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bull F. C., Schipper E. C., Jamrozik K., Blanksby B. A. Beliefs and behaviour of general practitioners regarding promotion of physical activity. Aust J Public Health. 1995 Jun;19(3):300–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Craig Cora L., Marshall Alison L., Sjöström Michael, Bauman Adrian E., Booth Michael L., Ainsworth Barbara E., Pratt Michael, Ekelund Ulf, Yngve Agneta, Sallis James F. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381–1395. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eakin E. G., Glasgow R. E., Riley K. M. Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research. J Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;49(2):158–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sallis J. F., Saelens B. E. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71(2 Suppl):S1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith B. J., Bauman A. E., Bull F. C., Booth M. L., Harris M. F. Promoting physical activity in general practice: a controlled trial of written advice and information materials. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Aug;34(4):262–267. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES