Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2001 Jan;18(1):39–45. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.1.39

Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation

J Acworth 1, D Purdie 1, R Clark 1
PMCID: PMC1725505  PMID: 11310461

Abstract

Objectives—This study compared intranasal midazolam (INM) with a combination of intravenous ketamine and intravenous midazolam (IVKM) for sedation of children requiring minor procedures in the emergency department.

Method—A single blinded randomised clinical trial was conducted in the emergency department of a major urban paediatric hospital. Subjects requiring sedation for minor procedures were randomised to receive either INM (0.4 mg/kg) or intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg) plus intravenous midazolam (0.1 mg/kg). Physiological variables and two independent measures of sedation (Sedation Score and Visual Analogue Sedation Scale) were recorded before sedation and at regular intervals during the procedure and recovery period. Times to adequate level of sedation and to discharge were compared.

Results—Fifty three patients were enrolled over a 10 month period. Sedation was sufficient to complete the procedures in all children receiving IVKM and in 24 of the 26 receiving INM. Onset of sedation was an average of 5.3 minutes quicker with IVKM than with INM (95%CI 3.2, 7.4 minutes, p<0.001). Children given INM were discharged an average of 19 minutes earlier than those given IVKM (95%CI 4, 33 minutes, p=0.02). Mean Sedation Scores and Visual Analogue Sedation Scale scores for the 30 minutes after drug administration were significantly better in children given IVKM compared with INM (2.4 and 1.8 versus 3.5 and 3.8, respectively). Both doctors and parents were more satisfied with sedation by intravenous ketamine and midazolam.

Conclusions—Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam used in an appropriate setting by experienced personnel provides an excellent means of achieving sedation suitable for most non-painful minor procedures for children in the emergency department. This combination is superior to INM in terms of speed of onset and consistency of effect. INM delivered via aerosol spray has a more variable effect but may still be adequate for the completion of many of these procedures.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (146.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews J. S. Conscious sedation in the pediatric emergency department. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1995 Jun;7(3):309–313. doi: 10.1097/00008480-199506000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Connors K., Terndrup T. E. Nasal versus oral midazolam for sedation of anxious children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Dec;24(6):1074–1079. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70236-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coté C. J. Sedation for the pediatric patient. A review. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1994 Feb;41(1):31–58. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38690-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dachs R. J., Innes G. M. Intravenous ketamine sedation of pediatric patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Jan;29(1):146–150. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70321-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis P. J., Tome J. A., McGowan F. X., Jr, Cohen I. T., Latta K., Felder H. Preanesthetic medication with intranasal midazolam for brief pediatric surgical procedures. Effect on recovery and hospital discharge times. Anesthesiology. 1995 Jan;82(1):2–5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fishbein M., Lugo R. A., Woodland J., Lininger B., Linscheid T. Evaluation of intranasal midazolam in children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997 Sep;25(3):261–266. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199709000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Green S. M., Johnson N. E. Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: Part 2, Review and implications. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Sep;19(9):1033–1046. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82569-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Green S. M., Nakamura R., Johnson N. E. Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: Part 1, A prospective series. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Sep;19(9):1024–1032. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82568-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Green S. M., Rothrock S. G., Lynch E. L., Ho M., Harris T., Hestdalen R., Hopkins G. A., Garrett W., Westcott K. Intramuscular ketamine for pediatric sedation in the emergency department: safety profile in 1,022 cases. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Jun;31(6):688–697. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70226-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karl H. W., Rosenberger J. L., Larach M. G., Ruffle J. M. Transmucosal administration of midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients. Comparison of the nasal and sublingual routes. Anesthesiology. 1993 May;78(5):885–891. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199305000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McGlone R. G., Ranasinghe S., Durham S. An alternative to "brutacaine": a comparison of low dose intramuscular ketamine with intranasal midazolam in children before suturing. J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;15(4):231–236. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.4.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Neil G., Paech M., Wood F. Preliminary clinical use of a patient-controlled intranasal analgesia (PCINA) device. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1997 Aug;25(4):408–412. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9702500414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parker R. I., Mahan R. A., Giugliano D., Parker M. M. Efficacy and safety of intravenous midazolam and ketamine as sedation for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in children. Pediatrics. 1997 Mar;99(3):427–431. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.3.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Petrack E. M., Marx C. M., Wright M. S. Intramuscular ketamine is superior to meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric emergency department sedation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Jul;150(7):676–681. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170320022003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Proudfoot J. Analgesia, anesthesia, and conscious sedation. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1995 May;13(2):357–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Reich D. L., Silvay G. Ketamine: an update on the first twenty-five years of clinical experience. Can J Anaesth. 1989 Mar;36(2):186–197. doi: 10.1007/BF03011442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sacchetti A., Schafermeyer R., Geradi M., Graneto J., Fuerst R. S., Cantor R., Santamaria J., Tsai A. K., Dieckmann R. A., Barkin R. Pediatric analgesia and sedation. Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Feb;23(2):237–250. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Theroux M. C., West D. W., Corddry D. H., Hyde P. M., Bachrach S. J., Cronan K. M., Kettrick R. G. Efficacy of intranasal midazolam in facilitating suturing of lacerations in preschool children in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 1993 Mar;91(3):624–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilton N. C., Leigh J., Rosen D. R., Pandit U. A. Preanesthetic sedation of preschool children using intranasal midazolam. Anesthesiology. 1988 Dec;69(6):972–975. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198812000-00032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yealy D. M., Ellis J. H., Hobbs G. D., Moscati R. M. Intranasal midazolam as a sedative for children during laceration repair. Am J Emerg Med. 1992 Nov;10(6):584–587. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(92)90190-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zedie N., Amory D. W., Wagner B. K., O'Hara D. A. Comparison of intranasal midazolam and sufentanil premedication in pediatric outpatients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Mar;59(3):341–348. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(96)80012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES