Skip to main content
British Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Sports Medicine
. 2005 Sep;39(9):675–680. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.018275

A comparison of physiological and anthropometric characteristics among playing positions in junior rugby league players

T Gabbett 1
PMCID: PMC1725326  PMID: 16118309

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the physiological and anthropometric characteristics of specific playing positions and positional playing groups in junior rugby league players.

Methods: Two hundred and forty junior rugby league players underwent measurements of standard anthropometry (body mass, height, sum of four skinfolds), muscular power (vertical jump), speed (10, 20, and 40 m sprint), agility (L run), and estimated maximal aerobic power (multi-stage fitness test) during the competitive phase of the season, after players had obtained a degree of match fitness.

Results: Props were significantly (p<0.05) taller, heavier, and had greater skinfold thickness than all other positions. The halfback and centre positions were faster than props over 40 m. Halfbacks had significantly (p<0.05) greater estimated maximal aerobic power than props. When data were analysed according to positional similarities, it was found that the props positional group had lower 20 and 40 m speed, agility, and estimated maximal aerobic power than the hookers and halves and outside backs positional groups. Differences in the physiological and anthropometric characteristics of other individual playing positions and positional playing groups were uncommon.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that few physiological and anthropometric differences exist among individual playing positions in junior rugby league players, although props are taller, heavier, have greater skinfold thickness, lower 20 and 40 m speed, agility, and estimated maximal aerobic power than other positional playing groups. These findings provide normative data and realistic performance standards for junior rugby league players competing in specific individual positions and positional playing groups.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (78.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker D. Comparison of upper-body strength and power between professional and college-aged rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Feb;15(1):30–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker Daniel. Differences in strength and power among junior-high, senior-high, college-aged, and elite professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Nov;16(4):581–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Estell J., Shenstone B., Barnsley L. Frequency of injuries in different age-groups in an elite rugby league club. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1995 Dec;27(4):95–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gabbett T. J. Incidence, site, and nature of injuries in amateur rugby league over three consecutive seasons. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Apr;34(2):98–103. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.2.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gabbett T. J. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of amateur rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Aug;34(4):303–307. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gabbett T. J. Physiological characteristics of junior and senior rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2002 Oct;36(5):334–339. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.5.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gabbett Tim J. Changes in physiological and anthropometric characteristics of rugby league players during a competitive season. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 May;19(2):400–408. doi: 10.1519/14884.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gabbett Tim J., Domrow Nathan. Risk factors for injury in subelite rugby league players. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Mar;33(3):428–434. doi: 10.1177/0363546504268407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gabbett Tim J. Influence of physiological characteristics on selection in a semi-professional first grade rugby league team: a case study. J Sports Sci. 2002 May;20(5):399–405. doi: 10.1080/026404102317366654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gabbett Tim J. Influence of training and match intensity on injuries in rugby league. J Sports Sci. 2004 May;22(5):409–417. doi: 10.1080/02640410310001641638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meir R., Newton R., Curtis E., Fardell M., Butler B. Physical fitness qualities of professional rugby league football players: determination of positional differences. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Nov;15(4):450–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramsbottom R., Brewer J., Williams C. A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med. 1988 Dec;22(4):141–144. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.22.4.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Young W. B., James R., Montgomery I. Is muscle power related to running speed with changes of direction? J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002 Sep;42(3):282–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES